Post

Didn't the SUPREME COURT pass a law saying a sitting President has immunity from all crimes committed?

It would be nice if we finally got something out of all the money we poured into Ken Starr.

It's not really about can he be; it's more will he be in the federal grand jury. It going to be the wording of his crimes. What he did against the rules.

Nice try bot. Now go back to X or Moscow.

Then Do It!!!

Yes Ken Starrs memo says yes, but SCOTUS has literally said otherwise by granting POTUS presidential immunity.

Well, he seemed to have been above the law last time. Let’s see if this time is any different…

“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are... contrary to, the president’s official duties. In this country, no one... is above the law.” --Kenneth Starr (May 13, 1998) === But now we have this pesky SCOTUS…

What are we waiting for

Talk is cheap. And we are growing very, very tired of people telling us “he can’t do that”, when he is, in fact, doing it. Take action or stfu

Don’t worry Scotus said they are immune. Waiting for Scotus to find the Democratic President exception.

Isn't that the same Ken Starr that defended Epstein?

That only applies to Democrats, as Voyeur Ken would be the first to agree.

Funny how Republicans were all for indicting Clinton over consensual adult sex but haul out that old Dixon OLC "can't indict" memo when it's their guy committing treason and forcing sex on minors.

He meant Democratic presidents

There's only one way to find out.

Tell that to Justice Roberts!

I bet Jonathon “anti-constitutionalist” Turley would disagree lol

great! but who in the entire present administration has the guts to order an investigation, conduct it, indict it & prosecute...let alone convict & sentence? THAT's the problem ..it's not what CAN be done, it's finding people with the courage to do their %&$* jobs & do what SHOULD be done

I am quite sure Ken Starr was only writing about Democrat presidents.

Get him!

Ken Starr meant Dem presidents who couldn‘t find charges to indict after a 4 year whitewater investigation, so Starr needed the House to impeach him for lying under oath in the civil lawsuit with Paula Jones that asked if he had an affair with 22 year old Monica Lewinsky .

He is not fit! Do this! Drive this message elsewhere!

If he can claim his 5th Amendment rights .. so can the 5th Amendment also be applied to Federal Grand Jury indictment. www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCbE...

We have all grown up on the belief that no one is above the law; tired of the top 1%ers flaunting their two-tier system.

The fact it is one of the reich wing lackies Ken Starr seals it.

But that was a Democratic president. The rules are different if you have a Republican president and a supplicant Supreme Court.

No one is above the law except lots of people.

get r' done! #jailTrump

Do it and let the courts sort it out.

Agreed! Spoken like a solid citizen who is Not a lawyer.

I’ve said it before, & I’ll say it again: We’ve had 1 sitting POTUS arrested (Grant) - for speeding on horse & buggy, of all things. If a sitting POTUS can be arrested, one can D@MN sure be indicted for - pedophilia - election interference - violating the emoluments clause - tax evasion

Only applies to Democrats!

Doesn't need to be DOJ. Can be a number of sources, the case can be tried by private attorneys (per Marc Elias) admitted to the federal bar. This has real possibilities, and the "immunity" issue doesn't actually come into it.

It's how you reel these shitheels in. Built into the constitution.

That memo is unfortunately nothing but outdated 20th century nonsense here in 2025.

The Roberts SCOTUS: Hold my beer, Ken Starr!

Not anymore.

Yea but SCOTUS nixed that idea

Seems relevant

Oh please we’ve been through this before, our weak government had the chance to stop him but they chose not to.

Yes- TRADITIONAL was avoided but it is NOT ABSOLUTE

If this is true,then wtf was Merrick Garland's problem in not prosecuting DJT' for insurrection, etc, etc, etc ???

Yeah but he was talking about a dem. Dump is a very special boy and Starr surely wouldn't mean for his opinion to apply the orange turd on that side of the isle

Trump is already above the law. He never gets any consequences.😡

Hey maybe it'll be like an Al Capone income tax evasion scenario and he'll get torn down

He only meant Clinton clearly

Nothing says 'incompetent' like 'long hidden legal memo' when it comes to crimes at the presidential level.

And, yet... here we sit.

What are we waiting for. ? 3 more years and we will be so broken there will be no coming back !

Yeah...but known is believing it

Great factoid! Precedent for arresting a prez who is endangering the public

If no one is above the law, why is a convicted felon, rapist & best friends with a pedo for 10 years in the WH as POTUS?

DO IT NOW you cowards!

Ken Starr? Is that the same Ken Starr who I found out was on Epstein payroll and he was his personal attorney defending him while these girls were abused?

MAGA: Hey, what's that? Me: GOP's petard.

Everything Trump does and says just emphasizes the Air Force's "Dereliction of Duty". Can't they figure out what to do about a "Domestic Enemy"? I have been fantasizing about an A-10 Warthog flying over a golf ⛳ course for months. Deliberately miss on the first pass. bsky.app/profile/umbr...

A simmering stew of disgrace.

100M chose not to vote!! 🤬

Properly tried and then properly hanged.

THE TRAITOROUS NINE!

This is beautiful poetry.

Its coming soon.

And you think republicans will indict Trump?

Why are these things hidden?

Let’s use this……. Fuck garland’s cowardice

Kenneth Starr today 🤦‍♂️🙄🧐😳🤷‍♀️

This raises a novel issue of law: Does a decision of the Supreme Court of Trump about presidential immunity "trump" a secret legal memo by a political hack if: (a) the hack is republican; or (b) if the hack is a democrat. Explain your answer in a 10-word shadow docket ruling.

No paywall www.nytimes.com/2017/07/22/u...

Be carefull! Vance is getting into position!

That quote is no longer operative

That was before the Supreme Court tore up our Constitution.

There's a legal hotfoot... and from Kenneth Starr no less. Let's throw Jack Smith's case to the wall and see if it sticks..

Let's see if we can turn the tables. Worth a shot.

If any and I mean any president deserves to be impeached it’s tRump without question.

But that was before our Corrupt 6 on SCOTUS determined, based on NOTHING in the constitution, tRump should be immune.

But Not For Republicans! They Are Saintly Slimeballs!

Yep, can see Bondi upholding the law.

Unless they are a Republican......

It would really be karma if Donald Trump is taken down by a memo written to take down Bill Clinton courtesy of Kenneth Starr, who was also one of Jeffrey Epstein's first lawyers when his troubles began

Meally-mouthed hand wringers-

"No - that was then, this is now." - Ken Starr

Kenneth Starr said this?

Bill Clinton’s Kenneth Starr?

WHY NOT? HE’S A FUCKING CRIMINAL!

Couldn't agree more, but then there is Trump v. United States (2024)

Except when it is a republican.

Kenneth Starr was a hypocrite and a self-righteous asshole.

Do it! Do it! Do it!

I wonder how Lindsey Graham of South Carolina feels about the #EpsteinFiles. bsky.app/profile/chee... @postandcourier.bsky.social. @thestate.com

Imagine a society that poses itself such a question and still considers itself democratic. Laughable, right?

We are anxiously waiting that day. Either that or Big Mac Does it job…..

The problem is that the justice department is controlled by the president. Right now, Congress is not going to appoint a special counselor.

Despite what trump is trying to sell us, and that history has let to DOJ basically ignoring, an 1998 reading suggests that when a man in the White House committs grieveous crimes, he is NOT above the law. We may have to fight this out again..in court.

DO IT. NOW.

Other countries arrest the criminal leaders for a lot less than what agent orange has done ✅

but he has a get out of jail free card

They may be scraps or they may be we don't see the patterns and changes. It's not easy to assess, but I do know they did not give Trump unlimited immunity. I read the ruling, and they gave themselves the power to determine what is and isn't "official business". Maybe worse, actually. Maybe better. ?

What are we WAITING ON!!!! Oh that’s right we NO LONGER have a functioning DOJ. Under the Orange Mussolini it has been converted to his Personal Defense Law Firm!!

It is stuff like this that helps me to know that one day we will see the back of the great orange buffoon, once and for all.

Yes, indicted can also be imprisoned and can also be executed for crimes against America. Let's see this through to its completion.To guarantee this republican fckry can never happen again.

Well, they just shot him down on the use of the Guard in Chicago. They aren't in his pocket - some are in other people's pockets but not his. He's too cheap.

That's not what the corrupt SCOTUS said...

Trump is not worried; he has never been held accountable for any of the corrupt crimes he and his administration have committed, including January 6th, starting a riot, selling top-secret documents Maralogo to Russia and Saudi Arabia. Thank you Biden adminstration for not doing your job

trump the criminal felonious pedophilic rapist belongs in prison.

And according to the GQP, the bar is at least as low as lying about a blowjob, something NOT in the PUTOS's job description.

Turns out, Ken Starr was wrong. And now he's dead.

I believe the founders would have bitch slapped anyone who thinks the president can't be indicated. Of course he can. This isn't a serious question. Of course he can.

(meme from 2016 when he said he was "indicated")