Post

Huge suv and trucks are pretty common in Brazil. But we still have a lot of small cars so the traffic is made of all sizes of cars. Those huge cars are more expensive, so it is a sign of status. At least monster trucks are rarer (but they exist too).

Yes, they increased a lot on the last 15 years or so… and maybe they are less popular on the northeast states. They are common on the states where there is a huge culture around farm/country (“agro”) such as Paraná, Mato Grosso, Goiás, São Paulo.

In Australia the most popular passenger car is the Ford Ranger, but this is a mid size truck in the US. I have seen people in the US complain that they can't get "smaller trucks" like the Ford Ranger. That car is huge.

Yep and 10 years ago the most popular car in Australia was the humble Toyota Corolla. It’s a sign of what bad tax and regulatory settings gets you. The previous conservative government incentivised these huge trucks. I also see plenty of Rams, Chevrolet Silverados and Ford F-150s in my suburb.

And this is how the American auto industry persuaded the nation that roads should be for cars, not people, paving the way ;) for the concrete nightmare that is the modern highway system and absence of efficient public transportation: Blame the "careless" pedestrians, not the cars.

What all of those people don't realize is that the more top-heavy a vehicle is, the more prone it is to rollovers. Do a search about fatality rates during rollovers, and it's not good. So this myth of bigger being safer is a complete lie.

The way smaller vehicles fare in collisions with big SUVs is a reason to buy a big SUV, but only if you’re a psychopath who doesn’t care about anybody outside of your own vehicle.

There does also seem to be a difference in how others treat you on the road in general. Once on business Enterprise only had a pickup to give me...was a strange driving experience, when I signaled people MADE ROOM and nobody tried to change lanes into me like they do in my personal car.

They really should factor in your likelihood of killing other people in a collision when determining insurance rates but our sociopathic society brands any policy for mitigating negative externalities as big bad scary Socialism.

Which is weird, because in the US the at-fault party usually pays for everything. Therefore, when everyone is required to have car insurance, your car insurance is there to cover what you do to the other person and their property just as much as what you do to your own.

Yeah exactly. And who GENUINELY wants that? What driver is sitting there saying "Man, I sure wish I couldn't even reach my engine bay without a ladder! Normal maintenance and daily checks should be MORE difficult!"

Back in the day, stronger engines were taller. High hoodlines almost made sense. Today, 500 hp comes in a shoebox. Truck hoods could slope down 45 degrees & help mileage and visibility. But it wouldn't look butch. Everything on today's pickup truck is there to look butch. Nothing else matters.

You...might want to pick a better graph. If you actually read the numbers on it, that graph is showing we're getting steadily safer. Which, we are, but it's because of safety technology, not these stupidly giant trucks.

Honestly that's why I'm so pissed about the Ranger redesign. As someone who's experienced a 1998 Mazda B2500 for his whole life? I can NEVER get a new truck that size. If it fully breaks I'm fucked. I don't need an F150 4 times the size of my current truck. I just need a small pickup for work.

I know that top right picture is trying to make it look especially big...but as a not-quite-6ft adult I have actually seen a pickup at a BestBuy which I had to look UP to see the branding on it as the top of the grill was in line with my forehead when standing upright

I don't think it's trying that hard. It's clearly a kid in the picture, and the adult is taking it straight on from the bottom of the driveway. It's not like it's at some extreme angle or using a fisheye lens to enhance the size of the truck. It's just a normal pic of a normal kid next to a truck

you joke about the whirling spike clubs but when I was a teenager I was in a contest to make a lego robot that would roam a pool table with another team's robot and try to knock down the most cardboard tubes, and the giant whirling tire flail was an excellent strategy for smashing the other robot

I choose not to participate in the meta and have instead gone with a stealth build. It takes longer to travel cross country when you’re dashing between shadows without a vehicle, but there’s a certain satisfaction that makes the utter destruction of your knees from crouch walking worth it.

T&E@transportenvironment.org

Leading medical publication the British Medical Journal recognises SUVs as a danger to public health in a new editorial co-authored by T&E’s James Nix: bit.ly/4hVDlBC Large SUVs are a danger to pedestrians, cyclists & other drivers. It's time to take action to reduce their presence in urban areas.

My question is: can any of you motherfuckers open your door? I drive a 20 year old Mini Cooper and if I park between two average sized vehicles, I can't open my door. What do normal people do? Climb in and out through the back? No, I'm serious. Your SUV seems impossible, impractical for anything.

It's impossible to buy a small car in the US because of the unintended consequences of emissions, fuel economy and trade regulations. They say safety has something to do with safety but it's not true. It's because we painted ourselves in a corner. A functioning government would just fix this.

"soon"?????? You mean now? These things already exist and some people use them...and I've met plenty who intentionally keep HUGE hitches sticking way out "to punish anyone who tailgates and save their bumper"

I miss my hatchback, but the trunk in my wagon is worth it. Still smaller than most cars on the road. I'm not really worried about it, seeing as I also cycle on the road, so my car is huge by comparison!

The metal armor rules in the Gas Powered Expansion destroyed the game IMHO Still I played it a lot in College in the late 80s recently I played the Game Gasland from Osprey Games which is a better take on the idea

Standardize hood height so you can always see someone in front of you, class oversized vehicles as trucks and require additional permits to own or operate them, and force companies to compensate people for replacing the car that they now can not legally own or operate without training.

Also, "50 years ago", aka the mid-1970s, was a reversal in car size trends. In the 50s and 60s there was a common belief - and selling point from manufacturers - that to be safe in a crash, you wanted to have a lot of heavy steel so the car doesn't crumple. Which was, of course, actually backwards.

It was the 1970s where the trends started to reverse as people started to understand the importance of crumple zones, and fuel prices started to bite. (To be fair, you absolutely don't want the *passenger safety cell* to crumple. But you want everything outside it to crumple).

i think consumers have the bear responsibility for what they are buying too, and manufacturers realised that for the same cost of making a small car, they can make a crossover and make more on margins because consumers are willing to pay for it

Damage to roads increases exponentially with axle load and that should reflect in on-road costs. People with huge cars complaining about poor quality roads need to pay properly for the damage they are doing.

4th power is the exponent, yes! Arguable as to exact accuracy of the number but the point that doubling axle load more than doubles road wear is definitely the case. High speed and high mass is what destroys roads.