Post

We’re aware of the bot followers. We know it’s really irritating for yall. The blade runners are working hard and we’re looking at bigger steps.

2.3K reposts24.4K likes

I knew WaPo would take this turn once they lost Marty Barron as their editorial leader, who was also the editorial leader at The Boston Globe back in the days when the pedophile priest story broke here. He was not afraid to buck the brass and Cardinal Cushing to reveal the truth.

Give us a way to approve followers, or a way to block them en masse from the list of new followers. I wouldn’t mind so much if it didn’t take 6 clicks to block each bot.

Paul are you suggesting these large breasted women may not actually represent the sender. Next, you'll expect me to believe they're not really interested in a relationship with an old man like me. I'm "shocked, shocked" I tell you. LOL.

"Heartbreaking" is what it is. Thank goodness for the poor people following me that live without electricity or running water in Africa and Gaza, they reaffirm my faith in humanity. It's a bit odd though that they somehow have internet service and Wi-Fi.

Haha and here I thought they were all wanting me a 66 year old grey-haired Englishwomen. I think they’re a bit confused tbh, I’m not gay, I’m old, I’ve already blocked about 300 of them and now I’m reporting every single one as spam seeing as my profile clearly states NO PORN

Hello, Greetings from the great Illuminati brotherhood...this message is to invite you to be part of us and be a partaker of the *FAME*POWER*WEALTH*PROTECTION* and as well 💲50,000,000,00 USD as a welcoming gift👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 WhatsApp +1(909)496-7296)

Yeah, it's getting frustrating. It seems I'm blocking more followers than I'm following lately, and it seems they're mostly young women with explicit content. We trust you guys will come up with something.

I kinda expect my followers to drop nearly in half if they all go. The porn bots seem attracted to moi. Not a gift I care for. Good luck! Looking forward to the lower count for the higher quality experience!

that is precisely what I assume. - “god-fearing” women or “ready for a serious relationship” with nothing but selfies - generic (often Asian) women with nothing but “live laugh love” type platitudes - “life coaches” - crypto - people w/nothing but political posts but supporting BOTH sides

Word. I myself work in fraud/cyber security and bots are one bane of all existence. The conceptual to sometime realized beauty - and then inevitable pitfalls of technology. Gotta love/hate it.

To be fair, it's only really possible to hit bots after the fact without treading the line of blocking/banning legit accounts. But I do agree that there should be some basic steps, like accounts with female avatars, no bio except a link, zero posts, and are following thousands of people.

Thank you. The relatively few bot followers are mildly irritating for sure but easily dealt with. A pretty good trade-off when I get to enjoy so many good postings. I remain grateful for those folks who try to inform and generally lift our spirits.

Can't tell you how many possible bots I have muted. No, really, I can't -- because the mechanism, which may or may not exist, to discern this info -- is opaque. I can't figure out how to learn much of anything about followers.

I've been getting a lot of notifications on my phone that someone will follow me. It will usually be twice, but the name has a different emoji each time. When I go into my followers list or into my alerts in the app, those people won't be there. Is that concerning at all?

Are any of them even real? I suspect many of these accounts are really some creepy guy sitting in a warehouse in Mumbai wanting you to chat on Telegram/WhatsApp so they can sell you titillating 📸 's of young girls. The block lists show 000's with same profile 📸 and bio?

it's like junk mail. a 1% follow-back ratio is "success". early users with very few followers like to be followed and "return the favor" without vetting AT ALL

So predictable, it was the same on that other site, when it went rogue. First they tried with single men. Then men with puppies. Then, inexplicably, semi-dressed women. This latest tranche is men with children. Not sure what to expect next.

Give us an option to submit URLs of dating and porn links so that anybody who puts a matching URL domain automatically gets blocked by those accounts who opted into that filtering system. That way, the censorship is on "US" using our choice and relieves bsky of censorship liability. #LetUsHelpYou

Thankfully they're so transparently obvious its an easy block. They're just a reminder of how shitty the Internet is in general these days. Yes, I realise I'm showing my age with this remark.

Thank you, Paul! You and team Bluesky are amazing and we truly appreciate all you are doing to keep this platform a productive place of engaging discussion. I am making so many connections here with really prosocial intelligent people who truly want to problem solve.

Also, no money in landlines anymore. I had major cable problems where I live, no Fios, no spare pairs so they decide to give me a wireless line, no more cable pair but they raised the price and I get less features. One reason why they are in trouble. No more fixing the outside network.