Post

What is this obsession media has about knowing what's truly in the hearts of these people? We'll never know. Stop trying to psychoanalyze and report on their actions. Her actions are white supremacy. Period.

Why do we need a Turing test for fascists? If someone’s words and/or actions are indistinguishable from a fascist, then they are fascist. bsky.app/profile/thea...

The Atlantic@theatlantic.com

Does Megyn Kelly, the TV host turned YouTube polemicist, really believe what she’s saying? @sophiegilbert.bsky.social asks. She spent a week watching Kelly’s show to find out:

Who the f**k cares whether she really believes it? She profits from feeding hateful material to people who clearly *do* believe it. Whether she does it for love or money is irrelevant to the damage she is doing and her personal culpability for that damage. She should be shunned, not profiled.

“Megyn Kelly Says Sexually Assaulted Women are Liars, But Does She Mean It? Why We Should Be Nice to Megyn Kelly Instead of Sexually Assaulted Women Just in Case”, by The Atlantic

Literally no one cares. But here is a question...why do you phrase it this way for a life long bigot like her but if it is say Hasan Piker you word it in a much harsher light? What could it possibly be? (the answer is you don't want to believe a privileged Blonde Haired White Woman is evil)

She’s a white supremacist. She rode her sympathetic moment in 2016 for all it was worth. People thought she could be turned into something more moderate by showing her compassion. Instead, she hates far more than any love given to her.

Wow, what a super-important question for our times -- is this toxic millionaire agitpropper *really* a turd of a human being, or do they just pretend to be one for money (which is really the same thing)? This is why I let my subscription lapse. This and Prattleton's insufferable nonsense. 🖕

Polemicist: Someone who says it is OK for men to have sex with 15 year old girls and women who aren't attractive can't be raped. The Atlantic: An outlet that believes reporters can sus out a stranger's intent and motives by watching their YouTube vids.

Yep, questioning whether or not the fascist mouthpiece believes what she's saying is not a particularly interesting or worthwhile pursuit. She made $69M from her failed NBC stint and is choosing to do this for love of the game, not because she needs the money.

This article makes me realize that Charlize Theron played her in 'Bombshell'. I didn't know that. I've never made the connection between the woman in the movie and the woman I see so often in 'The Daily Show'

Who the fuck cares? She's horrible and says terrible things. End of story. She should be shunned by everyone. The Atlantic once again proves how pointless it is.

I don't know if there's anyone who has fewer principles and less shame than her and that's saying something in this day and age.

Decent people don't pretend to be a white supremacist, we just don't. We don't give platforms to Nazis and hate immigrants. She's who we see

I just don't believe that, no amount of money could make me support racism and hate. She believes what she says. She believes what she says, and should be treated accordingly. End of

"I have my suspicions.", the article concludes. Why? How? What? Once a person sells their soul, as Kelly has done, it's gone. Speculating whether she has a shred of humanity under her evil exterior is a fools errand. It's not exterior. It's evil all the way down.

Who the fuck cares if she believes it? She’s spewing lies, hatred and conspiracies. That’s what she must be judged on. I don’t give a single fuck if she “believes” it.

You’re always up to find any excuse for terrible behaviour that isn’t “these are simply terrible people” aren’t you? “Give it enough time and effort and you become what you pretend to be” applies here. When you whitewash like this what are you pretending to be? William Joyce?