Post

I'm not reading any garbage Axios article but Ro Khanna is the better option. He's more of a leader and does try to reach out to as many people as possible. AOC can't even endorse her former chief of staff over a pro-Israel stooge. AOC says the right things but has failed to prove she's a leader

The "tech bros" are funding his primary Challenger like I swear all of you are terrible at coming up with good criticisms. Next time criticize him for the shady stock trades under his family's name like its not hard to find legitimate criticisms on Ro without making stuff up

AOC is a leftist firebrand and Ro Khanna is a moderately toned progressive. Based on that alone it should not be a hard choice but Ro is meeting the moment in ways that AOC isn't. They both have baggage. We'll see how the next couple years go. We don't have to choose our fighter quite yet.

What kind of nonsense are you talking about? Who was in Georgia last week? Who was in Philadelphia and helped Chris Rabb get elected? Who was in Alabama? Ro doesn’t meet anything besides tweets. We had to even beg him to sign onto Tlaib’s Nakba resolution

AXIOS DESPERATELY WANTS YOU TO KNOW THAT NOW, RIGHT BEFORE THE MID-TERMS, IS THE PERFECT TIME FOR DEMS/PROGRESSIVES TO START IN-FIGHTING AND DIVIDE THEMSELVES WHILE FORMING CIRCULAR FIRING SQUADS. YOU ARE WHAT WE THINK YOU ARE, AXIOS. GO FUCK YOURSELVES AND YOUR OLIGARCH MASTERS. NOBODY IS FOOLED.

This is actually a way more clever "trial balloon" than any of the stuff that Gavin's folks have managed to slip into the press. It *frames* the two as equals, setting the stage to compare them, when there isn't actually any reason to consider Ro Khanna on-par with AOC in any way.