Post

Very true, I haven't been told to unailved myself thusfar. I've just seen these AI bros bullying artists just starting out. It's a difference in philosophy at a fundamental level people that think art is worthwhile and grifters thinking that it's an easy buck that don't respect art.

(also I did take a peak, nice work on what I did see)

Their rhetorical focus continually shifts just like the vanishing point in their “art.”

This is a classic rethorical approach used to villainize a group of people. It was used against jews in ww2, against gay people in the 80's and is being used against trans people today ("the enemy is weak/inferior but also controlling the world/dangerous at the same time")

"innovator" and "entrepreneur" are two of the biggest red-flags when they are self-applied (I'dalso consider adding "influencer" to that list but I just generally hate that term).

What artist?

Lmaaoo who is this mediocre man?

We're trying to get him to stop and reconsider his life choices. It's an intervention.

😂😂

"Do not dehumanize the dehumanization machine!"

It's not actually art, and the people using AI aren't artists. The stuff they produce via prompt and datacenters doesn't even deserve real criticism.

There's no work, that's what makes it slop. There's no execution to critique or process to debate, it's slop. Like, that's what people are SAYING when they call it "slop". They don't just mean it's bad; they mean you didn't even try, so why should they waste time delineating all the ways you failed

We can't deshumanize something that was not made by humans. wtf

i agree, artists are vulnerable to public judgement, thankfully people who churn ai slop aren't artists, fucking lol

"Shut up, slopboy, and go slop your slop around."

Their preoccupation with the way people criticize their attempts at making this BS is so tedious. And a fascism indicator. "We need to pass laws to make it illegal to criticize me."

Fine - if they don't want it to be called AI Slop they should also agree that original artists are not the gatekeepers. And that having artistic talent doesn't mean one is absolutely going to get rich and famous.

>the AI film industry cannot grow on a foundation of dehumanization I agree with this. But not in the way the author wants me to.

Isn't the whole point to grow an industry based on dehumanization?

AI slop excretor can't even format his own post.

Of course they’re artists! Much like how I am a “chef,” every time I online order pizza.

Every AI whinge: How do you expect us to make this business work if you keep 'Insert complaint here' Everyone: We don't

Counterpoint: we should, in fact, dismiss, shame, and publicly degrade slopsters who call themselves "artists" even more.

Where is the human ? Where is the art ?

I think strangling the industry in its crib is an excellent way to go.

The combo of his four stated "careers" make me certain he's a lickspittle dipshit who's never worked a day in his life, and shouldn't be trusted to carry a bag of dead fish to the dump. Just the worst vibes.

I've seen this before. He's not doing this to make art, he's doing this to back up lucrative corporate speaking gigs talking about AI to gormless investors

Guess it's working. Good.

This is textbook gaslighting

I’d respond with “Lol sounds like you make slop to me”

😂😂😂😂

“do not dehumanize the artist” 💀 this has to be rage bait

Luckily you can't dehumanize an artist who is neither human nor an artist. Problem solved!

0% chance he actually typed any of that response.

Calling it slop is the critique. Pretending that typing in prompts is art dehumanizes actual art, though.

Threats of good time will continue until harassment ceases.

"do not dehumanize the artist" They dehumanized themselves when they ask their alarm clock to barf out a video or image. It's like calling yourself a car mechanic when you tell the person at the garage to rotate the tires while they have it up for an oil change.

Again, obvious in retrospect, but it's so painfully ironic to me that these AI "artists" seem to want to make these greater emotional pleas for humanity like this but can't even write them by themselves

Holy motherfucking shit, did he really just motherfucking write that people are committing suicide because their work is getting reviewed negatively?

"meant to strip artists of dignity" Here's the neat part about that. They're not artists. They're thieves and hacks. :D

"AI filmmaking will only become a real industry if-" Imma stop you right there chief

I hope it does shame them

Ugh!! Everybody please stop slop shaming this precious lil baby! 👶🏻😭😭 Slop shaming is a genuine form of oppression and should be taken VERY SERIOUSLY. Don’t you people know that putting other people’s copyrighted work into a digital meat grinder is a HUMAN RIGHT?

I say this with all seriousness... there need to be laws against saying that I suck and that my little movies are dumb. There need to be legal repercussions for saying I'm a baby who wears diapers and poops in my diapers.

How does one dehumanize software?!?

The artist is code, not human. So Boo-fucking-hoo!!!

Maybe they should stop making slop then

I reject the term "AI artist".

Perfect, no notes.

AI slop prompters are not artists. They deserve whatever vitriol they get.

- Continuity? what's that? - Random flowers from... I'm sure I could go on but it hurts my soul to even think about this just UTTER garbage.

"Do not dehumanize" the what now?

If the movie was made by AI, then the artist isn't human to begin with, it's an AI.

Are these artists in the room with us?

When I order a pizza, I don't get to call myself a chef, even if I choose the toppings. They are not artists. They are technicians badly cosplaying as artists.

At least every second right wing movement is founded entirely on the wish to be able to claim that you are as persecuted as the minorities you oppress but without any actual danger.

Then me and my small business mentioned how its often like a five year turn around from beginning to profit when you are starting a company from scratch. His eyes bugged out of his head "five...years?" "Yea I mean you have the overhead cost to pay off and no one knows your product." Awk silence.

Lol, I don't want to live anymore if people disrespect a technology that came out a couple of years ago that I like.

Fuck off Nathaniel

They can go cry to their AI therapist rally, no one is reading a chatGPT manifesto of a nobody about a made-up injustice

Messed up to claim antis drove them to suicide, when chatbots are the ones telling people to kill themselves (or gun down classrooms full of kids for *attention*).

I'm confused. How does one "dehumanize the artist" when the "artist" is literally just some computer? Also, on an unrelated note, this objectively looks like crap.

"artists are taking their own lives" nearly took me out 😭 like just pick up a different hobby

I'm sorry where are the artists being dehumanized? All I see is a bunch of thieving assholes who are bitching that people aren't praising them for being thieving assholes

AI "artists" dehumanize themselves by surrendering their creativity over to the algorithmic plagiarism machine. We're just responding in kind.

The AI slop text is not helping their cause 🤣

Yes, he's correct. The term ai slop SHOULD make them feel shame and degraded for using such a shitty tool to "experiment" with. Unfortunately, the shame level isn't high enough, because they continue to "experiment" with it.

I mean, we're just calling the bucket like we see it and brother that's a bucket fulla slop.

Yes, but “AI slop” is a lot fewer characters than “cynical, soulless bullshit that doesn’t exhibit a thimble-full of creativity or humanity”.

So it's Transformers meets Terminator. So it's Transmorphers. Asylum Films did it 19 years ago. It was also terrible, but at least everyone who worked on it got paid: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmo...

Everything else aside this is an incredibly hackneyed premise that the dude seems to think nobody has tackled before

AT THE CENTER OF THE FUTURE IS ONE QUESTION: WHEN MACHINES...take over...WILL THEY BE BETTER THAN US? .... OR! Will THEY MAKE THE SAME MISTAKES WE MADE?

That’s like the most generic robot story.

I liked it better as Hyperion

Shouldn’t he be more worried about viewers committing suicide?

The only Human Error involved in this is believing that this is worth releasing.

Yikes. Did they think that looked good? Or even mildly interesting?

Biker in the back doing ‘take your child to work’ day lmao

Unreal Engine 3: The movie nobody wanted to watch

Yup. Also seems to not have a front brake lever either. Guess it’s for the best he’s not on the throttle

The trailer is coming in two weeks, once he pieces together 700 hours of absolute dogshit into a 30 second trailer that's also complete dogshit but not as dogshit as the rest of the footage.

⏰ This is your reminder! ⏰

Reminder set for May 26, 2026 at 06:14 AM CT

"Caught between two machine factions: The ones trying to save us. The ones determined to decide whether humanity deserves another chance." That stuck out to me.

That last sentence of that guy is the most ironic part of all of this.

You can’t create a similar message when the means from which you craft this media are the very kind of technology that’s bringing destruction to our race, both physically through environmental destruction and job theft, and spiritually through the degradation of art.

There is no such thing as an AI artist.

Calling it slop *is* critiquing the work. If the artist didn't take them time to draw or create something instead choosing an algorithm to hoover up art to steal and vomit up a cheap imitation that doesn't make sense, why would I want to see it...? This person to didn't take the time, why should I?

Certain parts are fine, when they talk about how artist suffer from public judgement and that it's wrong to dehumanise artists The only fallacy is that, as AI prompters, they are NOT artists. They are STEALING from artists to pose as them with the environment-destroying plagiarism machine. Fuckers.

i actually don't want ai anything to be a real industry

"Artists taking their own life due to hatred" = "i pushed a button and didn't receive instant praise, fame and money, i'm gonna kms"

'I think the people shamelessly stealing the work of others with zero effort and claiming to be artists should be treated respectfully and with dignity.'

The only AI "artists" taking their own lives are the ones being told to by their AI "girlfriends." The call is coming from inside the house.

He thinks it’s the criticism that “dehumanizes the artist”???

sloppers are not artists, sloppers are just vocal plagiarists ... his arrogance in claiming any of this slop would make him an artist, or that this ungodly slop he's polluting the internet with has any value is ... yeah, it's amusing. All I'm reading is we should call this slop out even louder!

So he's telling us that, by being persistently mean to these dorks, we can stop the "AI Filmmaking Industry" from ever existing? Gosh, that would be terrible. Huh.

He's so proud of his "Proprietary" AI Engine yet everything it produces is bordering on Birdemic levels of bad. If this wasn't on LinkedIn, I'd think it was satire.

Should be called grift, scam, abomination against decency, art and humanity, a cultural and climatic disaster... So slop is almost a compliment to something that only deserves shame and fire.

AI aside, I'm getting really sick of these grandiose rants from the mediocre. For all their catastrophizing, they only care about money and self-interest. Not getting easy money is their great tragedy.

What does he even mean "dehumanize the artist"? There is no fucking artist. There's a talentless greedy *investor* typing a poorly worded prompt or whatever the fuck software agent is cybershitting this stuff out. Where's the damn artist? It's an atrocity. More video nasty than Cannibal Apocalypse.

"Don't dehumanize the artist" Hm. What would you call 'stealing artists work, feeding it into a machine, reprocessing it to remove all traces of originality, and then representing it as your own'?

I assure you, no artists were harmed or upset by the humiliation they received and rightly deserved

Fine then. It's shit, their shit, it has no artistic merit because it isn't art. If it was food I wouldn't feed it to a pig. Is that better than me just calling it slop.

Didn’t they dehumanize actual artists when they trained their AI without consent?