Post

Myrtle Beach. Lived there almost 9 years, any sort of "walkability" is practically nonexistent, public transit seemed to consist of exactly two buses that ran to and from the mall. Horrid.

Almost any rural location. It might have an idyllic, walkable main street but just getting there + any other sites ( Door County WI, for example).

That part in the photo is far from the worst--you can get from Spanish Bay to the bottom of Spyglass Hill and at least have a reasonable shoulder with occasional painted bike lane signage. After that? Not only is there no bike lane, there's often no shoulder. At all.

The entire state of South Dakota seems to be constructed of tax loopholes and roadside attractions. No Amtrak, no international airport, and only four fixed-route transit systems in the state.

I’d say Orlando. Outside of the major resorts themselves, it’s totally unwalkable with lacking public transit. People clown on LA a lot but there are many tourist destinations you can get to by rail and even more accessible by bus and shuttle.

I'm thinking you can take your pick of the places in the middle of the country where you might find a Pirate's Cove mini golf course. Wisconsin Dells, Pigeon Forge, Branson, etc.

Setting aside the truly rural ones, I'd nominate Myrtle Beach, SC. Tons of golf courses (miniature and regular) and other attractions, but the transit is basically nonexistent.

Houston at least has public transit. My vote is the wasteland called Arlington, TX. Six Flags, Jerryworld, and a bunch of hotels. Zero transit, just subsidized Via.

Public transit is a joke here - I’m in the suburbs and never go into Houston bc there’s no reasonable transit options. I also agree that Arlington is terrible. We could do so much better everywhere!

The internal circulation when you get to a theme park is pretty good and bus service to theme parks from the city are fine. The central area doesn’t have great transit but it does exist and there is also the SunRail train.

Yeah I stayed on International Drive 10+ years ago and most hotels can provide bus service to the parks (Disney for us), plus there are plenty of restaurants within walking distance. So it's more than doable.

Bangkok, it's near-tied with London and Paris for top city in international arrivals and has barely any rail network and the tourists only go by cab. Wait, you mean "in the country" - in that case, national US tourism assumes cars, including in particular the modern National Park system.

Rome is really annoying by public transport - lots of hills and there are only 2.5 metro lines, with poor penetration into the historic center because it's extremely difficult to build in such an environment (as in, it costs 2-2.5 times as much as in the rest of the city).

Huh, that wasn't really our experience at all but we were only in the historic districts. But I'll tell you, it's a fantastic experience to walk up out of the subway station and you don't even recognize it at first, when it dawns on you that this is THE Coliseum.