Fabian Kalleitner

Fabian Kalleitner

@kalf.bsky.social

Sociologist working @LMU Munich. Former FU Berlin & University of Vienna. I'm interested in social and economic inequality working on topics like taxation, (un)employment, and redistribution https://fabiankal.github.io/

1.1K followers594 following82 posts

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

View full thread

But support for specific policies barely moves. Even recognizing gender pay gaps as unfair does not, by itself, turn into support for the policies designed to address them.

View full thread

🧪 We use preregistered survey experiments in the U.S. and Germany, varying → the size of the gap (high vs. low) → its source (overall gap vs. gap between women and men in the same jobs and firms)

📊 Larger and within-job gaps both raise the perceived size and unfairness of the pay gap. Within-job information also reduces attributions to women's own choices and modestly increases support for government action. Some of the largest shifts: U.S. conservatives and German men.

🔍 Most people agree that women and men should be paid equally for equal work. Far fewer support pay transparency laws or gender quotas. Does information about the gender pay gap narrow this principle and policy gap? And do the magnitude and underlying sources of gender pay disparities matter?

New paper on why and how people's policy preferences are related to their perceiced sources of labor market risks (tech, offshoring, immigration). doi.org/10.1177/0958... Happy that it already attracted some attention on scilove.

doi.orgSage Journals: Discover world-class researchSubscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
SciLove@scilove.bsky.social

🔥 Trending on SciLove today 🔥 🔬 Technology, migrants or offshoring: How the perceived source of labour-market risks shapes policy demands 👤 Bobzien et al., 2026 📖 Journal of European Social Policy 🔗 https://www.scilove.app/article/10.1177/09589287261491123 #PoliSci #AcademicSky #AcademicChatter

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

Interesting new QJE paper shows inflation gets more attention when people are more exposed to it and when they have past inflation experiences. Those with inflation top of mind follow more inflation news, raise inflation expectations more; firms are more likely to raise prices.

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

This year's PISA results are really striking. If the decline in performance in reading and mathematics cannot be explained by measurement issues (as argued in the report), the decline is truly immense.

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

Big news! 🎉 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚜 1.0.0 for #Rstats is out. It’s a big number and it feels like a big step. I wrote a blog on the challenges of interpreting statistical models, SPEED, cool new features, the future, and a 5 year package development and writing odyssey. arelbundock.com/posts/margin...

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER) and LIS Data Center are hiring a 3-year postdoc for work on public policy, welfare and socio-economic inequality. Open to economics, sociology, pol sci and related disciplines. Apply by Sep 15th: jobs.liser.lu/job/Esch-sur...

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

What a workshop! 🎉 The 2nd International Workshop on Life Course Analysis has wrapped up — three days at Hertie School in Berlin with outstanding presentations across education, health, family, ageing & more. Huge thanks to all presenters and participants for the engaged discussions 🙏

The Austrian socio economic panel takes shape! now with two waves available as easy to access scientific use files.

Matthias Reiter-Pázmándy@reiterpazmandy.bsky.social

Daten, Daten, Daten: die zweite Welle von #ASEP, dem Austrian Socio-Economic Panel steht ab sofort als Scientific Use-File über @aussda.bsky.social zur Verfügung: data.aussda.at/dataverse/asep

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

In 2023, @nature.com published 'Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time', receiving world-wide media attention. Our Matters Arising, published after a 32 month delay (more on that soon), shows that the reported decline can largely be attributed to dataset artefacts. 🧵

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

This is a shame: COS phasing out OSF Projects. Responsibly, with plenty of notice and preservation of existing content, and continuation of other OSF services (including preprints!).

COS is announcing important changes to the Open Science Framework (OSF). OSF Projects—used for project collaboration, file mgmt, & storage—is being phased out as an active workspace over the next 6 months. This change does not affect persistence & accessibility of existing public projects. (🧵1/2)

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

I recommend for anybody who wants to see the results of ai garbage in science to just take a quick look at some of the recently published papers in this "journal".

DavidPBLRoss@davidpblross.bsky.social

A paper published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications had quickly become one of the most cited studies supporting the use of ChatGPT in education. It was retracted today via @nature www.nature.com/articles/s41... #edtech #GenAI #ailiteracy #aiready #aifluency #edpolicy #edresearch

View full thread

We note that this study provides an initial test of subjective inequity aversion in a largely cross-sectional setting. Our focus required abstracting from other parts of the inequality–happiness link (obj. and subj. inequality) that likely shape how inequality translates into perceived inequity.

View full thread

Our findings thus indicate that (1) besides material rewards, perceived income fairness is a key driver of subjective well-being However, individuals are (2) more sensitive to unfairness affecting themselves than others and (3) to unfairness at the top of the income distribution than at the bottom

Hence, while most respondents agree that low-income earners are paid "unfairly too little," only perceptions that the rich "earn too much" and "I earn too little" are consistently linked to lower well-being.

View full thread

We find: Subjective well-being decreases when people perceive their *own earnings* or *top incomes* as unfair. Results provide no consistent evidence for a relationship between the perceived unfairness of bottom incomes and subjective well-being.

Using additional data from the German SOEP, we further show that the relationship between perceived fairness of one's own income and life satisfaction also holds longitudinally, focusing on within-individual variation - although only for disadvantageous inequity.

View full thread

3) Disadvantageous unfair inequality (e.g., if the rich have unfairly too much) should hurt more than advantageous unfair inequality (e.g., if the poor have unfairly too little). This leads us to expect the following pattern of subjective inequity aversion:

We use data from the ESS, where respondents evaluated the fairness of their own earnings and the actual incomes of the rich and poor Because resp. were informed about these incomes, we can isolate the relationship btw perceived unfairness and happiness independent of differences in perc. inequality

Drawing on theories of inequity aversion, social justice, and social comparison, we argue: 1) It's not objective inequality but *perceived unfairness* that should hurt well-being.

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

“…4-year longitudinal assessment of all… French first & second graders (2,653,082 children). Boys & girls exhibited very similar maths scores upon school entry, but a gender gap in favour of boys became highly significant after 4 months of schooling” www.nature.com/articles/s41... Wow!

nature.comRapid emergence of a maths gender gap in first grade - NatureBoys and girls exhibit very similar maths scores upon school entry, but a gender gap in favour of boys becomes highly significant after 4 months of schooling, which increases with years of schooling,&...

Fabian Kalleitner reposted

1/ Can AI help researchers check whether published social science results actually reproduce? In our new PNAS paper, we tested this directly in the AI Replication Games: 288 researchers, 103 teams, and real replication packages from quantitative social science.