Sociologist working @LMU Munich. Former FU Berlin & University of Vienna. I'm interested in social and economic inequality working on topics like taxation, (un)employment, and redistribution
https://fabiankal.github.io/
New paper out NOW! 🎉
Do people care enough about unfair inequality for it to affect their subjective well-being?
And does it matter whose earnings they perceive as unfair (their own, the rich, or the poor)?
We find: not all perceived unfairness is equal.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Eine großartige AMDC-ASEP-Nutzer:innenkonferenz ging gestern an der @oeaw.bsky.social über die Bühne. Die Veranstaltung in Kooperation mit @statistik.at und #BMFWF zeigte die Möglichkeiten und Leistungen der beiden Forschungsinfrastrukturen für die österreichische Forschungscommunity.
Have we abandoned #TWFE too quickly?😮
New in #Sociological#Methodology w/ @aksoyundan.bsky.social
We compare TWFE event studies vs dynamic #DID estimators. Results suggest a more nuanced picture than "never use TWFE" and clarify when different estimators perform well 👇
🔗 doi.org/10.1177/0081...
Inheritance taxation is unpopular, even amongst people who are unlikely to ever have to pay it. Why?
In four different studies - experiment! panels! behaviour! - @cvalebeek.bsky.social and I show political trust is a strong predictor for support for the tax.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
📄 New working paper with an amazing group: Jule Adriaans, @brueggemann-o.bsky.social, @cmoya.bsky.social & Sandra Bohmann
We ask:
Can evidence of gender pay gaps (overall or within jobs) raise concerns about fairness and, in turn, shift policy preferences?
🧵
But support for specific policies barely moves.
Even recognizing gender pay gaps as unfair does not, by itself, turn into support for the policies designed to address them.
📄 New working paper with an amazing group: Jule Adriaans, @brueggemann-o.bsky.social, @cmoya.bsky.social & Sandra Bohmann
We ask:
Can evidence of gender pay gaps (overall or within jobs) raise concerns about fairness and, in turn, shift policy preferences?
🧵
🧪 We use preregistered survey experiments in the U.S. and Germany, varying
→ the size of the gap (high vs. low)
→ its source (overall gap vs. gap between women and men in the same jobs and firms)
📊 Larger and within-job gaps both raise the perceived size and unfairness of the pay gap.
Within-job information also reduces attributions to women's own choices and modestly increases support for government action. Some of the largest shifts: U.S. conservatives and German men.
📄 New working paper with an amazing group: Jule Adriaans, @brueggemann-o.bsky.social, @cmoya.bsky.social & Sandra Bohmann
We ask:
Can evidence of gender pay gaps (overall or within jobs) raise concerns about fairness and, in turn, shift policy preferences?
🧵
🔍 Most people agree that women and men should be paid equally for equal work. Far fewer support pay transparency laws or gender quotas.
Does information about the gender pay gap narrow this principle and policy gap? And do the magnitude and underlying sources of gender pay disparities matter?
New paper on why and how people's policy preferences are related to their perceiced sources of labor market risks (tech, offshoring, immigration).
doi.org/10.1177/0958...
Happy that it already attracted some attention on scilove.
🔥 Trending on SciLove today 🔥
🔬 Technology, migrants or offshoring: How the perceived source of labour-market risks shapes policy demands
👤 Bobzien et al., 2026
📖 Journal of European Social Policy
🔗 https://www.scilove.app/article/10.1177/09589287261491123
#PoliSci #AcademicSky #AcademicChatter
Timely new paper in @socioeconreview.bsky.social: Does rising wealth concentration undermine American democracy?
Using variation across the 50 U.S. states, results reveal a clear, negative effect of millionaire wealth concentration on democratic performance.
doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwag058
Interesting new QJE paper shows inflation gets more attention when people are more exposed to it and when they have past inflation experiences. Those with inflation top of mind follow more inflation news, raise inflation expectations more; firms are more likely to raise prices.
Important new paper on the dual VET system and wage inequality. Wage inequality, especially at the bottom of the distribution, is lower in societies with stronger dual VET systems. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
🚨 Call for Applications: Postdocs
We’re looking for postdoctoral researchers for the following research areas and topics:
- Political Economy
- Economic Sociology
- Technology and Statehood
- Wealth and Social Inequality
🗓️ Application deadline: Dec. 11
📢 Please share widely!
s.gwdg.de/UzLEpr
This year's PISA results are really striking. If the decline in performance in reading and mathematics cannot be explained by measurement issues (as argued in the report), the decline is truly immense.
Big news! 🎉
𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚜 1.0.0 for #Rstats is out. It’s a big number and it feels like a big step.
I wrote a blog on the challenges of interpreting statistical models, SPEED, cool new features, the future, and a 5 year package development and writing odyssey.
arelbundock.com/posts/margin...
Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER) and LIS Data Center are hiring a 3-year postdoc for work on public policy, welfare and socio-economic inequality.
Open to economics, sociology, pol sci and related disciplines.
Apply by Sep 15th: jobs.liser.lu/job/Esch-sur...
What a workshop! 🎉 The 2nd International Workshop on Life Course Analysis has wrapped up — three days at Hertie School in Berlin with outstanding presentations across education, health, family, ageing & more. Huge thanks to all presenters and participants for the engaged discussions 🙏
Daten, Daten, Daten:
die zweite Welle von #ASEP, dem Austrian Socio-Economic Panel steht ab sofort als Scientific Use-File über @aussda.bsky.social zur Verfügung:
data.aussda.at/dataverse/asep
In 2023, @nature.com published 'Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time', receiving world-wide media attention. Our Matters Arising, published after a 32 month delay (more on that soon), shows that the reported decline can largely be attributed to dataset artefacts. 🧵
This is a shame: COS phasing out OSF Projects. Responsibly, with plenty of notice and preservation of existing content, and continuation of other OSF services (including preprints!).
COS is announcing important changes to the Open Science Framework (OSF).
OSF Projects—used for project collaboration, file mgmt, & storage—is being phased out as an active workspace over the next 6 months. This change does not affect persistence & accessibility of existing public projects. (🧵1/2)
Analysis of our #data was conducted for research on #inequality and wellbeing published by the Journal of Happiness Studies (@springernature.com).
Sandra Bohmann and Fabian Kalleitner (@lmu.de 🇩🇪 ) investigated whether perceived unfair inequality has a negative effect on #wellbeing.
1/6 What happens when you tell an AI browser: “Fill out this survey”?
It fills out the survey.
In our new study, led by @rtopinkova.bsky.social, we tested three consumer-facing agentic browsers without lengthy prompts, custom code, or technical fine-tuning.
📢 Call for Papers! We are partnering with the Journal of Economic Surveys on a special issue: Reproducibility and Meta-Science in Economics.
Submission deadline: 1 March 2027. Details in thread 🧵
🚨We are hiring a two-year postdoctoral researcher (80%) at the University of Zurich within the new Horizon Europe project WELFAIR on the political implications of technological change, demographic ageing and rising inequality.
The full job ad is here: tinyurl.com/3b6ddm25
Apply by August 9, 2026.
I recommend for anybody who wants to see the results of ai garbage in science to just take a quick look at some of the recently published papers in this "journal".
A paper published in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications had quickly become one of the most cited studies supporting the use of ChatGPT in education. It was retracted today via @nature www.nature.com/articles/s41...#edtech#GenAI#ailiteracy#aiready#aifluency#edpolicy#edresearch
New paper out NOW! 🎉
Do people care enough about unfair inequality for it to affect their subjective well-being?
And does it matter whose earnings they perceive as unfair (their own, the rich, or the poor)?
We find: not all perceived unfairness is equal.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
We note that this study provides an initial test of subjective inequity aversion in a largely cross-sectional setting.
Our focus required abstracting from other parts of the inequality–happiness link (obj. and subj. inequality) that likely shape how inequality translates into perceived inequity.
New paper out NOW! 🎉
Do people care enough about unfair inequality for it to affect their subjective well-being?
And does it matter whose earnings they perceive as unfair (their own, the rich, or the poor)?
We find: not all perceived unfairness is equal.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Our findings thus indicate that (1) besides material rewards, perceived income fairness is a key driver of subjective well-being
However, individuals are (2) more sensitive to unfairness affecting themselves than others and (3) to unfairness at the top of the income distribution than at the bottom
Hence, while most respondents agree that low-income earners are paid "unfairly too little," only perceptions that the rich "earn too much" and "I earn too little" are consistently linked to lower well-being.
New paper out NOW! 🎉
Do people care enough about unfair inequality for it to affect their subjective well-being?
And does it matter whose earnings they perceive as unfair (their own, the rich, or the poor)?
We find: not all perceived unfairness is equal.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
We find:
Subjective well-being decreases when people perceive their *own earnings* or *top incomes* as unfair.
Results provide no consistent evidence for a relationship between the perceived unfairness of bottom incomes and subjective well-being.
Using additional data from the German SOEP, we further show that the relationship between perceived fairness of one's own income and life satisfaction also holds longitudinally, focusing on within-individual variation - although only for disadvantageous inequity.
New paper out NOW! 🎉
Do people care enough about unfair inequality for it to affect their subjective well-being?
And does it matter whose earnings they perceive as unfair (their own, the rich, or the poor)?
We find: not all perceived unfairness is equal.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
3) Disadvantageous unfair inequality (e.g., if the rich have unfairly too much) should hurt more than advantageous unfair inequality (e.g., if the poor have unfairly too little).
This leads us to expect the following pattern of subjective inequity aversion:
We use data from the ESS, where respondents evaluated the fairness of their own earnings and the actual incomes of the rich and poor
Because resp. were informed about these incomes, we can isolate the relationship btw perceived unfairness and happiness independent of differences in perc. inequality
New paper out NOW! 🎉
Do people care enough about unfair inequality for it to affect their subjective well-being?
And does it matter whose earnings they perceive as unfair (their own, the rich, or the poor)?
We find: not all perceived unfairness is equal.
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Drawing on theories of inequity aversion, social justice, and social comparison, we argue:
1) It's not objective inequality but *perceived unfairness* that should hurt well-being.
2) Individuals evaluate the fairness of the distribution of outcomes using three anchor points: themselves, those who have more, and those who have less.
There’s been a lot of buzz around the Borjas/Breznau (2026) paper (www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...) and potential ideological bias in research.
We took a closer look at the data. Could there be a "bias in bias research"?
Here is what we found: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10...
“…4-year longitudinal assessment of all… French first & second graders (2,653,082 children). Boys & girls exhibited very similar maths scores upon school entry, but a gender gap in favour of boys became highly significant after 4 months of schooling”
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Wow!
1/ Can AI help researchers check whether published social science results actually reproduce? In our new PNAS paper, we tested this directly in the AI Replication Games: 288 researchers, 103 teams, and real replication packages from quantitative social science.