Post

Are their executives sexual predators?

this endangers chdren when I worked with kids, we had disclaimers on every permission slip informing parents/guardians that we may take photos at events and trips, and they had to check that box if they didn't, we would be sure not to photograph their kids

Wasn’t he at the Pedo-In-Chief’s inauguration? Birds of a feather, and all…

What.the.fuck

They're pretending evil doesn't exist.

“Attention farmer caught using kids as cattle”

Whether it's ads for pedophiles, AI that engages in sexting with children, supporting genocide in African nations, pushing AI softcore porn of celebrities, doing nothing about numerous consistent scam comments, or developing AI glasses that no one wants and do not work, Meta is going places!

META appears to be missing the point of the criticism deliberately. Sadly, this tone deafness is a sign of the times.

I didn't know about this and I have a group I'd love to wean off of FB. Thanks for sharing!

Yeah you might end up pushing a guy off the roof of your bar

Faine, fuck. *shakes head no*

Shut meta down

Zuckerberg is a pedo pimp?

And they are standing by it! "Meta, the $2tn (£1.5tn) company based in Menlo Park, California, said the images did not violate its policies. "

Time for everyone to cut their ties with Meta. Remember that in 2016 they sold our data to Cambridge Analytics who targeted voters with misinformation to vote for Trump. CA bragged they helped Trump win the election. Maria Ressa stated Duterte followed the same playbook.

I’ve had IG recommend prom pics to me, a grown man who doesn’t want to see stranger’s prom pics… and even if I did - what kind of unhinged company would indulge that?

If only there were clues that Meta was sympathetic to a massive nonce.

Anyone who knows what you've done should know you would be impossible to surprise Also, i hope zuckerberg slips and falls into a 19th century tanning vat like one of my ancestors famously did

The mask dropped because there are no repercussions; a one day news cycle and then it’s back to business as usual.

Après cet épisode... Sans commentaire www.reuters.com/investigates...

This is beyond disgusting. What a vile man and companies.

You have to ask why parents are posting photos of their children on insta in the first place. Take some responsibility people!

And yet, people would rather tolerate evil than give up mind numbing distractions like Facebook, Threads, Twitter, TikTok, etc

this is NOT an indictment of JUST meta yes meta is evil: they should have PROTECTIONS in place to prevent this sort of thing from happening BUT the algorithm that did this LEARNED WHAT WORKS by statistically analysing actual people's behaviour: MANY MIDDLE AGED MEN RESPONDED TO THIS ADVERTISING

It may very well have been driven by algorithm not some person being like "I know what we should do!" But of course that doesn't make it better, in fact in terms of doing anything about it, it makes it worse.

It's almost like his one "good" idea (which, frankly? stolen) was a digital smash book that escaped containment and at this point is a stitched together empire of bloat made of reasonably good things he bought and made worse. No wait that's e x a c t l y what it actually is.

And people are still on Meta because??

Maybe the billionaires aren't our friends after all

They were pretending not to be evil? They weren't doing a very good job then.

likely that those are the sort of images those guys look at probably a second or two longer than the others they scroll past. Meta took note and their alg served up these insta pics. Not excusing any of it, I stopped with FB years ago.

Well… Facebook was created to rate female students at Harvard. Misogyny rules.

I think the only 'community standard' that Meta has, is that you cannot criticise Trump.

A/B testing probably got us here. I am sure they are following empirical data. The engineering version of throwing up your hands and saying, “boys will be boys”.

This has happened before, though it wasn't quite as cringe; there was a time when someone found a photo of his own wife being used as a promotion.

As true today as it was when I said it five years ago: That entire company will have to be deleted. No breakup. No managed divestment. Just plain gone.

Remember when everyone kept copy/pasting that "hey FB, my pics belong to me, you don't have my permission to use them" post back in 2008? We all reminded users that when you create your account you agreed to them owning your pics, but no one listened? And now we're here! Stop using meta ffs!

Wait till Zuckerberg starts harvesting the data from his new "AI glasses"..... this is where the sick fuck is going...

The "back to school" parenting folks might want to meet up down the pub (or at the coffee shop) and show photos there. The Internet is about to get very unsafe for everybody. Most of us should create address books and get off Facebook.

Jesus

"These products brought to you by a guy who made a directory of how hot his female college attendees were. Nothing to see here."

Needless to say (or is it?) if you remain on Nazi websites you are contributing to the Nazi project. Get off all Meta sites. Get off X. Get off tiktok. It isn't worth the dopamine hits. You will still be able to reach your people.

Was it a Republican man? Because that would probably work.

Meta leadership is lousy with Republican operatives too.

Stop putting your kids on the mofo internet. Text grandma and auntie the photo. This isn't hard, people. How do you know some perv isn't wacking it to your kid? Does everyone have narcissistic personality disorders or what??????? Good lord.

Look, Trump told them to make the AI more Republican so Musk made MechaHitler and Zuck made Child Predator bot.

The article did not mention whether any of these outraged parents deleted their accounts after this. They should be upset but it's also a problem if they didn't leave the platform immediately. I hope people start behaving more cautiously with what they post online. These companies can't be trusted.

Yes.

"With 267 followers, her Instagram account usually had modest reach but the post of her child attracted nearly 7,000 views, 90% from non-followers, half of whom were aged over 44 and 90% of whom were men."

Dump Meta. They sexualize young girls for profit. And they do it using YOUR pictures. Add them to your boycott list: Tesla, Target, Disney...Meta. Take back your life. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

Even if your cursor hovers over a reel while scrolling the page, it'll show teens dancing in their underwear. I did click on one of these 3 years ago, trying to find the "..." button to make it go away, and ever since then I wonder if they put me on a special "suggested posts" list.

I only ever used Facebook to keep in touch with some local gaming and pagan groups that posted events there. I quit using it because it kept serving me Threads advertisements with videos of women breastfeeding.

This is so sick. Zuck is just casting the net wide, trying to build pedo-Twitter.

endless short videos of egirl gooner content. Earlier this year they changed the algorithm I guess, because those were largely replaced with right-wing agitprop. Now THAT has mostly been replaced with reactionary slop, obvious genAI clips of stationary people holding signs about immigrants.

Eeeeew

I say again, Zuckerberg belongs in jail.

I got suspended for a few days for posting a screenshot of a hateful message I got. I had originally posted it to a group, but it was reported for some reason. It was a message of someone saying that I should have my n-word brains beat out with a baseball bat.

If it's against MAGAts, it's enforced. If you compliment someone, your post is removed, but if you get death threats, that's totally fine. They've been fk'd up for 20 years, zuck isn't suddenly going to grow a soul.

Facebook platformed a genocide in Burma/Myanmar a decade ago. None of this should be surprising.

Bc talking to an actual girl was never going to happen...

FB has put this type of content in my feed regularly. It’s gross

Jail Zuckerberg already

Trump II has been a real boon to the world's pedophiles

Meta, implicitly: "It's not our fault that our most engaged male customers are a bunch of pervs."

I’ve been thinking recently about the whole “future is private” push they made in the cambridge analytica days, using the outrage from that as justification to further lock down their platform + login gate instagram.

Who knew a morally bankrupt, friendless incel who lucked out when the socially popular Winklevoss twins hired him to write some code for them, then teamed up with another coder to release the idea as his, would see nothing wrong with morally bankrupt behavior?

Catering to MAGA

For a time, Facebook kept showing me "Reels" of scantily clad women, some appearing to be underage. It was really disturbing. Some even had brief nudity. They changed it to cooking demonstrations, which is fine now, but wtf

For about three months Google couldn’t decide if I was a doctor, lawyer, or professional industrial scuba diver. My ads mix was disjointed. No cleavage though.

I figured it out 😆

Dude! My man. Simpatico! I am 1,000,000,000% agreeing with you. That’s the thing about the guardian signing statistics. My real life example is fucking creepy. I want nothing to do with 16-year-old showing cleavage. But Instagram pushes this stuff hard. It should be illegal, and is dangerous.

Zuck is also trying to silence and bankrupt this whistleblower: www.theguardian.com/technology/2...