Post

Should we run the list of times that various Senate Dems decided to support whichever Trump appointee was next on the list? If they can’t show even the slightest intention of standing against the Nazis NOW, there’s no reason to think they will at any other point in time.

You guys always seem to think that criticism of any Democrats must automatically mean support for Republicans. No, dude. I think that Democrats should stop trying to be Republicans if they actually want to beat them.

Can you give me a specific example of Democrats “agreeing” with MAGA policy? If you like you can explain it like Crash Bandicoot or whatever IP meant for 12 year olds you’ve built your personality around.

Got any other brain teasers? bsky.app/profile/erin...

Erin Reed@erininthemorning.com

SC Dem Senate nominee Annie Andrews released an ad calling trans women "biological men." She embraces sports and surgery bans for youth. Her campaign even says she won't work to overturn the HRT/blocker trans youth ban. She once argued against capitulation. Subscribe to support our journalism.

Are you dumber than dirt? Compare any deep blue state with a deep red state policy wise and NOPE, NOT EVEN REMOTELY THE SAME, ya dumbass

If it's just spoiled crackers who might take issue with them (coughMichigancough), and they're already "beating the fuck out of the Republicans," sounds like they've got this in the bag already. After all, don't Dems often enough expect progressives to not even show up? Then criticism is no issue.

Progressives are fine, leftists are the issue. True progressives will always oppose Republicans. Leftists both-sides everything and wait for revolution.

If "true progressives" are equivalent to democrats, since democrats are the only option other than Republicans (which is implied by the use of "both-sides"), then "Republicans" just means anything that isn't actively Democrat, and whatever the Democratic party does is definitionally progressive.

There are only Democrats and leftists here to be attacked. What I want to know is why Democrats are attacking my Muslim and trans compatriots. There has been one reason, and one alone, that I've been voting D; the veneer of inclusivity. And the Ds are ditching it.

Democrats can't offer alternatives: back Democrat Muslim who act like socialists to attract ignorant uneducated crowd but really promoting Muslim agenda and Palestine.

It’s looking like my rights aren’t going to be at the very least debated every single election cycle because people like you are too scared to stand up to DINOs. Fuck off then fuck off some more

I just posted this today, I can do two things at once bsky.app/profile/doll...

Dollop of 'Ween 🫠@dollop-of-mayo.bsky.social

why is everybody crowing about trump's approval rate, he could go down to -500% and he'd still be sitting in the oval office fucking everything up for everybody but I guess the upside is we'll get more democrats in office to wear little pocket squares at him or whatever we're pretending is defiance

I don't owe fealty to the party that won't fight for anybody but corporations and who pals around with Liz Cheney, that's why you have Trump well Hillary is the reason you had Trump the first time Sorry that I notice things which make your worldview seem idiotic

I like Drew but he's a professional shitposter with exactly no responsibilities outside of his own family. The media doesn't blast out everything he says. He doesn't have backseat political strategists biting his ankles 24-7. But why focus on this bullshit before the GOP has lost?

Because Chuck Schumer cannot, must not be Senate Majority Leader. That marker has to be laid down now. Where is Chuck Schumer, top ranking Democrat, during this election cycle home stretch? Hiding because he’s the least popular Democrat in America and toxic AF. No. Mas. He needs to step down.

How fuckin dare you call us privileged? My medication access keeps getting threatened every fucking election. “Vote for us or we won’t protect you from the bloodhungry christianists!” You fucks are HOSTAGE TAKERS

This is maga bait,aimed to divide. Many Dems running to defeat MAGA, on various platforms. All the states are not the same. I'm liberal nonpartisan,caucus with Dems. I don't want another MAGA Fetterman,but to think a PA or IA candidate will be as liberal as my state CA,is naive.LET'S KICK MAGA ASS!

Have these guys offered a single detail about how they plan to do this? Especially since the last president had no problem keeping Trump 45's tariffs in place?

"Dems NEVER do anything for the working class!" "Our top priority will be making groceries affordable for hungry people" "OMG! I want a show trial to be FIRST! Fuck hunger, give me a circus performance!"

Yes I want to hear that. I'm honestly a little scared that any "affordability" measures that get by Trump (and he has the veto!) would be a complete horror show with more gotchas than one can count.

In real life the most recent admin they passed a massive jobs, climate, and healthcare bill and inflation hammered down immediately Also... it literally doesn't matter? The whole point of the opposition party is to shit all-over the incumbents, having plans is frankly counter-productive

"You say that while you were piloting the plane you kept altitude while flying through a hurricane, and yet, now that we've given a braindead rapist all the controls the plane is tailspinning downwards, so how good of a pilot could you be?🤔" Truly thought-provoking stuff...

that was the admin that decided they were going to be Tough On Iran, Tough On Immigration, and Tough On Trans People in order to keep the republicans from gaining power, yes remind me. how'd that go.

honestly i think this is a problem that will solve itself the base will demand blood, Trump will force a confrontation, and any bills they hope to pass are DOA (Trump vetoed his own party’s housing bill!) chuck might not wanna do hearings, but too bad. it’s gonna happen

It's frustrating because they can't do the things that will address living costs without stopping the lawlessness. Which isn't going to happen without some actual consequences. It sounds like some Dems, including leadership, are thinking they can just bipartisan bill their way out of this 🤦

They can probably do it if they win both Chambers and targeted specific Republicans essentially saying vote with us or we will release all the documents that show what slime bags you are. But since the Democrats have stocked themselves with their fair share of slime bags that will never happen

Liberals angry at Defector: If you are in line to angrily comment, stay in line. Once you’ve been blocked you won’t have to hear from the left any more.

The kinds of things you want to happen after this election simply *cannot* happen unless enough Republicans in congress decide to go against their mad king. That's not something the Dems control. Not trials, not jail, not removal from office. Find 10-15 R votes in the Senate and get back to me.

Wow, so your are saying your plan is fucking stupid and impossible. Literally to mind control republican politicians using nothing?

Yeah sure, if you feel like dooming, I can't stop you. I didn't say nothing will happen. Just the article wants the things that can't happen yet, and is already blaming ppl for it failing, which is just dumb. And we'll need those Senate seats for Pres AOC.

And that sucks! But unless you want to to start just shooting people, not even the ghost of John Brown can change the removal rules or override a veto.

It's especially rich for 3rd party chuds to complain that Dems don't care if they lose, given that their entire political persona is *literally* centered around losing and casting protest votes. And what does it even mean to say that the 2 party system is "too big to fail"? 🧵

Magary clearly has no idea what the phrase means. It refers to an institution whose failure involves catastrophic systemic risk, and hence should not be allowed to happen. It doesn't mean something that is so entrenched that it cannot fail, which is what he meant to say.

Also, "even if you lose an election, you'll just end up with a better paying job working for the same machine" applies far more to grifters like Jill Stein than most grassroots Dems working on actual governance instead of forever being just a grifting gadfly.

It must be so nice to have enough money and security to not need government assistance. You can just hold onto your dick all day, confidant that no changes to anything will effects you.

you realize establishment democrats don't want you to have government assistance either, right? the entire point of criticizing the democratic party is that they do not care about you being poor. you do not matter to them.

newsoms plan to fix his deficit was to try and cancel healthcare for people with disabilities who happen to luck into having 2k in their bank account. there is a housing shortage in the state, especially for those with vouchers and the like. when he tried this, no 1 bedroom apts were less than 2.3k.

God you twat that word was invented by communist to critique people supporting mowing down non authoritarian communist don’t use words you don’t even know how to use

the fact that conservatives within the party reject the good stuff they propose is an indictment of their party not of sanders or aoc.

If being seen as chumps is damaging to the Democrats I would strongly suggest that they stop being chump-like