Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes
Jonathan Portes
@jdportes.bsky.social
Professor of Economics and Public Policy, King's College London; Senior Fellow, UKICE. Immigration, economics, public policy. Personal views only; usual disclaimers apply. https://jonathandportes.github.io/
66.6K followers742 following8.1K posts
Jonathan Portes reposted
“1,431 people, including at least 300 children and 130 women, have been killed since the US-brokered ceasefire deal began in October 2025 and Israel is aiming to "destroy, in whole or in part, the Palestinians in Gaza". news.sky.com/story/un-rep...
Jonathan Portes reposted
I think it doesn't reflect well on the BBC that one its leading presenters is allowed to write an 'analysis' for a highly partisan newspaper which includes lines like "Racial minorities, worshipped by white Democrats" www.dailymail.com/news/article...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
Replying to @sundersays.bsky.social
Home Office press office: "The speech doesn’t say the policy will deliver £10bn in savings. It says the status quo will cost £10bn" before quoting the bit of the speech that says the policy will deliver £10 bn in savings! "If we do not, we will see a £10 billion pound drain on our public finances…”
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
Can't read the article - this publication has churned out so much shit in the last couple of years I would not dream of subscribing to it - but this is a very poor bit of promotion for it. The worst I've seen since their incompetent and unhinged attack on Acemoglu.
The chancellor resembles a hapless coach at a football club whose megalomaniac chairman picks the team each week. How long can this “bald fraud” prosper? bit.ly/4icXOm1 Illustration: Nate Kitch
Jonathan Portes reposted
Replying to @sundersays.bsky.social
A government which had confidence in its arguments about fiscal impacts could surely give factual answers to straight factual questions bsky.app/profile/sund...
Stella Creasy asked 3 straight questions. - When do fiscal contributions + fiscal costs arise? - What impact does that have on the fiscal rules for 5 years? - How much would the proposed delay save (or not?) Was simply sent the £10 billion link, which appears irrelevant to these proposed reforms
Jonathan Portes reposted
Replying to @sundersays.bsky.social
The Home Office told me at the time that the claim of a £10 billion "lifetime cost" (£9.5 billion) did not mean the Home Sec meant the government's proposals would save that £9.5 billion, but would not say what fiscal difference the government's proposals would make. bsky.app/profile/sund...
The Home Office told me 3 weeks ago, this is not a claim the reforms save this £10 billion [in 3 decades, not 3-5 years] but govt won't tell MPs & peers if there is a fiscal saving (or cost) & how much it is & when www.politico.eu/article/uk-l...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
Debt scare stories are a distraction. My take on what a serious, "responsible" Budget actually look like: [Tax reform, employment support, migration, etc.] zeteo.uk/p/this-is-wh...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
once again a criminal says the loud bit out loud regarding the one actual use of cryptocurrency - crime once again regulators and governments will ignore it
Israeli PM Netanyahu says Israel should prepare for mounting international sanctions and use cryptocurrency in order to circumvent them, in shockingly blunt remarks regarding the state of the country’s economy less than a week before the Knesset election. www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-is...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Thinking about the practicalities - the four freedoms make sense as a package because the movement of goods and services are facilitated by movement of capital and labour. And countries have different endowments and comparative advantages, so there needs to be benefits for all.
Also FoM is a red line for the EU and I don't think the Euro or Schengen would be.
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
Why EU free movement is an opportunity, not a threat – as Burnham makes the case, read @johnspringford.bsky.social for Arguably. “It is strange to reject one of the few policies that we know would raise growth and improve our fiscal position.” www.arguably.uk/p/eu-free-mo...
I don't disagree with anything in this by @jemima.bsky.social but I think it underplays the issue by treating these people as a bit of a joke. As she says, the UK is not hurtling towards a civil war. That doesn't mean there isn't a genuinely dangerous agenda here. ukandeu.ac.uk/civil-war-in...
The right’s obsession with ‘civil war’ in Britain ft.trib.al/XUcjIab
Debt scare stories are a distraction. My take on what a serious, "responsible" Budget actually look like: [Tax reform, employment support, migration, etc.] zeteo.uk/p/this-is-wh...
Jonathan Portes reposted
It takes a leap of faith to think that the post WW2 growth rates are coming back any time soon, so these long term charts aren't all that helpful in understanding where we now are. (The article below is however excellent).
This is just dreadful stuff from Kuenssberg: "What has the government done to cut the national debt?" ONS: "Public sector net debt was provisionally estimated at 94.0% of GDP, 0.7 percentage points lower than a year earlier"
I tried to explain here what an honest, responsible budget would look like - tax reform, employment support, and sensible migration policies.. zeteo.uk/p/this-is-wh...
Jonathan Portes reposted
“Restricting migration by people who will work and pay taxes will weaken the tax base.” @jdportes.bsky.social argues a responsible Budget requires honest choices on tax, public services, investment and migration. Read more here and subscribe: zeteo.uk/p/this-is-wh...
Jonathan Portes reposted
It’s so telling that Robin Ince has used the word ‘openly’ here. Any time I write a piece in the Scottish press that’s supportive of trans folk it unleashes a tidal wave of hate and threats that lasts for days. It is a deliberate exercise in silencing support and further isolating trans people.
Jonathan Portes reposted
Free movement as part of a future UK-EU relationship has more support when linked to benefits to trade and opportunities for UK citizens My blog based on new @britishfuture.bsky.social research for @freemovement.bsky.social 👇👇👇
🧵 1. Would the UK public accept free movement as part of a closer relationship with the EU? New British Future research suggests support depends on whether it brings benefits to trade and opportunities for UK citizens.
Jonathan Portes reposted
A significant shift, however much the circular migration point is overdone. Here's my piece on why this matters from two weeks ago www.arguably.uk/p/eu-free-mo...
The real inversion is Burnham defending freedom of movement on merits, to the benefit of Britons; rather than a "price to be paid" for market access. For the first time by a PM since.... 2004...?
Jonathan Portes reposted
Replying to @sundersays.bsky.social
Yet the Labour government took that trade-off without discussing it! This time, ministers were unaware of pace + price of reduction. (They did in 2024-25c want to go from 650k to < 250k: its much less clear they are heading to < 100k and to zero in 2026 on purpose!) bsky.app/profile/sund...
Net migration will be about or over 200k lower - the lower migration scenario here vs 350 baseline (It is dipping to 50k to zero in 2026, it may come back to 100k by 2028-29) "The lower migration scenario has the opposite effect with borrowing and debt £13.1 billion and 2.5 per cent of GDP higher.
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
Mahmood’s immigration minister, Jo White: “I don’t want us to get into that spiral where people move out of the care sector because they’ve got leave to remain.” In other words, keep them on insecure visas as bonded labourers. I think she just doesn't like them.
"The Home Office has identified a new problem with migrant care workers. The people presented as a burden on Britain because they earn too little have become so indispensable that they must be prevented from finding a better or higher-paid job." ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Replying to @jdportes.bsky.social
My earlier piece on this topic: www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/724...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Replying to @flipchartrick.bsky.social
As @gabyhinsliff.bsky.social says, you’ll never satisfy the far right. They’ve gone from banging on about EU migrants to attacking people who aren’t white. Whatever happens to the migration stats, the bigots will just keep moving the target. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Exactly my thought when I first heard the policy. If you want people to integrate, don’t keep them hanging around for 15 years with the threat of deportation hanging over them. 5 years is fair and plenty long enough. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...
Jonathan Portes reposted
"The Home Office has identified a new problem with migrant care workers. The people presented as a burden on Britain because they earn too little have become so indispensable that they must be prevented from finding a better or higher-paid job." ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Jonathan Portes reposted
“When the people concerned are being told that their contribution is insufficient to deserve settlement, yet apparently too important to allow them to leave their occupation, the contradiction becomes clear.”
"The Home Office has identified a new problem with migrant care workers. The people presented as a burden on Britain because they earn too little have become so indispensable that they must be prevented from finding a better or higher-paid job." ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
"The Home Office has identified a new problem with migrant care workers. The people presented as a burden on Britain because they earn too little have become so indispensable that they must be prevented from finding a better or higher-paid job." ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Click the link. Deliberate choice of photo? Your call.
Jonathan Portes reposted
Have now written about this at greater length ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Desperate stuff Home Secretary originally argued (very misleadingly) care workers shouldn't be allowed to settle because their wages were so low that they'd be a fiscal cost. Now she's arguing they shouldn't be allowed to settle because they'd get better paid jobs www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
Jonathan Portes reposted
"The people presented as a burden on Britain because they earn too little have become so indispensable that they must be prevented from finding a better or higher-paid job." @jdportes.bsky.social critiques the Home Office's changing approach to migrant care workers. ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Have now written about this at greater length ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Desperate stuff Home Secretary originally argued (very misleadingly) care workers shouldn't be allowed to settle because their wages were so low that they'd be a fiscal cost. Now she's arguing they shouldn't be allowed to settle because they'd get better paid jobs www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
Jonathan Portes reposted
Jonathan Portes reposted
Me on the Home Office's latest contorted and contradictory attempt to justify an intellectually and morally bankrupt set of proposals.. ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Jonathan Portes reposted
The fall in immigration is mutilating Healey’s Budget iandunt.substack.com/p/the-fall-i...
Jonathan Portes reposted
“There is a straightforward alternative. Fund care properly, improve pay and conditions, and make it a sector in which people want to build a career.”
Me on the Home Office's latest contorted and contradictory attempt to justify an intellectually and morally bankrupt set of proposals.. ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Me on the Home Office's latest contorted and contradictory attempt to justify an intellectually and morally bankrupt set of proposals.. ukandeu.ac.uk/unaffordable...
Jonathan Portes reposted
The immigration doom loop, summed up here by @gabyhinsliff.bsky.social www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...