I'm not saying she's necessarily the stupidest person of all time, but she's definitely the person with the biggest ever gap between how clever they think they are, and how stupid they actually are.
277 reposts2.2K likes
I'm not saying she's necessarily the stupidest person of all time, but she's definitely the person with the biggest ever gap between how clever they think they are, and how stupid they actually are.
277 reposts2.2K likes
As this post seems to be getting seen, may I ask that anyone who does helps boost this one too - J.K. Rowling promoting transphobic sites that sell weapons is not something that should be known about by so few people.
Given J.K. Rowling's apparent desire to see Amnesty International in court, Amnesty may want to take a look into her endorsement of a site that not only incites violence against the trans community, but also sells the weapons required to enact it. terfipedia.com @terfipedia.com
My problem is, she wants everyone to be as stupid as she is. Not only does she not understand what a trans person is, she doesn't want to understand and doesn't want anyone else to understand either. She wants the world to buy her wilful ignorance and gets annoyed at anyone who tries to educate her.
This. All of this... 👏👏👏🏆 bsky.app/profile/neve...
Superb documentation of events. davisvanguard.org/2026/07/tran...
Besides the scorn and deep disdain, I also just laugh at JK Rowling's posts because she wants people to think she is some oracle-cult-leader-great writer, but it's always just a mishmash of hateful word salad that a narcissistic person thinks is clever. If she knew how to write, she'd be embarrassed
all of the modern dictionaries are on the internet. what are you on about? also yes, of course terf is in the dictionary. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/t... www.oed.com/dictionary/t...
bigotry IS by def irrational lol..also can't forget "trans/cis" are basic latin prefixes w/ basic purpose not just adj..so even if GC disagree w/ "transgender/cisgender" etc due to ideology, the words follow linguistic rules and serve descriptive purpose. ONLY through bigoted lens are they not valid