Post

NASA isn't why the US doesn't have universal healthcare, or a social safety net. The US doesn't have those things because politicians with the power to provide them choose specifically not to (with varying levels of support from voters). Enthusiasm for human spaceflight doesn't drive that choice.

It's frequently pointed out that NASA activities (and basic/exploratory science in general) have a fantastic return on investment, contributing far more to the economy than they take. But even if they didn't, no one's actually taking from the "cure sick people" pot to put money in the "rockets" pot.

The problems with US government spending priorities are vast and extremely depressing/enraging much of the time. I desperately wish much more was spent on improving people's lives directly, and much less on war. Science spending just isn't really part of that particular equation.

169 reposts2K likes

The mediocre destroy what they can't understand and the orange demagogue and his minions are 𝘢𝘭𝘭 mediocre, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮! 😒 It's a prerequisite to admission! 💁 “Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly recognizes genius.” - Sherlock Holmes via Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Vast spending on war when tangible human problems could be completely solved with those sums just gives a feel of enraged despair. This world could be so much better for so so many people if we didn’t financially incentivize destruction and mass killing.

What is weird to me is the national labs were basically created because science was considered key to national defense. Other government funding went to research about things like crops, which were also seen as a national interest. Somewhere along the way the grift pushed out the science…

Worth noting that the incredibly conservative Heritage Foundation did a study to try and prove Medicare for All was too expensive and even they found it would save us trillions instead. Money isn't the barrier to better things in our nation. Certainly not the tiny bit of money we give NASA.

"Americans are a people who will spend 5 dollars to ensue 1 dollar doesn't go to someone who doesn't 'deserve it'" is one of my favorite all time quotes and I wish I remembered the poster who sai dit.

Money is never the barrier in the U.S. It’s insecurity. I.e., some Americans are so insecure they want to keep quality services from the poor, whom they feel are “less deserving” of nice things, mostly so they can feel superior about themselves. They are afraid of what equality might look like.

In the 90's I used to give public outreach talks about JPL missions. I always asked the audience what fraction of the federal budget such breathtaking achievement required. They never came anywhere close. At the time it was around .06%.

I remember reading something a few years back where people were polled on what they thought the NASA budget was, and the guesses were usually off by an order of magnitude. There are people convinced NASA's budget is larger than the defense budget!

Yep. Not to detract from Katie's point, however, that the reason the US ranks poorly in many measures of quality of life is that powerful people want it that way, not that we can't afford it.

Anyway I spend a lot of time here talking about the immense harms being done by the US government & about why we should have healthcare & basic income & public transit & education. I wish those were things the govt wanted to do. Also, I'm glad when they support some amazing things in science & space

Would be a game changer, paying for each other’s healthcare. No longer bankrupting or exploiting the sick, holding them to ransom for their medication. Y’all might stop hating and scamming each other so much.

Sending humans to the moon has very little science return for each $ and feels like a campaign stunt for the midterms. Important science disciplines like climate science and vaccines is cut to unsustainable levels. No need to cheer, I saw this already in 1969.

Let's not do cool shit now and again that engages the public positively in space exploration for the first time in what feels like decades, because you personally think only in dollar signs and deluded visions of campaign strategy (despite this mission planning preliminaries starting in 2017)

Exploratory science isn’t actually competing with helping people in need. It only feels that way when politicians turn everything into a zero-sum game. We can (and should) have both: a strong social safety net and ambitious investments in science and space exploration. 🔭 🧪 ⚛️ 1/2

The countries that manage this best aren’t the ones cutting science budgets — they’re the ones who handle taxes, bureaucracy, and long-term priorities more effectively. The US has the resources for both. What’s really missing is consistent political will. 🔭 🧪 ⚛️ 2/2