Post

Something that hasn't been made clear: Firefox will have an option to completely disable all AI features. We've been calling it the AI kill switch internally. I'm sure it'll ship with a less murderous name, but that's how seriously and absolutely we're taking this. …

174 reposts579 likes

Too little too late. The fact that you're forcing AI into your browser and dropping privacy promises means you've already made the decision to stop caring what your users want, and instead do what Wall Street wants. The problem isn't the AI, its that you thought adding it was a good idea.

what privacy promises have been dropped? afaik, besides the buttons that just opens up a chatbot website of your choosing in the sidebar, everything runs locally and fully privately. there's no cloud involved. firefox is currently the only solution for fully private translation in the browser.

We also want an AI-blocker extension to keep us safe from generated slop. "This content as been marked as slop. Show anyway?" Like a spam box but for AI slop. We could report at the level of domains, pages or fragments.

I have been a long-time Firefox user, and I have been recommending Firefox to all my friends for years. But now I guess I’ll have to wait and see what the result is from all of this. I am staying on for now; please don’t disappoint your long-term users.

Why even do it then if it’s opt-in and most people probably will never enable it? Why waste dev time on this? What even are you adding? The nebulous statement of just being an “ai browser” is meaningless.

Could it have that name? It'll be cathartic for everyone who's sick of every company trying to shove this shit down our throats like we're foie gras geese. Hell, you could have it be the "Initiate Butlerian Jihad" button! Dune is cool! Have fun with it!

i really don't see how people can object to having fully local and private ai (transcription, translation, description, etc.) be opt-out instead of opt-in. it's obviously different if it could invade someone's privacy, using cloud services or something, but a fully optional feature is just a feature

i never use the password manager feature in firefox, but i have never felt the need to demand it be removed and fully opt-in... i can just not use it if i don't find it useful or i don't trust it

if you can disable it, then why are you bothering to integrate these features in the first place? what's with the "AI-first browser" bullshit? nobody wants this lol. you aren't even a publicly traded company!

This should have been in there when AI features were rolled out. Why is it still not here? Why promise to add a kill switch later, why not just do it?

The vast majority of (soon to be former) Firefox users are people who value privacy over all else, people who can't stand the bloated ad-ridden trash-heap every other mainstream browser has become, or people who simply want a browser that allows them to browse the web without getting in the way.

Problem is, you've ALREADY shipped AI features, pre-kill switch. Therefore, I've already switched browsers. It's currently easier to install a new browser than to dig through about:config for all the ML options, so that's what a lot of your users are doing.

An AI kill switch for the AI things you've already put in would be great. Except: if you're dedicated to being opt-in from now on, it should be an AI _enable_ switch. It should start off.

You should ship it with that exact murderous name. Even better, you should ship an installation that has NO "A.i." AT ALL. Thanks for the consideration.

(For real, thank you for posting this thread, @webdevs.firefox.com. This is good info to have. And I know you know, but please do know that millions of us fucking hate "A.i." and all the misinfo and fascism it pushes and really do not want it anywhere in our most used apps, even as an opt-in.)

I would personally interpret the near-unanimous negative reaction and the mass migration of users to other browsers as a sign that AI isn't worth investing the time, money, or effort to implement at all, "kill switch" or no. It should be crystal clear that this is simply unwanted in all forms.

I think one important step is that Firefox stops shipping with AI enabled by default. It was enabled in my machine in a new installation without my consent and this is not admissible. being opt-in means disabled by default which isn't the current state of things.

The best solution would be to not touch the hallucination plagiarism machines, the next best solution would be to have a package that doesn't even include them in the download.

Firefox went from being better than anything else to a solid fourth place for the last decade. I don't care if it's opt-in, I'm out! Convince your dumbass bosses to stop jacking themselves raw over the transmorphative interacticulation possibilities of dumbest malware of all time or fuck off.

The announcement is a disappointment; whether or not there's something in about:config to toggle off, it speaks to the desperation of the organization, its disregard for those who have used—even championed—Firefox for years as a sober, open alternative to other faddish, rapacious browsers.

All AI features will also be opt-in. I think there are some grey areas in what 'opt-in' means to different people (e.g. is a new toolbar button opt-in?), but the kill switch will absolutely remove all that stuff, and never show it in future. That's unambiguous. …

If you don't understand that opt-in for this has to mean "is not enabled by default and is never enabled except by specific user request" then your process has already failed. It has to be Off with an On button, not On with an Off button.

I've spoken to a lot of folks about what counts as opt-in. Some say a toolbar button that does nothing until pressed is opt-in. Some say the only acceptable opt-in is a build-time flag that would need manually compiled. So it's a grey area. Whereas the kill-switch is unambiguous.

Why are AI features not opt-in today? If today they're enabled by default without prompting the user, you already missed the opportunity to let the user decide. For real transparency Firefox should show a recap of all features previously enabled automatically without the user consent.

I'm not asking for faith in our direction - the thing I love about the Firefox community is how open, honest, and technical it is. But I do ask that you don't have the opposite of faith. Like, try not to be determined that we're going to do the wrong thing here. …

You already had my faith. For decades. But you've already done the wrong thing here, and that reveals Firefox has already lost it's way.

Messing with AI at all is already doing the wrong thing. It means you all care more about getting in the awful tech bandwagon than about our planet and the lives of everyone living in it. AI destroys the environment, makes people sick and kills them, steals jobs and intellectual property. Do better.

Claudie@clh2oars.bsky.social

There is *no* ethical use of genAI. It is built on stolen art, through exploitative labour, and every day as they train new model and answer query, they burn immense amount of energy & water. It has no place in our field, none.

It is also a spyware that steals our information and destroys our privacy, both things mozilla was supposed to protect. Can't stress enough how "it does not have AI" has been THE sales pitch for Firefox lately, it's what made people change from chrome to it and you all ruined it. And we WILL leave.

y'all already did the wrong thing by working w AI at all, every day millions of people scream on the internet about how sick they are of seeing it forced into their lives when they don't want it and every clown opining on its inevitability to try to keep it alive to save what's been invested in it.

there is no sufficient kill switch but to have never embarked on this path in the first place. the vast vast vast vast vast vast vast majority of people do. not. want. this. shit. the writing has been on the wall for ages and it was ignored. you want to do the right thing? walk it back entirely.

i set browser.ml.enabled to false when this started and yesterday i held leftclick on a link and it asked if i wanted to enable ai summaries. I think if you go to the effort of turning off ai in about:config it should float any other slop crap in an effort to boost discovery

if i turn the sloption off, i am never going to want to see it anywhere, and as far as i can tell that feature (the longpress link for summary) got pushed after all the initial blowback. which is why people have antifaith, and I think thats fair

We're not making assumptions you dipshits, you've straight up announced you're going to do the wrong thing. Embracing this plagiarism fueled digital snake oil is a bad decision, no matter how many options you include to turn it off

Thanks for clarifying! Unfortunately, even if I trust in the firefox kill switch right now, it is easy for future firefox to remove the switch or allow desired functions past it. The way to credibly regain trust is to never build the features in the first place, or to remove them entirely.

While deployment of the kill switch may keep me from ditching firefox immediately (the moment I saw the announcement I started looking for an anti-AI browser), it's going to take credible commitments from firefox to not do AI to keep me with firefox for the longer term.

As an organization, drop all plans for anything GenAI-related, promise to never touch it again, and have your wayward CEO apologize sincerely and unequivocally (and, optionally, resign). That is the only way to regain this trust.

Thanks Jake! I trust you as a person and your intentions a lot, so I hope you have enough power to steer that ship in the right directions! For me Firefox feels like a two-sided coin rn: glad Theo are here, glad they have an engine to not make Google and Apple the duopoly

Why.Add.It.In.The.First.Place? Also, why the fuck did your fucking CEO talk about it like he did? I know that you developers are not responsible for corpo shit, but the trust is ZERO right now, and your company needs to know that.

You can't with just this. Fire the CEO and roll back the AI browser bullshit, then work on actively making useful features for three or four years and ask again.

so far I can tell the dev team, that I will not return to Firefox proper. The ML was already implemented into FF without the Users knowledge and it was quite painful to disable. I did after 19 years switch over to Waterfox and don't think the new CEO can be trusted.

I don't think you or the rest of the Firefox team understand how you've blown it with your user base by giving into them "AI" FOMO and sneaking in ML settings that were auto-enabled. Take it all out!

If you want people to trust you you need to not enshittify your product. Customization to make the enshittification less severe doesn’t cut it. Build a browser that serves its users and not any profit motive, and if you can’t do it at Mozilla, do it elsewhere. Your talent is wasted there.

FWIW, I’m switching my desktop usage to Waterfox until I see some forward-looking demonstration of consistency in this approach. I don’t doubt that those working the technical side understand peoples’ frustrations but I’m tired of having to swap services because management found a new shiny toy.

The fact that Mozilla, represented always as 'for the web', is okay with even building in the most anti-web technology ever, built around scraping all our data without us getting asked (no opt in for that). Nah. Having ai even as an option is where y'all lost all the trust you built.

This is something that I like the sound of. It would be nice if there was some way to standardise the kill switch. So websites (squints at Google) didn't automatically respond with AI derived content.

Put the "AI" behind compile flags, and give us a download with all AI/AI integration, and the capacity for AI/AI integration, removed completely. That would be the bare minimum to take you seriously here.