Post

definitely no

In other words no they’re still taking US money while supporting our enemies

Yes, because Trump always has a firm grip on the details, nuance and long term implications of his brain fart executive orders.

We won’t know until anything now. It’ll take time for the truth to reveal all of the crime that this 34x convicted criminal, his family & his administration have committed in their destruction of our governmental safe guards for protecting the public of the USA!

So, NO

Why would China do that?

You can't beat a "fulsome conversation". The US was in the midst of "fulsome conversations" with Iran when they, along with Bibi, launched massive unprovoked attacks. Trump is a master of "fulsome conversation" when he's not name-calling, whining, bragging or lying. Quite the conversationalist.

Big bowl of word salad simply to state: "no"

Xi flew in. Made a fool out of Trump and left. End of story. Now what about the Epstein files being held illegally?

We got two panda bears. That is all.

You think American troops should be allowed to murder Iranian schoolgirls with impunity? What the fuck is wrong with you? Iran has a right to defend itself, and China has a right to assist it in defending itself from aggression.

No. Next question. But next question to a capable politico.

In all caps - NO

Mike at least choose a few synonyms never nothing none slightly in no wise by no means nothing doing nowise noway on no account barely nowhere near scarcely hardly marginally narrowly

Does Trump know he had a fulsome conversation?

MAGGATS LIE

I'd expect our greateast president ever with sugar on top will let Xi know he doesn't hold the Mai Jong tiles.

So…no he didn’t

Like the President is such a bastion of truth and honesty.

That’s a no, then.

That would be a No.

Uh, that's a no.

To be admittedly petty but only with the best of intentions, the primary meaning of “fulsome” isn’t “wonderful” or “numerous” but more like “insincere” or “disingenuous.” Let’s take it that way this time.

Sycophantic yes-man @$$hole, plain and simple.

Should’nt Mike Waltz already have been briefed on what Trump discussed with Xi about Iran and this war? 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

They lie in all things. So this means somebody else is making the decisions and he is lying about who he’s gonna leave the decisions to 

TRANSLATION: NO FFS

"Fulsome“? I guess that covers all of it then… What a bunch of idiots.

Mike Waltz has resting liar face.

Why would Trump ask about 'small potatoes' issues?

So the answer is No.

He is too low in the pecking order, he doesn’t know anything.

Stopping China's support of Iran with this war? What's in it for Trump?! #MoneyTalks

So, no.

I guess I should not be surprised how many (if not all) MAGA men have no balls. They are absolute eunuchs.

The details of the talks - especially of any *actual* commitments - will never be publicized. Because there are no details to be shared. It was a one-way conversation, and all Trump contributed was "See my ballroom? See my vanity projects? Please tell everyone you admire them... 🙏"

I can't get over the gall of Americans demanding that China allow the USA get away with committing an even more egregious violation of international law and national sovereignty than Putin did in Ukraine.

This week on “The Lying Sacks of Shit Show” we go on another tiresome journey of denial and obfuscation with Mike Waltz.

Good, strong, fullsome concepts of plans were envisioned.

I think it might be an, "Uh, .... I don't know."

“Fulsome”.

That's a "No."

Yeah, he won't because the details of the conversation were about the ballroom and the arch and the columns on the White House. That's all grampa Donald talks about.

Xi pinky swore to not help Iran anymore.

Trump: Can you stop helping Iran? Xi: No Trump: OK. I was told I should ask. How about that seabass?

Absolutely embarrassing

They takjes about the weather, the White House and maybe golf. The women exchanged recepies and that was that. The fact is trump always starts threating but face to face hé is so small. Coward.

Trump wants to join the dictator club but the others say he isn't worthy yet. Keep trying Donald.

STRONG Surprising they haven’t just started bleaching their hair and wearing a combover at this point

"fulsome" prison blues.

Gonna have to look up fulsome.

Short and clear answer …..NO!!!!

So Trump likes communists now?

So No...

I guess Mike doesn’t know what the word “fulsome” means…or maybe he does?

Fulsome?!

He should be in Folsom.

So glad DEI wasn't in the room when all that ignorance was displayed...

I mean within the GOP, they didn’t learn this one by reading (they can’t), they just like watching torture on the tv

Same!

Maybe he used it correctly. Perhaps that is what they actually were.

Waltz is so bad at this like so many in this administration. Beyond stupid.

Um….maybe ‘wholesome conversation’??

"No. Also, I'm not even sure I'm using 'fulsome' correctly."

🤣

I listened to the exchange just to see if he actually used the word “fulsome.” It has two definitions, we can guess which one he meant, but still …

Gotta love those "strong" conversations.

That’s a NO

Doesn't "fulsome" mean that they praised China's actions?

😆

Blinking lies

Fulsome? 🤣🤣🤣

🤣🤣🤣🤣these fools forget the rest of us are not the dummies their cult is. When you can’t just simply say “YES” or “NO” to this question, the answer is definitely “hell f🤬cking NO!”

Exactly: the answer is "no." Trump has "raised this issue repeatedly," which means he has had zero impact. Increasingly, the Chinese must realize they can more or less ignore Trump.

Is there a rule that everyone has to put strong in the answer when talking about the president 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓

Everyone knows the Freudian slip, but what’s it called when you’re lying, but you unwittingly misuse a word in such a way that it makes what you say… less of a lie?

Fulsome? Hmm. “Full and well developed,” or “Aesthetically, morally, or generally offensive”?

Short answer: No.

The personification of the Republican Party. I guess the party of the problem, eh?

Otherwise, not a clue.

“I’m only the UN Ambassador. I don’t really do anything.”

Well we are still trying to get Xin cock out of Trump’s mouth to talk about that.

waltz needs to look up what "fulsome" means lmao

China will continue to support Iran. The relationship between China and Iran goes thousands of years back.

"I'll let the president lie to you about that one."

Of course not. Xi knows Trump is an idiot. He just flattered him, gave him something made out of gold and then said goodbye.

3RD OR 4TH DEFINITION?

as in excessive, oleaginous, smarmy, unctuous and oily.

this is what happens when only one guy makes all the decisions. i love this for them

If there was anything, they would be blowing the horns.

There has never been a "detail" come out of Trump's mouth that wasn't a lie.

That he hasn’t actually read.

So fulsome, as in excessive, oleaginous, smarmy, unctuous and oily.

A waste of air time.

So no?

Right the coverage legitimizes these fools to the dumbmies (dummies with a b).

In Chinese and other words, the answer was, don't make me laugh asking stupid questions, Donny.

Fun fact: Xi Jinping knows where Yrvmp’s bunker is located. ⚰️🪦🤣

The talks

people need to understand that 'fulsome' has two completely different meanings. i wonder which is meant here

Why would China do anything the US wants? The US Empire is collapsing and China is going to benefit the most. Nobody in their right mind thinks the US is a rational actor anymore. Even if the Democrats take power back they will not stop the war "israel" started.