between serbia, brazil, and hopefully november 3, a good reminder: voting works
it’s not the end, there’s always work to be done after the vote, but if you want to beat the motherfuckers and keep them out of power: vote your asses off
So the answer to "during his time on earth, did Jesus ever see an armadillo?" is: "the armadillo is nocturnal so it really all depends on what time of day it was when the Devil got round to showing him the Americas."
Watching all this unfold reminded me of Crayton's insight about how viewing ourselves as the "hero or victim, never the villain" is a mechanism of white supremacy.
Good is a thing we do. And in order to do it, we need to view "ally" as a verb, not an identity.
14/
The press is supposed to be a vital cog in the machinery of democracy. In Britain, it’s more of a protection racket for some of the very nastiest and most absurdly malicious people in our society.
This is key - many people will react positively to ideas they initially rejected once they get it.
Hard part is talking to them enough that they get it.
And you can convert the low info voters as you sell them on it! The whole idea is you sell them on your policies by educating them on the issue and convincing them that your ideas are good! You get them both - you just have to *talk to people*!
One of them hides. Other three pretend there never was a fourth crew member.
This works best if the one in hiding has a twin back on Earth who can pop up in the control room and shout “surprise!”
When they go round the moon, the Artemis astronauts will be completely out of contact for 40 minutes. What's the single funniest (yet feasible) thing they could do when they get back in touch?
Using AI to make medical decisions can risk your health, according to the largest ever study on the subject by the University of Oxford on large language models. They found LLMs tended to provide inaccurate and inconsistent information.
www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/...
It's not just the women and girls we know of. It's all their future work, and everything they could have been, and how we build structures that shelter their abusers. It's how a man's future has always been worth more than my past, present, and future combined.
I respect the UK dot gov designers so much because they understand this: there's no competitor or open source alternative to the government. There's just the one place to get these services (which are not only necessary but mandatory), and so the standard of the experience must be impeccable.
Public digital services need to be *so much better* than anything the market offers. You can't switch. You can't get fed up and choose to pay a bit more at Ocado than Sainsbury's because the UX is better. You can't opt out of public services because you're digitally excluded.
wikipedia turns 25 today! the last unenshittified major website! backbone of online info! triumph of humanity! powered by urge of unpaid randos to correct each other! somehow mostly reliable! "good thing wikipedia works in practice, because it sure doesn't work in theory" - old wiki adage
And @co-wheels.bsky.social plus a pedal bike for me and an e-bike for my wife means no need for two cars. Still makes financial sense to have one car (children's hockey and in-laws expensive by train), but not a second.
#Booksky Spooktacular 2025 Day 23: Feed is the start of @seananmcguire.bsky.social’s engaging and innovative riff on zombie fiction. It’s the first thing I ever read from her, full of exciting twists, and its landscape of a shifting news environment has only gotten more relevant with time.
A fault I see in UK politics: most of our political leaders speak and act like they're trying to follow what the public desire right now, rather than to lead us from where we are to where we "should" be.
This leads to nasty consequences.
3. Political discussion trends towards the simple; no-one important is willing to have complex discussions, because the average of public opinion is simple, and showing that you understand the complicated bits takes you away from following public opinion.
4. (seen today) Like in the example below, nobody is willing to correct the public when our "gut feelings" or "impression of the situation" are disconnected from reality.
Fine if it's about "what beer do I drink", not good when it's about "what policy should the country have".
Impression so far (and NB that I already thought this in a fuzzy way and I’m *still* a bit stunned by the gap): the public discussion is SO far off the reality as to be useless (and, inevitably, damaging) even before you look at its glaring racism.
So that’s horrible.
A fault I see in UK politics: most of our political leaders speak and act like they're trying to follow what the public desire right now, rather than to lead us from where we are to where we "should" be.
This leads to nasty consequences.
1. If we want the impossible, nobody's talking to us like adults about what the trade-offs are, so that we can move to wanting something possible.
Instead, we get things like "give us low taxes, high government spending, low government borrowing, no printing money (inflation)" going unchallenged.
2. Politicians become "all the same"; it's hard to tell politicians apart when they're not distinguishing their goals, but all saying "yep, we will deliver the solution you want".
Related; they appear unable to solve problems where I see a problem, but no solution.
I think this is a key insight into incel culture; it's about giving adult men the belief that 13 year old's fantasy relationships ought to be real, and that any other form of relationship involves giving up on enjoying life.
Like, the fuckin Manchid-Industrial Complex immediately grabs anything fun associated with being adult and infantilizes it down to tween boy level.
This is another reason comedy got to be so shit, by the way.
When I worked on The Office, Greg Daniels had a list of questions he asked of every story. Some were show-specific (eg “Are we saying something truthful if exaggerated about office life?”), but many are applicable to any script. Here’s a little thread on them…
🧵1/X
#Scriptsky#Screenwriting
🧵Spotted on Market Day in Aotearoa New Zealand:
A tiny human (1?) is helping Mum sell things. While Mum is greeting customers and taking payments--all one-handed. Tiny Human is propped on her hip, blowing big raspberry kisses of thanks. Giggle-snorting when people blow kisses back. (1)
There's a chunk of people not getting the UK's Online Safety Act.
The core problem is that the OSA assumes that (a) any device or connection might be used by an unsupervised child, and (b) that the world has to be child-safe by default.
Virtually all the issues with the Act fall out from this.
I've found a useful route to clarifying my thinking about AI recently: if you replace "company's AI" with "company's cheap employee", how does your opinion sound now?
For example, training an AI on a work is equivalent in this framing to the employee being trained on that work.
1/n
Prompting the AI and having it send you something is the same as prompting a person and having them send you something.
Pirating a work to train an AI is like pirating a work to train an employee.
An AI copying from its training set is like an employee copying from their books.
2/n
If your defence or criticism of AI companies feels wrong when you make this change, then you need to work out why, and justify it.
But a lot of criticism (like "they pirated my work for training data") survives this change, and in my mind, that makes those criticisms stronger.
3/3
One more thought on trans rights; they often show up the places where your partial solution to a problem caused by male chauvinist social norms is incomplete, or indeed rests on society-endorsed sexism.
1/3
For example, take women's DV shelters; if they refuse to take men, what does a mother of teenage boys aged 13 to 18 do to protect herself and her children from an abusive partner?
She can't take the children with her (they are effectively men); if she leaves them, she leaves them in danger.
2/3
Refusing to admit trans women for being "men" just shows up another hole in the solution - but it was already incomplete, and needed improvement for unrelated reasons.
And once you've fixed it so that a woman can bring her 17 year old son, you've fixed the trans "problem" too.
3/3
Note that the reason trans people are targeted is that they're an easy first target for bigots.
This is why trans rights matter - they are often the first group bigots come for (per Martin Niemöller's famous poem). And you want them there to speak out when the bigots come for you.
Shocked, SHOCKED I am, to see bigots committing bigotry.
(In other news: I would like to remind you that transphobia was also a Nazi policy, and they hammered it hard in 1933 because the trans population were isolated and had fewer friends than their other targets.)
They're an easy first target because they are rare everywhere. And many of them "pass" as cisgender in day-to-day life, which means that it's not surprising if you don't know anyone who's openly trans, making the bigotry abstract, not personal.
And we humans tend to defend our friends, and stay quiet when we don't think it affects us or people we know. That makes it very easy for bigots to claim a "silent majority" on their side (when in fact, the majority hasn't thought about it at all).
Note that the reason trans people are targeted is that they're an easy first target for bigots.
This is why trans rights matter - they are often the first group bigots come for (per Martin Niemöller's famous poem). And you want them there to speak out when the bigots come for you.
Shocked, SHOCKED I am, to see bigots committing bigotry.
(In other news: I would like to remind you that transphobia was also a Nazi policy, and they hammered it hard in 1933 because the trans population were isolated and had fewer friends than their other targets.)
They're an easy first target because, absent an external threat, there's no reason for them to cluster. Other groupings (like sexuality and religion) have reasons to gather together, and thus outnumber their attackers in any one location.
In 2016, I introduced you all to Eleanor West's Home for Wayward Children, a boarding school for survivors of fantastic adventures, unimaginable dangers, and other realities.
Reminder that one of my life principles is what I call the "Krissy Rule": If I were to do something and my spouse called me up and asked "what are you doing?" and I was tempted to lie to her about it, I DON'T DO THAT THING. This is a good rule that's mostly kept me out of trouble.