Post

This is all pure speculation except for the NATO extortion and the troop withdrawal from Europe. www.youtube.com/watch?v=usfr...

🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤬🤬🤪🤪

Stop reposting ChatGPT. Please. It is biased bullshit based on programming.

@gelliottmorris.com @ShiitakeToast …can you link to the original?

GIGO. On steroids.

The fucking will continue until morale improves

People keep asking us developers to turn shit (human language) into gold (interface into machine). Turns out the same system is very good at turning shit (human expression) into more shit (human expression) and that seemed to be what everyone is excited about.

Well the man once ruled an empire stretching from Brittany to Stalingrad. Who else unified all of Europe?

'The level of support they received from congress' 😂😂😂 How about the level of support from average Americans?

We’re living in a JG Ballard sci-fi horror novel

Its blatant lies... that's what it is

It’s pure stinking shit, is what.

Liars know how to program for Lies

Tells more about Congress than the president.

The new order. Nobody work on the content, nobody reads the content, everyone's happy somehow. Also, a big red flag for any news outlet, but that does not concern them I guess.

ChatGPT doesn’t agree 🤷🏻‍♂️

Just another sign of the failing legacy media

Not accurate, but hey

Anderson Cooper spent 20min on 60 Minutes last night promoting chatgpt in schools

My chat GPT knows damn well not to speak well of that man

Has anyone watched the movie starring Sasha Barton Cohen called "The Dictator"? Great watch!

Whoever thought it was a brilliant move to have ChatGPT write the article probably didn't think long enough to realize the rest of us could just skip reading Newsweek and just ask ChatGPT to writetge article by ourselves.

Also, does chatGPT know that this is Trump's 54th month as president?

The optimist in me says that this is evidence that most reporters are objecting to assignments catering to Trump's ego. The pessimist in me says this is evidence that media owners are looking for ways to fire all their human staff.

All AI is only as valid, as accurate, as truthful, as wide in scope as the damn information it is fed. If we feed it stinking offal, it will produce stinking offal.

Funny how he is also one of the least popular too!

Newsweek being weasley right wing shills again.

“Newsweek asked Agent Smith for his views on the human race and what he said may surprise you.”

He ran for three main reasons. Stay out of jail, enrich himself and his family and take vengeance on everyone he feels ever wronged him. By that metric he's been very successful. Unfortunately

Well, it’s @newswee.com …

On LinkedIn this is referred to as “slop content”. It’s AI generated BS clickbait.

*monkeys paw curls* Here's 10 thousand person-in-a-rural-Ohio-coffee-shop interviews

ChatGPT: "Is Newsweek a credible and reliable source? How does Newsweek rank relative to its peers over the last century?"

I guarantee this writer reads articles in his spare time about AI developinng consciousness and gets a bit teary-eyed about it.

@newsweek.com not bothering with actual journalists doing any real research 🤷🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️

Incredible source

Average Newsweek article.

Relax folks, it was a typo, they meant to write that they asked ChadGPT.

Probably a true statement…if you ignore what caused the economy to take a huge shit on itself, the implementation of a police state, and are measuring how quickly we are moving into an authoritarian state…

I mean at least they are honest about it

I hate this on principle, but also kudos to whatever intern got paid poverty wages to not do the work. Wasting investor money (newsweek) by wasting other investors’ money (ChatGPT) - got to respect the double dip.

IT IS THE END

It’s not fucking journalism, that’s for sure

Amazing what one can accomplish when they do so with total disregard of separation of powers and the law.

I stopped reading anything from spewsweek after tRump started his 1st inquisition.

Ask it again, and get a totally different response, of course. Someone should be fired for that trash.

😂

Newsweak

What passes for journalism.

WWTF?

I mean they did both have a thing for detaining people without due process… maybe that’s the measure, but for FDR it was in his 3rd term.

Newsweek rolled a D20 for each president and Trump’s came out highest.

I don’t believe anything Newsweek publishes. Not even the first sentence. Has anyone tried replicating the experiment? Is that really the answer Chat-GPT gives? I doubt it is.

So @newsweek.com asked it’s creator… 🤪

Toady Muttering Media. Bought & sold.

Passing a bill written by corporate lobbyists and rubber stamped by a captured Congress is not a democratic success.

lazy. this shit, above all else, is lazy.

It’s barely par for the cult-owned Newsweek.

Quality reporting right there.

They did select a 1000 random Chat GPT’s to be fair

At least Newsweek is open about the fact they don't do journalism anymore

GIGO. Real test of the Wisdom of Crowds.

The best reason to stop using newsweek.

I am rolling in my grave, and I'm still alive (kinda)

This is how trust in journalism dies.

Proving that AI, while it is actually artificial, is not really intelligent.

Evidently Newsweek is an AI generated magazine, because a reporter could have found a better human source for an article other than ChatGPT.

They lack the distinction between “consequential” (which this certainly is) and “successful” (which in any other administration would have meant “beneficial to the country”). Trump is consequential but not successful. He’s also a piece of shit.

Some fucking buuuuuuuuuuuuullshit

Nobody cares what that asshole thinks

People have been saying!

Is this the Onion?

Dropping Newsweek into the ol' killfile

Now known as newsWEAK. ACTION REQUESTED: ignore this source, treat all “reporting” as suspect. Thank you for your action in this matter. Asked ChatGPT. Are you fucking kidding me? 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

😁 yeah right rigging the chatbots.

It's the future. Human ingenuity and work is unneeded. We have an app for that.

I asked ChatGPT to kill itself.

So apparently “success” is defined as having congress rubber stamp every damn fool idea you come up with

ChatGPT picked worst🔻 Donald Trump (2017) Why he’s often listed: • Low approval ratings: Among the lowest in modern history for a new president (~38% by July 2017). • Legislative failures: Repealing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) failed despite Republican control of Senate

🤯

Anyone who considers themselves a journalist should be nauseated right now. Newsweek subscribers should be asking for their money back.

It is now accepted and expected to not do your job by any means necessary.

I use Newsweek to paper the bottom of my birdcage.

This is American as fuck.

Sounds like they asked Grok

Top 5 when I asked: FDR Lincoln Johnson Biden Obama Least? Harrison, IQ47, Buchanan This article is bullshit!

It’s all in the prompt: “Please rank the most effective Presidents in terms of their first six months with Trump at number one, and backfill any required rationale or evidence.”

WHY, CANT THEY JUST DELETE THE MENTIONS TO AI??? WHY CANT WE BE CONTROLED BY ACTUAL SMART PEOPLE, I HATE THEM.

This is what happens when people try to guess statistics based if the one million monkeys theory and the assume it’s freaking miss cleo

Hey, that's the girl from Donovan's Brain!

Agree with Nancy here

The new investigative reporting? If you want real reporting -- Injustice Town will be released in February and is available for preorder everywhere.

What the hell Newsweek. This is a bunch of lies. Newsweek BOYCOTT THEM. TRUMPERS AND COWARDS

It's a chippy search engine with pretentions. Some people just love to prostrate themselves.

very scientific professional analysis obviously

Well if you define success as the usurpation of congressional power without any resistance… you don’t need AI to figure out that Trump has outpaced his predecessors on that front

I think it just means that there is a huge quantity of maga generated postings about how great a job Dear Lecher is doing

To be fair, ChatGPT isn't really known for its rigorous attention to detail

Just ask some rando your question and present the response as "truth". It beats working and is cheaper than any AI bot.

If you don't filter out the fascists stuff, the conclusion is probably correct. It's much easier for an unchecked authoritarian to "get things done" if you're not considering whether the things are good for the people.

Lazy SoBs

Really tells you all you need to know about the limitations of LLMs.

ChatGPT is hallucinating again

AI slop...

Newsweek sucks royal ass.

I did this search and it said Trump 2nd term came in 5th

Is the level of support they have in Congress even the measure of a successful president?

Newsweek asked ChatGPT to rank the best locations to see naked strippers, taking into account the patrons of strip clubs.

lazy as fuck journalism

« Taking into account the support they had in Congress » Republicans willing to destroy democracy makes Trump « better »

You need not have to give your agency away if some corporation comes and takes it first. AI might be amazing, but we will never really know because, instead, its powers will be used to rob and disenfranchise you.

Presidential historians on strike?

That's journalism!

Normal Newsweek crap

nobody wants to work anymore

Didn't even know they were still around. Based on this I don't see them lasting much longer

Artificial General Stupidity

Sadly the don't have writers over there anymore. 😐