Post

Some people have thoughts about it, but I like this. I am different and I accept that about myself, and I have only improved personally and professionally by accepting who I am and how I am, even if that is different. Anyway, this interview was an honour and exciting for me as a British person.

I only recently discovered you, but after watching several interviews and reading some of your writing, I don’t really agree with the observations of the writer. Perhaps you’ve become more polished because I found you incredibly coherent and focused on the topics of AI and the current technocracy.

Generally a good piece, but it’s just so funny that it claims that you’re not acknowledging that other critics exist by pointing to Gary Marcus’ bruised ego. You constantly acknowledge that you’re not alone in your criticism, Marcus is just upset you’re not talking about him. Wtf.

It is strange that the piece makes it sound like this is only about personal animus or vibes rather than about technical limitations and financial overreach- like, nowhere in their piece are your arguments & extensive list of predicted limiting conditions on the AI bubble discussed

Really enjoying that one quote about that one journalist who refuses to be named. Also really enjoying the fact that, by putting them in the section about "AI skeptic" journalists mad at you without *confirming* said journalist themselves is an AI skeptic, it seems like obfuscation.