Post

I admit it, I had a crush on Boy George when I was, what, 13? I was chock full of hormones and he was really *pretty.* Between Boy George and Annie Lennox I was deeply confused and willing to go with it.

desertjason.bsky.social@desertjason.bsky.social

As a fellow Gen Xer it also makes me fume when other Gen Xers complain about "the LGBT agenda". Like, my dude, we grew up with Culture Club in heavy rotation on MTV.

105 reposts2.4K likes

Well, I can't say as I ever had a crush on him. I do acknowledge that he was quite pretty in the conventional sense. Sophie Turner apparently got quite insulted when she was told she looked like him. Clearly she never watched his early works. Just watch Karma Chameleon and you'll never unsee it.

There was a lot of this, and then the 'If you're gay you must die' which kind of warped the national messaging stuff for a while, and I think that a surprising number of people (mostly men) in gen X simply never bounced back from that.

I would have loved to embrace my inner Boy George had I known it was possible. Maybe it wasn’t possible. I still wish I could have tried. I would have been pretty. But I was too busy watching Sting in David Lynch’s “Dune” (repeatedly) and wondering what my hormones were telling me. 🥵

I wasn’t confused because I read The Diary of Anne Frank and she talked about wanting to kiss her same sex friend at a sleepover and yeah I felt the same thing so it was totally normal.

(I like this place because literally none of these three are actually wearing shoulder pads but nobody is pointing that out because we can’t get over how much Jane Fonda looks like someone would try to kick her out of a ladies room in Florida these days…..JANE FONDA.)

I'm not *quite* as far along the Kinsey scale as that. But, my wife and I have discussed that if a young David Bowie stepped out of a time machine into our living room, neither of us can be sure what would happen.

Yeah. It applies to a lot of 70s sex symbols. Honestly, more recent than that, and the process got cheapened by a return to pretty boy/girl movie stars. The last 10 years in particular have felt like a return to pre-WWII studio systems, and not in a good way.

Oddly enough, understanding the differences between sex and gender really helped me sort this out. I'm attracted to traits that are loosely gendered, not strictly tied to sex. Being attracted to the person in this image to me has nothing really to do with a sex preference. It's just an aesthetic.

As teen I was definitely confused by Annie Lennox and Pete Burns and what gender actually meant as well as what sexuality actually meant. And luckily I knew most the queer kids in school so I could discuss with others which most couldn’t in the 80s.

A couple of guys in my high school were in love with the ladies of the band Poison. Much confusion when it was revealed they were all dudes. I couldn't believe anyone could like Poison regardless..

In the 80s, I wasn't a fan of Boy George but then a neighbor girl asked if I wanted to come watch a Boy George concert on HBO that was going to be simulcast on WIGY while her parents were out of town and we could fool around. I lost my virginity that night. I'm a *BIG* fan of Boy George.

Good news! His family live near where I grew up. My mum knew them from her work, and said that every single one of them was lovely. (Past tense only because my mum retired years ago. I'm sure they're still lovely.)

I am still blown away by what Dolf Lungren had to say about his history with her, and how she completely changed his life track- entirely new information to me within about a year.

Don't forget Rene Richards as well. I remember when that was all over the news and thinking interesting and then moving on. I long for the day when people's personal lives are just that and we can focus on character. Of course that would eliminate most Republicans from being acceptable.

I remember a friend (he/him) telling me: I'm as straight as one can be, but leave me in a room with Sean Connery... And then you remember that gender is a spectrum and no one is never 100% anything.