Post

Everyone should be extremely concerned that birthright citizenship was 5-4 and not unanimous.

5.4K reposts24K likes

For those asking whether it was 5-4 or 6-3: bsky.app/profile/chri...

Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Fourteenth Amendment protects birthright citizenship, blocking Donald Trump's executive order to end it. Roberts has the opinion for the court, which is 5-4 on the constitutional question and 6-3 on whether federal law protects birthright citizenship.

Honestly, this sets the bar for the impeachments two days after the midterms. Six members of the the Supreme Court of the United States voted to let an executive order override the plain text of a constitutional amendment. And yes, at this point, I think SCOTUS needs the bench cleared before Trump.

Oh, so the constitution and amendments mean even less and law is the highest order, unless these justices don't like the law and then strike it down because of some bullshit retconning of the constitution. Just undermining confidence in the rule of law all over the place.

The Dobbs decision did that. This just adds to the evidence that some of the justices have the goal of turning our country into a white fascist theocracy.

Yes, like Alito & Thomas pretend to be "originalists" & that the words of the Constitution are inviolate, UNLESS Drumpf doesn't like them, then the Constitution & the 14th Amendment be damned & thrown under the bus to give Drumpf his ilegal way.

The system is in place to revoke the law licenses of Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito for conflicts of interest. Unfortunately we must wait for congress to swing democrat so new traitors are not added to the court. #disbarscotus

Let's keep it real,yes the 5-4 decision on the Constitutional question is shocking but it was never going to be 9-0 because Alito and Thomas will always go against the rights of the common citizens,

bsky.app/profile/chri... And this...they just need one more. Expand the court.

Chris Hayes@chrislhayes.bsky.social

The thing you need to understand is that there are 2 (TWO) different method for amending the constitution 1) The process laid out in the constititon itself (conventions, or 2/3's of both houses followed by 3/4 of states ratifying) OR 2) find five votes on the Supreme Court.

I think that Kavanaugh's reliance on the statute instead of the 14th Amendment somehow leaves the door open for Congress to nullify the statute and suddenly the birthright is taken away. A tortured and invalid way to view the law.

The 4 the voted for, aka corrupt justice, should lose their citizenship (hey, its only right to apply what they voted for others).....!! Rules are rules..... if they wanted this to apply to others, they should be okay with it applying to THEM....!! Deport them, they are illegal criminal.

Family hails from Scotland, Ireland & Germany. There are family rumors of Indigenous blood*. I should be deported by this logic. I’m proud of all of it. *Skin-wise I’m definitely European. Auburn hair, grey eyes, pale flesh. Brother (proven by DNA to be full) was ”native”, dark skin, eyes & hair.

shazam!! I did not expect unanimous but I agree, it should have been as unanimous a decision as any other unanimous decision in history. example: Brown v. Board of Ed was unanimous. and guess what: the principal behind that decision was rooted in the 14th Amendment.

bsky.app/profile/otro... My version of the legal opinion: "The #USConstitution states it very clearly"

Eliana@otrodia.bsky.social

And why did the useless treasonous bigoted pendejos @ #SCOTUS need 194-pages to assert this basic principle of the #USConstitution? #FuckTrump #FuckTheGOP FUCK #SCOTUS

We've known for a while that "the 4" dislike the Constitution and democracy, and see them as problems to be eliminated. The only solution would be to expand the Court. Many well-run civilized nations have supreme courts that are 15 or 20 strong, and experience no problems.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the USA can lock people away in ICE detention without a hearing or medical care, and their children born in ICE custody are US citizens who have all the rights and privileges we afford anyone else born in any of our other prisons.

Shame anyone who promotes Alito! Watch the World Cup! Open your minds to seeing all who have participated. They are just like us! Any corrupt governments that plot to harm us are merely a mirror of what is happening to this country now from inside OUR White House!

Everyone paying attention knows that removing thomas, alito, kavanaugh, and gorsuch from SCOTUS is an absolute must. roberts and barrett have to be at least neutered as well.

Trump & his GOP Congressional Stooges Chorus' actions have been a string-no a rope-of betrayal after betrayal of US Constitutional Democracy & basic human decency. The GOP Federalist Supreme Court Justices have greased their Anti-Democracy bulldozer- I've NOT stopped being extremely concerned.

The "textualists" decided that "subject to the jurisdiction" actually means "has political allegiance to". Maybe we should be giving them the test where you have to recognize a lion and draw the face of a clock.

Not surprised because they are mostly Trump ass lickers. I’ve been concerned the day Trump got to pick Supreme Court judges. Stupid Americans elected an evil narcissistic, pedophile rapist to run our country and a lot of the votes came from the very people he has targeted.

Need to look what it takes - and right now when they own all 3 branches not going to happen … and could our voters make that a priority instead of their own pet issues … we should but sadly doubt they will…

IN reality, its this "Shadow docket" where so many cases are heard and decided too quickly. Many don't even have opinions written. Having this do nothing congress decide what cases to hear is not a solution; it would all be based on a purely political bias (not like its not now)

agree on shadow docket misuse. that said, right now I 100% think this do nothing Congress not selecting cases to go to the supreme Court is exactly what we need. If you don't want Congress deciding, what about the district courts deciding what goes to the Supreme Court?

Make it 100 justices. With term limits. Spread them out as a preliminary level of scotus,1 revolving panel for each circuit. Next level is effectively an en banc by unanimous consent. Totally guts the politics and impact of a selection or depoartyre of a justice.

The system is in place to revoke the law licenses of Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito For conflict of interest. Unfortunately we must wait for congress to swing democrat so new traitors are not added to the court. #disbarscotus

At this point we need to pack the court. I don’t care if we have 1000 justices, these Supreme Court judicial supremacist and this death cult need to be stopped by any means necessary.

Reorganize the Court into something resembling a federal judicial district. Appoint a SCOTUS of 21 justices. Any three might be randomly selected to hear a case. If either of the parties is unhappy with the decision, they can get a hearing by the full court.

Honestly I like the idea. But until we can get some reform there, Packing the court will have to be our immediate solution because it the only idea that doesn’t need 60 senate votes at least, (not counting veto override).

Thirteen justices would be logical, then, considering that there are 13 federal judicial districts with only 9 SCOTUS overseers now available to monitor them. But the only thing Democrats can do till 2029 is cut SCOTUS funding till John Roberts deigns to respond to a congressional subpoena.

A CLEAR reminder that this court needs an overhaul. One where both the people sitting on it & their practices are examined in full view & reworked so that corruption can no longer thrive over our Constitutional rights.

Yes! (1) It’s very clearly written in the Constitution; there was never a question about the meaning. (2) One can’t get rid of something in the Constitution by executive order. Why was there even any question about this?

Someone FINALLY said it…it’s been hours and this is the FIRST time I’ve seen a post acknowledging that glaring fact. I’ve screamed myself hoarse in the car listening to CNN on Sirius because every analyst just says it was a no-brainer that Trumps attempt would fail 🤦🏻‍♂️

Our country is being led by white nationalist & far-right extremist. Sadly, we have SCOTUS judges who evidently allign with this ideology. White Nationalist 'advocate for the mass deportation of non-white populations—even those born in the U.S.' It's crucial to the white washing of our country.

What's odd is that the US, Canada, and Mexico, most of South America, and only, I believe, 2 other countries have "birthright citizenship". No countries in Europe. I'm not a conservative, but I don't think simply being born on, say, US soil you should automatically become a US citizen.

And how can anyone come to that collusion…..I mean conclusion? Sarcasm for obvious reasons. bsky.app/profile/lala...

Omg. WTF is Happening?@lalahaenzy.bsky.social

Firstly: get hearing aids Secondly: you were most definitely meeting with house GOP leadership, I.e Mike Johnson. Thirdly: you’re about to strike down birthright citizenship. Fourthly: stop with the absolute ghoulish smile on your miserable face Fifthly: I believe Anita Hill #Pinks #ProudBlue

He has absolute contempt for all of us. Why did they thank him and call him sir. The people he met with call him boy behind his back. Just jiving his way back to the Supreme Court to sell out anyone who isn’t white. How much did it cost to buy his soul.

A primer for the 4 “justices” that dissented, the process for nullifying a constitutional amendment is to propose and pass another constitutional amendment. I know that seems hard with supermajorities and all but that was the point. This concludes my TED talk. Thanks for your attention to this………

Those 4 persons wanted to give Trump the power to change the constitution! Those 4 persons need to be removed from the Supreme Court. They no longer serve America. Those #SCROTUMS serve Trump. If a Dem had tried this, those 4 would be lecturing the Dem on what a constitutional amendment is.

It is worrisome because the 14th Amendment is crystal CLEAR and there is nothing for the four dissenters to equivocate about as the language is clear. It is no more cloudy than the 5th's "NO PERSON (my caps) shall be deprived of life, liberty or property WITHOUT THE PROCESS OF LAW" (my caps, again)!

Autocrats argue the constitution shouldn't exist. Rising fascism worldwide inspired me to write an allegorical series on its perils: unjust war; failed democracy/climate crisis; race-based oppression; persecution of others. Get The Antunite Chronicles at: amazon.com/dp/B0B1JNBCTK?

amazon.comThe Antunite ChroniclesVisit Amazon's The Antunite Chronicles Page and shop for all The Antunite Chronicles books. Check out pictures, author information, and reviews of The Antunite Chronicles

I hear you. But the core question before the Court was: “Can Trump’s executive order stand?” The answer was no, by a 6–3 vote. Justice Kavanaugh joined the majority in striking down the executive order. Suits me. Anything else is pure speculation.

Trump is already telegraphing that he will have the Congress write up a bill for his signature and we will be off once again to revisit the issue in the courts. Plain meaning doesn't matter, neither does amending the Constitution properly.

Since when has something being bogus ever stopped that nutjob... This is how he does things, ignore the law, issue imperial decrees via EOs or social media, waits to get sued and then relies on the SC to rubber stamp whatever violation he is trying.

It’s purely speculative what he would have said in a different case not tied to a specific executive order. In this instance, Kavanaugh relied on a separation-of-powers and institutional authority rationale rather than rejecting the Constitution itself, in my view.

He literally didn't join the other 5 on saying it was against the Constitution when it very explicitly is. It's not even a question. And when you have 3 Justices saying it is perfectly Constitutional and fine, that matters. He made a very deliberate decision here to separate himself.

Frightening to think the others are judges. Anywhere else in the World the location of your birth is you citizenship. The Cult exists in the Supreme Court

The 3 desenters have all gone on a vacation with millionaires money so dems should take note ..... come after midterms excellent place to begin the weekly investigations indictments and impeachments. Give the law and order party some law and order. 🥂

I suspect they coordinate some of these to avoid the interparty backlash. They draw straws or something as to decide who gets to rule with the actual law. Since it seems random who joins with the liberals.

Any sentient being has been extremely concerned for 10 years since 77 million magats happily voted in this abomination of a regime. SCOTUS is only one thing, albeit a big one, to be on high alert about.

A biased Supreme Court Justice does not look after the needs of all Americans. Appeasing any leader never ends with just one ruling.

Ha, I've been saying the same thing all morning. The Constitution is VERY clear about birthright citizenship, and justices who were abiding by their oaths should have told the occupant of the Oval to f*k all the way off with his BS. And 4 didn't.

It’s incredible that three justices said it was ok for the President to just say he was going to change this part of the constitution by executive order. His say so. That was the issue in this case. Not just birth right citizenship but The Presidents power to say what constitutes that exactly.

Our 1 shot is for Dems to win back both chambers of Congress in November. Only then will WE be able to hold any of these corrupt politicians accountable, stop - or at least slow down - the MAGA-train of authoritarianism, and impeach & remove POTUS & MAGA-SCOTUS. Power to The People! #Midterms

And Kavanaugh, writes how to get around it with Congress, which is the same thing he did with the tariffs and Trump followed exactly what Kavanaugh said, one of the rapist on the Supreme Court

You think with those crooked white nationalist white supremacist KKK Supreme Court justices that we should be surprised at this?! No, no surprises whatsoever.

That was my take but then, the Federalist Society was created to take down the Constitution, and we know the 14th Amendment has been optional for the last several years. A country without a court is not a country, it's a shit show.

The last expansion was done to have the number of Justices match the number of Appeals Courts. I believe that we have 13 Appeals Courts currently. The expansion is purely a Congressional matter, no amendment needed. Now , Judicial terms is tougher, because the Constitution may grant lifetime.

You know, every one of them stood up there and swore an oath to uphold and protect the constitution. If they lied on those oaths they should be removed from the office.

We need to start making some new Constitutional Amendments. Presidents aren’t above the law. Can be prosecuted. Get dark money out of elections. I Could go on and on. We need to QUIT leaving shit up to SCOTUS.

Four ninths of SCOTUS have proved they are unfit to be judges let alone members of the supreme court. The USA is so close to unrecoverable fucked as a democracy.

I find it interesting that some justices want to limit clear language of the 14th Amendment by looking at historical context. They should do the same with the Second Amendment’s reference to a militia when no standing army existed at the time.