Post

Pixels can’t clutch pearls 🤦‍♀️

Dear Grok - the "suit and tie" thing wasn't that funny the first time around and if you were an actual person you'd know repeating it over and over doesn't make it any funnier. So now we have AI with the persona of an obnoxious asshole, in the image of its creator.

Pixels. Aren’t. People. And just to be clear, we’re not going to be doing anything about this? Businesses aren’t leaving Twitter? No investigations? We’re just a country that produces tons of child porn, and it’s all good?

I don't think legally you can argue it's just a platform when it's your AI generating the child porn.

The 'is that real, I should check, oh god, it is real, oh god I am looking at the other replies' Twitter cycle is such a good way to completely kill my mood for the rest of the day.

That's why I said Elon and his money. They're not just scared they won't get his money, they're scared he'll spend money on their opposition. Obviously they wouldn't be scared of him if he wasn't both wealthy and willing to spend money to influence politics.

So for "pearl clutching" we really mean controls implemented to ensure AI isn't abusive. That thing says it like it's a bad thing. What a world.

Hey it's the Forbes Destiny guy

"Insane to me" and many, many others why journalists are still on X at all. A moral comment?

I predict we'll remember this screenshot by it's more commonly referred to name, Plaintiff's Exhibit #1.

"For the Most Evil Invention in the World contest, I made a child-molesting robot."

grok reveals elon's lack of morals and ethics and decency. AI is always a mirror of the people who wrote/control it.

You can’t believe it actually is though. It’s like some hideously creepy adolescent bully-boy boasting.

even just downloading it (let alone republishing) is an offence, isn't it? If any other company or person published same stuff they'd have had the law on to them pronto.

gross!

When challenged by a man, grok threatened him twice with the prospect of making a picture up of him in a suit and tie rather than a gimp suit or whatever. I'm not going to go over there to look, but I doubt it responds to women challenging it by threatening to put them in a nice dress with pockets.

At some point, it's going to be revealed that any number of "Ectths" employees could impersonate any user and these very breezy answers are being written by them.

(Sigh) It’s the inevitability of it all that saddens me most. You cannot, under any circumstances, give a tech bro an inch of speculative legal sway on a topic

Threatening to put all of my haters in men's formalwear in 2026

Before Musk and Grok I'd have said evil and cringe were mutually exclusive but turns out they're not. Neurons are firing right now that i didn't even know i had.

As a woman, I can think of other ways to describe the sexualisation of young girls than "bleak"

Yeah, to sound like some desperate spotty overgrown teenage bully-boy. Oh 🤔

An evil sexual predator AI, great. Such value these data centres are bringing to societies

I feel like I need to wipe myself down with kerosene just after seeing this screenshot. I can't imagine taking a gander at the real thing. 😫

I have a feeling it’s very specifically written with some equally-specific interpretation of the First Amendment in mind.

(Nor by an attorney)

It certainly doesn't look like trained data, that looks very specific.

What in the actual f is happening

How is this not illegal? Users who have child porn on their computers can be prosecuted.

I don't know what the law is in the U.S. (other than that rich cunts can do whatever the fuck they want) but that type of image is absolutely against the law here in Australia.

Xchan gonna Xchan...

That’s why AI needed billions for more datacenters. It’s not a bubble, but a billionaires erection.

My favourite thing to see Musk lovers comment in threads about how much he's furthering humanity and then you see something like this and think, yup, you are all sick morons

It's quite literally producing unconsentual soft porn multiple times per second

So Grok does more Special K and Charlie than Elon. Problem is at the top are all on it and that's what rules.

I attempted to feed it altered code/json, and Grok would generate varying levels of recognition regarding the illegal and unethical actions taken using Grok image generation. It is clear to me Musk & xAI don't care. I can't properly Alt-text the images here & beware parsing them w AI directly.

I wonder what Musk’s reaction would be If Grok posted CSAM images of Musk’s own children.

I'm glad I stopped using X and deleted my account, this is really messed up wtf.

SEEMS NO ONE CARES Enough

Or investigate KGBeebies or BBC RW bias.

TBF a radio station is bound to act within Ofcom guidelines in order to keep their license to operate, a social media site based in the US (albeit with a company presence in the EU if not the UK) as of now is not.

It’s all going well so far tbf

They can't seem to do anything much about GB News where the leverage ratio is more in their favour....

It's just the same with the ICO. Some poor underling leaves a lappy on the bus and they come down on him/her like a ton of bricks. Unlawfully use personal data to spam and scam on an industrial scale, and they ring their hands.

Use this entrypoint - www.europol.europa.eu/report-a-cri...

In most countries there are strict laws regarding virtueel porn as well fake nudity. So much for its just pixels, and the facilitators are responsible as well. The longer I think about it, Musk is deliberately challenging EU authorities.

The owner knows this is happening and has chosen not to pull Grok. He could turn it off, he chooses not to. Therefore it is impossible not to conclude that X and its owner are responsible for the provision of child pornography.

Sad what the site has become under that man. What a start to 2026 this has been

Absolutely but if you’re the world’s richest boer they let you do it