Post

Thread. I've found Bluesky engaging, fun and *alive* since the first day I got here, in part because I went out of my way to engage with it, not just expect some algorithm to platform what I do. Also because, fundamentally, I'm here to be social, not just to market, and that has a long-term effect.

Greg Pak@gregpak.net

Worth noting that most of the people who say Bluesky is dead or useless are journalists, not organizers. Bluesky has been OUTSTANDING for me as an organizer. I've raised THOUSANDS of dollars here, gotten HUNDREDS of people to actual events, gotten LOADS of people to DO POLITICAL THINGS.

165 reposts1.5K likes

It's also been great for some existing communities and subcultures, like fandoms. A lot of the MLP/brony community moved here when Twitter started getting even worse, and with a few central figures connecting everyone and reposting a lot, there has been no need for an Algorithm. 1/2

Social networking, in the old fashioned sense of the word, has enabled discovery and connection without mediation/meddling by the platform. Like some other people have said, for me it was basically rediscovering that social media can be rewarding and fun again. 2/2

I think you are on point with why many big names (brands) are disappointed. For me as a lurker both on Twitter and here, there's not much of a difference. I follow people and subjects that interest me and don't give a rat's ass about followers.

I was never on twitter so the BlueSky paradigm took me a bit to get used to. I love it! I follow history nerds, writers I like, lots of cats. we interact! we joke! we admire each others cute pets. we are kind of living in a parasocial world now, so might as well lean in. 😜

I was really sad when a lot of the microcommunities in Twitter dissolved, but some of them reformed over here. Science nerds are over here, albeit not at heavy as it was. The leftist firing squad stuff it annoying but dramatically lower after blocking a handful of key instigators.

I don't sell anything but I get me cats, me sewing machines, artists, educators, psychologists, ND people and various journalists and random people to chat with. I like it here.

The people who say it's dead here are the ones trying to profit not socialize I'm not trying to make a buck here, I just enjoy engaging with people I find interesting. As such, this is the best platform I've found.

DEATH tapped the screen "Blue sky attracts me precisely because it's not just doom scrolling, it's engaging, fun, it's a safe place" WAR smiled "Bit of a bubble then?" PESTILENCE coughed "Well I enjoy it here, salad anyone?" FAMINE nibbled a taco "It's a nice place to wait for Har Megiddo, quieter"

It is my happy place. Does being here achieve anything? That's the point. No. But it feels good. DEATH polished the scythe blade "I do like this ceramic edge, smooth, less time for pleading" WAR grunted "I am more of a rusty knife fan, lots of blood & screaming" FAMINE sipped a tea "Tsuki No Kokora"

I sometimes feel a little snarky about people who declare this site dead, and want to say "skill issue, dude," but in all honesty my feed and my comments have always been hopping here, so... kinda a skill issue, maybe? Sure, I'm *known,* but a lot of these other dudes are equally known, so...?

I've honestly picked up more followers here than anywhere else in the social media sphere. You have to put yourself out there and you will reap the rewards on here if you do that.

Being decidedly *not* known, I’ve noticed quite a drop off in activity since I joined. But I’m still finding new people of interest (photographers or artists or authors), so it’s definitely not “dead.” And I find Facebook absolutely unreadable now, just a firehose of stuff I have no interest in.

You have 360K+ followers and say genuinely interesting things frequently. I have 400+ followers and say things that might be interesting to different niches depending on what I post, but my reach isn't sufficient to find those niches. We have very different experiences (not that X is better).

Perhaps the issue other people have is that it looks *just* like Twitter, so people assume it's just like Twitter, and not a teachable moment about what Twitter shows you and what it doesn't.

For me personally, one thing that kills my desire to engage with a post I otherwise would is when it is very clearly a lazy copy-paste (or worse, a cross-post service) from Twitter. Which I've seen a lot of "known" accounts try to do, leaving twitter @ tags in and all.

Bluesky is a 'choose your own adventure' book. These folks failed the 'turn to page 12' and didn't like their chosen outcome. You pick what you see and engage with here. Block like a madman if you must, to improve your experience...

Definitely skill issue. I’m a (I think) mostly benevolent reply guy and have 0 expectations for engagement/followers. But I’m always looking for people who have interesting things to say. The people who complain are just not interesting and miss their little Xitter circle jerks.

I'm not particularly famous and I'm still having more fun here than I was at Twitter by the time I left it, with more meaningful engagement than I had there (and at least fewer trolls to block)

Platt's Place horseradish dill pickle. Spicy enough to clear your sinuses out without killing your tastebuds, it enhanced whatever sandwich you were having with it (which for me was usually a marvelous overstuffed chicken salad club on rye.)

The thing that helped get my Bluesky experience off to a good start was that so many people from my Twitter feed, especially people I know in person, migrated here as soon as the place went live.

To be fair... you were on someone essentials list to follow and so I did, especially recognizing an author I had read in the past. Following you did encourage me go back and read Old Man's War. I already owned paper back so I guess no real new revenue until I read your latest.

BTW I place a great deal of value in your recommendations of other authors to follow. I think such referrals seem to carry more weight here for me as opposed to the other site, in which I have abandoned.

I think you engage positively with your comments and the people in the community here. That doesn't mean you don't ban people who are being jerks or whatever, but if people come to you politely, in good faith and respectfully, you seem to return the same back to them, which is more than some.

Basically, yeah. I'm here to socialize and most people are cool, so it works out, and we all mostly have fun. The rare person who rolls up to start a fight finds themselves on the other side of the "don't engage, just block" wall pretty quickly.

I will admit, I have never understood the appeal of having a "conversation" just for the purpose of trying to start a fight. That's just not a useful or rewarding way to interact with people in my view. I would much rather work with people than against them, it's just better for everyone.

It's only "dead" because blocking works. It's like a bar that fratboys call "lame" because the bouncers kick them out when they creep on women.

I think it’s that they don’t know how to create topic-based follow feeds. Building that made my entire experience better, because when I want to learn something, or giggle mindlessly, check in on news, hear those who share a particular interest, or think deeply, each feed I’ve built, supports that.

I literally have a “Frivolity” Feed (of which you are a part, BTW). I’m never bored here, and it also never feels like some firehose of info that one can’t keep track of. And I can enjoy who *I* want to see and engage with, without having some algorithm constantly stepping on my (virtual) nads.

It’s also a THOUSAND times better at controlling #ConflictBots. Custom feeds mean they never really roll up on you in swarms like they do on Bad Twitter™, and when you slap one down, they are GONE from your digital life for REAL.

I find much to like about BlueSky and visit/read regularly. I don't participate much, but then my entire "participation" on the socials in general has declined. Ennui, maybe. But also, I don't care what anyone else says about the viability of the platform. It suits me. I use FB and this. That's it.

Right, it is so non-toxic in here. Even when you have trolls coming to try and "own" people on bluesky or "try to get the most blocks" they just get laughed out of the sphere and we all forget they existed.

Yes! (lol the irony of nodding while reading this tricking my brain into thinking I’d replied ages ago xD) The few times I get annoyed/annoying interactions I’ve sort of brought it on myself bc I swear, this time wading into a bluewave big follows mentions will be different. Hah.

I mean I read one of your books a while back, but I've really enjoyed your posts. Posts about random everyday stuff. Commiserating about having to run the trash out in the morning. A lot of authors go a different direction in their posting and it is not relatable. People like real people.

Never saw the need for Twitter, and I forget how I ended up here—but it’s not hard to find people to follow whose interests and sense of humor match mine or who have political news I wouldn’t ordinarily encounter, even though I read widely.

I created lists of people so I don't follow anyone. By having lists, I can easily see authors or crafts or publishing pros & the ones I call 'talkers' if I want to see news. It makes it simple to dip in, get updates from folks, then dip out. I only do socials for maybe 30 min/day max.

During a conversation with my boss yesterday, I mentioned in passing that I was on BlueSky, he said 'oh that site is so happy clappy' 😕 Er no it isn't boss, must have been a while since you visited 🤭

I do enjoy Bluesky. My lady friend has become annoyed by me texting her things I think about, so I just post them here. I also learn useful things and stay abreast of current trends. Just today I learned a new word "Cockwomble". I am really looking forward to putting it to use.