Post

The Quran was used by 14 MPs in 2024, and by Sagal Abdi-Wali this week, while 338 MPs swore on a bible, 3 including Rishi Sunak on the Bhagavad Gita, the Hindu holy book, while at least 249 MPs chose to affirm, without using a religious text, according to research in 2024 by the Humanists

Professor Goodwin seems to be feigning surprise that an MP who is a Muslim would swear the oath of allegiance on the Quran, NOT the Bible. Hannah Spencer took her oath on the bible [4 Greens affirmed in 2024] after defeating Goodwin in Gorton + Denton. [His own hypothetical choice is unknown]

Edward Oakenfull, a Restore member and local election candidate, who was suspended by Farage during BBC Question Time as a Reform general election candidate - after his prejudiced quotes were read out on TV, questions the loyalty of an MP who swears an oath on the book of their faith

He's just putting out a clarion call (not a dog whistle because we can all hear it loud and clear) to the racist Reform faithful. It's so pathetic and predictable.

Mr Goodwin is a ex Professor. Like the parrot in Monty Python, Mr Goodwin’s Professorship is dead, no more, kaput. He is no more a Professor than I am the Angel Gabriel (& I can assure you I am not👍😄). A title of “Professor” can give a societal status of learning&knowledge - false in this instance🥹👇

Is there an approved list or can you claim any book as your holy book? What if I wanted to highlight the ridiculousness by swearing on the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy? (Not an MP, sadly, so can't)

No problem with the Dhammapadha text itself. And in not invoking God in her oath to the country. Makes sense to me. What I dont get is how a practising buddhist would behave the way she does and say the things she does.

No, their behaviour also makes most of them terrible Christians. Think it's just not so common for me to see a terrible Buddhist get so far in UK politics ... Sad to see whatever the belief system being blatantly trampled on by those who claim it as their own.

The harshness of the OT is moderated by the New. The contrast between Jesus and Mohammed is stark - the one a healer and teacher, the other a warlord and killer and slaver. Verse 9:29 calls for violent take over of non-Muslims, survivors get to exist as bottom tier of an apartheid society

And yet, I hear that historically Jews were better off under Islam than in Christian regimes. And you get to do special pleading for "Jesus cancelled it" but Muslims are not allowed to quote hadiths. I call that special pleading.

Islam is the Man - Mohammed - and the Book - the Koran The Man beheaded the men and boys(6-800) of two captive Jewish tribes and sold the women and girls into slavery - to get more weapons and horses. According to tradition he owned a sword "Zulfiqar" - spine splitter Not exactly meek and mild

One’s oath should not be questioned without evidence that the oath-taker is prone to break oaths. Books on which they’re taken are window dressing or personal psychological reminders and should be ignored entirely by everybody else, unless they’re uniquely perfidious, like Mein Kampf.

Boris Johnson swore on the King James Bible. A few months later, he swore on the Jerusalem Bible that he had always been a Catholic (to nullify his first marriage).

It’s a rather archaic and pointless oath. I’m less interested in their allegiance to the Crown than I am in wanting them to act honestly, in good faith and in furtherance of the well being of the country. The oath should contain clear requirements along these lines.

I have often found in my 40 odd years when you meet people who tell you they are Christian people go "oh.." 🙂 it's considered a bit unusual to go to church if you are under 60 and such by people, a lot of us went to church of England schools but that's usually the end of it

A good half or more of the "God" group were POC..of various origins and faiths. PS: I used to go to church, I grew up rather loosely Catholic, then I figured out I did not have a faith, I just loved to sing in the choir..