Post

I am not, I just think of the Kelsey Berreth case every time I see you post. Totally unfair to you. So sorry about that.

Please add 1. bookmark feature 2. copy and paste another post, not just text..

Cool contraction of FOAF.

Love it! ✌️

Why?

I wish you luck, but the AI ties with the Custodians makes this a no for me. I do agree that this is what the AT Protocol is about though. So again, good luck.

Cypherpunk 2.0 who would have said it

As first to use #FreeOurFeeds as Twitter hashtag (2/12/21), it's a joy to see this - imminent prospect to realize promise Bluesky will be hard to enshittify (providing easy exit with negligible loss of service). Good luck @freeourfeeds.com & @bsky.app.

Social media should be by the people and for the people 😊

The fact that this not only matters to you but that you're actively promoting it shows me I've landed in the right place. 🙂 👏

The nature of atproto that Bluesky is built on makes this less of a problem due to the ability to run your own personal data server (PDS) and still take part in the ecosystem. @freeourfeeds.com has all the same posts because it's participating in the atproto network. 1/4

You should do like the orca and wear a salmon

inciativa muito boa paulinho mas muito difícil de entender por uma rede de usuários que não entenda ou trabalhe com e sobre tecnologia, inclusive eu não entendi

So independent parallel networks operate as checks and balances? I see how that works. It’s basic, fascinating, and fundamental at the same time. I haven’t explored the beyond yet. I like it here thanks to you and Jay.

No, because your subscribed moderation can just hide the post for the people subscribed to it. Currently everyone is hard coded to be subscribed to Bluesky Moderation, but in the future you could subscribe to any moderation service that fits you and your needs.

As it stands, it seems one appview=one client. Is the intention that the client should be able to handle multiple appviews? Or is the intention moreso that each lexicon has a reference appview implementation, and anyone can host an interoperable instance? If the latter, how is the client expected to

Or start getting rumors that you're some kinda cyborg

I mean, you guys are all really late to the party:

When you do go full shoe chapeau suggest you go talk to Vermin Supreme about being his running mate. verminsupreme.com But you damn well better deliver on the free ponies!!

Important questions first: What kind of shoe? Preferred size and color? Just want to be prepared. (Fun aside, I am glad that you are preparing for the day you may decide you actually want to sh*t all over the playground the way certain people have done/are planning to do.)

Until there's private posting, that is indeed the point - because we want to ensure no company tries to own the public space

checking my rolodex

I, for one, welcome our shoehat overlords

But what if WANT to wear shoehats??? Check and mate....

Shoehat implies the existence of pantsshirt which sounds amazing, frankly

The height of avant garde fashion www.metmuseum.org/art/collecti...

We've designed the network so as many orgs as are interested can operate it. I tend to think of it like term limits. Every org corrupts eventually. That's why we make leadership dynamic

I think that recent events have made it all the more clear - it's important that we take what we have here, scatter all around the world, yet remain in touch using the protocol. Easy to affect one data repository or AppView; near impossible with a world-wide web of them.

Don’t fight the trend, Paul.

I gotcha, bro.

Where do we get these shoehats?

Ha, that explains it. I saw the top post, scrolled down and suddenly everyone is just talking about SHOE HATS. 😂

*one

Word.

"one" company. Too bad you can't edit it, :D

Explain please.

badass

Proof of kit being fine 🫵🏻

Google Play search for E-Play free music software

Huh?

there could be discrepancies as each operator would be allowed to make their own choices about which servers to accept or reject as part of the network. i would expect it to be virtually the same though

📌

With this and the Mastodon news I had some minor joy today.

The two systems are organized completely differently, so the answer is both “yes” and “no” depending on exactly what you mean

FOF is a band…Fame on Fire!

🫡

we'll do our best to be great stewards during our time!

📌

That's cool as hell. Y'all doing a good job.

Fuck. YEAH!!!

But to clarify, I'm also loving these pictures of shoehats!

Think of it like this: A representative democracy depends on there being candidates to choose between. FOF is becoming one of those candidates.

📌

Too bad one of their founders is an AI bro pushing an LLM startup. Can't have shit on Al Gore's internet these days.

Search for Fediverse and see if helps!

Stellar 😎

same

Someone will always be in charge and someone will always have access to the info though

There's lots of them on the network!

Bluesky is, yes. AT is, yes. This foundation is talking about creating a bevvy of new social media applications built on AT. I would rather see githubs for AT-youtube, AT-tiktok, AT-instagram etc, rather than just a nebulous "foundation" that is just collecting money.

Stuff like this gives me hope for the future of our community 💙

🔖