Post

Ah, yes, the invaluable wisdom of the markets.

494 reposts3.5K likes

It kills me because they're so wrong *all the time.* And dudes like Nate Silver or Harry Enten have been citing them for a decade now & like... they're supposed to be smart. How many times do you have to get burned before you realize the people betting in prediction markets are stupid?

Hahaha an analysis of who participates in these markets in one image. Thus completes my PhD in Political Data Analytics. Claude, please update my CV accordingly.

It’s crazy because it was the exact opposite with Talarico betting markets read that race right the whole time even when polls had Crockett up. GOP side not so much.

I'll probably get flamed for this. I wouldn't trust shit with 62K$ volume. Not sure when it has statistical accuracy, maybe 200M$? I'm sure some math nerd could come in and say... Still, agreed. At 200M$, a billionaire, or a couple of them could influence easily. It's just another data point.

The sophomore Psych major is taking a business class this semester (her dad talked her into it), and the stuff she texts me is both hilarious and concerning. She’s pretty sure the guy teaching the course is living in his own reality. What are the odds they’re *all* sniffing the same glue?

There is enormous money in manipulating social media conversations to make one outcome seem more likely than it is and taking idiots money, which is likely what happened here too.

If you understand how gambling works then you’ll know how ridiculous that statement is Or Texas is extremely corrupt

Economists, sadly. Prediction markets are a bit like crypto. People thought they might be awesome from a theoretical standpoint, but nobody considered the side effects they now have in practice. The thing that got me interested in economics is how much bad economics I have to tolerate every day.

Polling is a sample to determine outcomes. A prediction market with an outcome of 70% probability of a thing happening (for example), does not give that thing a 70% chance of happening. It's simple what dollar amount a group of people are willing to risk and for what reward.

If the markets get big enough, people will hire private pollsters to poll races to find markets that are way off of reality and might even buy ads or publish hit pieces to tilt the races even more in their favor.

Like if you place a 10 million dollar bet on a candidate winning how much would you be willing to spend paying someone to falsely accuse the other candidate of something awful a week before the election. The whole thing is bad for democracy.

It's like options trading. Either it strikes in the money and you can go buy yourself a Lambo or it strikes out of the money and all your savings are gone. Someone probably made a shit ton of money buying the supposed underdog position here. Everyone else lost.

Oh - he was busy posting about what? bsky.app/profile/nate...

Nate Silver Tweets@natesilver538bot.bsky.social

In the final few years of these, forget which airline, there was a 5-page profile of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan at one point, I think they literally ran out of cities after that. https://nitter.net/conorjrogers/status/2028676942493606058 Original post

If it were that easy I'd simply bet on every 60/40 (or whatever threshold) event each morning from the deck of my yacht in Bermuda. Betting markets are made for profiting off inside information. Otherwise it's just gambling.

Prediction markets are only informative as to who is placing bets. This excludes include women, working poor, elderly and tons of other voting groups. The markets got lucky with the 2024 elections because of the huge wave of younger men who both voted R and are active in prediction markets.

It still doesn’t predict shit even when there is insider trading! Even worse when the betting insiders are in a position to leak misinformation (length of Trump’s SOTU) they will lie!

Toronto Will@torontowill.bsky.social

Not to be lost in this, but if you look at the chart in the article, Polymarket didn’t predict shit, the odds were near zero until the last minute. And that’s *in spite* of the fact there seems to have been some insider trading ahead of the event.

We’ve quickly gone from “twitter is not real world” to “bluesky is not real world” to “TikTok is not real world” to “prediction markets are not real world” - the last one however could cost actual $$& to be proven wrong