Post

People wildly overestimate the economic security experienced by past generations. There's no period in American history where significant numbers of young people were just handed high paying jobs. Nostalgia for a time that never existed is a huge problem.

Sohrab Ahmari@sohrabahmari.bsky.social

Why Nikki Haley’s son went radical: His generation inherited insecurity. I profile Nalin Haley, a fascinating young man, who I believe will likely play an important role in conservative politics in years to come. unherd.com/2025/11/why-...

285 reposts2K likes

Aside from all the apologia for terrible people the article entails, there are absolutely reasons for young people to feel romantic or nostalgic for the economic security that people used to experience. People today do not have the same opportunities that were afforded to baby boomers.

The wealth gap is starling. Look no further than home ownership. In 1996, when Boomers were 32-50, they owned 41% of real estate. Gen-X in 2021, then aged 41-56, owned 31%. In 2021, Baby Boomers owned 44.1%. Despite there being fewer baby boomers, and more homes, they took up a larger share.

self.incHow big is the generational wealth gap in America? | SelfHow wealthy is the average American baby boomer and how does their wealth compare to other generations? See the full report on the generational wealth gap here.

The average 30 year old millennial has $63,000 of wealth. The average boomer in their 30s had $58,000… in 1989 dollars. That’s $130,000 today. Boomers have captured so much of the wealth that people today have less than half of what the average baby boomer had at the same age.

For reference, Gen X had $80,000, which means that the wealth gap as Boomers got older has grown WORSE, not better. If you want to compare it to older generations, in their 50s, the Silent Generation averaged $495,000 of inflation-adjusted wealth. Baby Boomers had $704,000. Gen-X had $396,000.

The false past is going to drive us to such madness & ruin. Goaded on by fear, we will create such friction & enmity. Always distracting from the class conflict, being preyed upon by megacorps and megarich busy writing the rules. So fallen. These nightmares these foes speak write our dooms.

That’s true at the entry level. But my grandfather was able to support a wife who didn’t work, put 3 kids through college, and buy a house that’s now a $5,000/week vacation rental on a schoolteacher salary+navy pension. Long term jobs used to set people up in ways they rarely do now.

There is a working & middle class ideal of generational wealth and accomplishment - a notion that parents may hand off a baton that their children may start building their lives from their parent’s standard of living and take it to the next level. /1

But more often, even if parents can gift their children a college education or a first-home down payment, the next generation must take entry level work and contend with a much higher cost of living than their parents faced. Each generation faced recessionary cycles. /2

Middle and upper class parents who managed to survive/thrive often had to struggle to get where they presently are after 20-30 years- their adult kids too young to remember the hard years. So each generation feels they have been given a raw deal. I’m speaking just of families with economic security.

Just one catastrophic illness or injury can become an economic landslide for an individual or family. Social and economic mobility can go in different directions, quite suddenly. That is why it is important to preserve an economic safety net and regulate capitalism to protect against predation.

The thing is, though, it really was easier for GenXers to get started than it is for the current 20-somethings. At least in my area, starting wages for a typical entry-level job have doubled in 30 years, but rents have tripled and health insurance has gone up something like 8x.

Agreed, but we have to acknowledge that things are much harder now than when I was younger. My ex supported our family on one job, and we bought a house. He made barely above minimum wage. We also had access to healthcare without having huge insurance premiums.

yes but we no longer have a federal government that believes in employing people or paying for things like scientific research. lots of traditionally stable career paths for people with college education have been slammed shut

African-American Studies was my college minor, and I did research on Black employment in the 1950s. The percentage of Blacks in white collar jobs was 2%. The most common job for men was janitor, and the most common for women was maid. Black unemployment was 35% in the best of times. Jus' sayin'.

“Middle class prosperity” for my grandparents meant they owned their own house and their kids went to a good school. They did not have high paying jobs (teacher, factory foreman, secretary, insurance agent/ truck driver)

"high wage"+"middle class"? That's a poor wording choice or an intentional oversimplification. Also, if we're getting all dreamy about the manufacturing hey days of the 1950s-70s...understand that all industries had massive layoffs, union building/busting struggles & globalization dawned in the 70s

Honestly I think tech is a big part of it. We spend a lot on it. Yes our parents or grandparents owned a house but they didn't spend so much on all the whistles and bells. People didn't eat out much either. We fritter away alot of money.

I mean.. his blame falls on immigration and his solutions are incoherent.. but that we have large cohorts in the past 20 years who entered crappy job markets (often with massive debt compared to past generations) along with an insane housing market is definitely different than what boomers faced

In the 70's my parents had two cars and their own 4 bedroom house with a very reasonable mortgage, they put 3 of their kids through college, all on a middle class income and my mom mostly staying home except for some temporary jobs as we got older. Its crazy to think this economy is similar.

People are looking back on economic policies that they liked and wondering why they don't "deserve" similar benefits. Perhaps *your* perception of people's beliefs is simply misinformed. Economic inequality getting worse is not a phantasm.

Eh…my parents had me in high school and 2 years later they bought a 4br house near O’Hare off of one factory job. Not sure what world that is not economic security.

I would argue that economic security is one of the reasons for the rise of the far-right. The economy was a critical issue in the decades after the WWII but now that voters feel economically secure, they feel more liberated to vote for their choices without fear of the economic consequences.

People also forget that the rate of injury in manufacturing jobs was considerably higher! And support in the case of injury was much less, and no social security disability in 1950

Very true. My first job out of college in the 70’s was with a bank - I was below the poverty level for the first few years of my career. I worked my way up until I was at 6 figures but it took many years.

Yes this frustrates me too. We were able to get jobs out of college, but we worked our way up, as most people do. Rarely could someone jump right into a job that could afford them a house. Most rented and tried to save our bought a cheap house in a shitty part of town.

It's more that young people with entry level salaries could afford a big city studio apartment or a 2-bedroom share and had minimal co-pays for job-aligned health insurance.

Bachelor’s degrees in computing from mediocre universities no longer guaranteeing top-decile salaries straight out of school is treated as a broken promise, and not a correction of an obvious economic anomaly.

We tend to forget that the boom of the 50s was due to the fact that America was the only major industrialized nation that wasn’t destroyed by WW2. We had massively ramped up manufacturing and were the supplier to the world while they rebuilt.

This is true. The economy has been in a constant roil throughout the decades and during every generation. Some folks have had it a little worse depending on the year they landed in the workforce. But the ups and severe downs were always there. No generation is inoculated from economic harms.

I graduated UNC in ‘77. Smack between two opec oil embargoes, two hard recessions, inflation near 9% for years and prime interest rate hitting 18%. Ahhh the good ol’ days

And things were not always great for white men who were not wealthy. Think of all the white men who toiled 80+ hours/week in factories or farms untill labor laws were enacted. The 1950s were good because of union representation.

Nepo boy w/fam worth multi millions as voice of working/middle class Gen Z.I’m abt 10 yrs out of uni/job transition but did it simultaneously US/Finland.Salaries close;expectations/fixed cost varied wildly.Housing cheaper.No student loans.Free healthcare.Safety net.Prog tax.Not immigrants,Eco policy

It's normal for twentysomethings to live in undesirable housing, often with roommates. It's normal for people just getting started to have to budget severely. The idea that everyone should be able to live in a dream apt, alone, eating out all the time, and going on fancy vacations is not realistic.

At some point it stopped being normal that students make their own wine, and instead started to show up in class w. take away bagel and coffee. And yes, I'm old and grumpy, back in the days I lived in shared flat with drug addicts and my kid has a studio with heat pump in cool district at seventeen

I think the idea that someone working full time shouldn’t have to live with a friend or stranger to afford a place near where they work is pretty reasonable

It's one thing to be concerned about people unable to afford safe housing, or sufficient food. It's another to think you're being failed by society because you can't buy a house at 25 and live an influencer lifestyle.

I had seven roommates when I was 23 (I am 58 now). I have had an amazing career, and yet I have been laid off 7 times. I have never left a job voluntarily. Nothing they are experiencing is new

I have a solid solid background in economics. High wages would mean a wage above middle class. So the 4th and 5th quintile. People aren’t asking for that they are asking for 3rd quintile wage with the buying power that they had in the 50s and 60s.

A car is 30 to 40k. My 1971 dodge charger was 3500 bucks in 1971. That was about 1/3 of the median wage and that was a muscle car. A car today is closer to half the median wage of today. That is just one major example. I am do housing next if you want

Ok fuck it let’s do housing. Median monthly 30 year mortgage in 1971 was 150 bucks compared to 2200 in 2024. So in 71 the median mortgage was 17% of median income. To the 33% it is today

I wasn't trying to do an affordability comparison to today so much as pointing out that economic security in past eras was much worse than some people are imagining. Just to take one example, if you were a woman or if you were something other than white, things really sucked in the 1950s/1960s.

Simon, yes, there was a time when young people were handed high paying jobs. Those legacies coming from Ivy League schools for one. And in the past decade good jobs are secured thru nepotism and cronyism. It is not and has never been an even playing field. Who you know counts more than anything

In 1961, my Mom, who was married to my Dad at the time, was fired for being pregnant. She was unable to have her own credit card at the time because she had a vagina & was unable to use birth control without permission from her husband. But sure, things are much tougher now.

It may not be as impactful as the other factors mentioned in this thread, but your mom-and-pop employer or landlord cutting you some kind of sweetheart deal—though not guaranteed then, and not unheard of today—was far more likely 40 years ago than it is now.

Okay, but can we just accept this guy is a jerk? For many reasons, not all his fault. But still, a jerk. Does not detract from the reality life is eat what you kill; metaphorically for most.

Housing was cheaper adjusted for inflation, but I honestly think tech is a big part ot it. People had a phone line before and that was it. We pay and pay for tech. It never ends, everything is always being updated

I came of age when Reagan was elected. I remember going to apply for a sales clerk job at Sears and 200 other people had shown up. For 1 job. That was the Reagan economy. The good ole days... I've no idea what they are nostalgic for.

you also shouldn’t underestimate it: the median home price ($47k) was only a little more than 2x the median income ($20k) in 1980. Now it’s 10x (or 5x for a couple, but in 1980 one income was enough)

my point is it’s undeniable that millennials and later face a much harder economic reality than their parents did. they didn’t just hand out high wage jobs but you didn’t need one to survive. my parents bought a house at 28 on one income, no college. i wasn’t able until 40 w/ 2 (and grad degrees)

it's not that people had high paying jobs (this article is stupid) it's that we had a high top marginal tax rate keeping things relatively even for a while, which allowed for a reasonable housing market. Reagan took away all the guardrails keeping business owners in check

There was a time, though, when they were handed jobs (even if low-paying and demanding) that they could then use to prove themselves and move up the ladder rather than sending 1000s of resumes screaming into the void of "apply online."

I haven’t read any of the underlined or post, but the OP here seems like a real strawman argument. Normalizing for the usual swings in the economy, the issue is that in the past, there were prospects for each succeeding generation that were better than those for the prior generation.

Before he switched to scifi, Philip K.Dick's social realist novels set in California in the 40s/50s depicted a world of insecurity, paranoia, and unhappy childhoods in the Depression. There was a straight line from that stuff to "reality is unstable" mind games.

My grandparents were depression era teens/20 somethings. Hard times. They lived with their parents after they got married for years.

In the UK, the reason old trad Northern comics did jokes about mothers-in-law is because in the decades after WW2 lots of young couples had to live with parents due to lack of housing due to bomb damage.