Post

This is what happens when a director conflates a parable with real-world nuance. No, we don't need to "both sides" this tale because Dickens wrote the story as it was meant to be understood. Scrooge made mistakes and needed a wakeup call. That's it.

The A.V. Club@avclub.com

The film, which stars Johnny Depp, will try to find the "gray area" in A Christmas Carol. www.avclub.com/scrooge-gray...

452 reposts2.4K likes

And I thought I was the only person who reads the actual book every Christmas, and catches all the movies. (and if you haven't ever seen it, "The Man Who Invented Christmas" is a fabulous fantasy of Dickens writing the story) Agree with you, I'll give this one a miss.

This is exactly what I expect to see from a culture that puts billionaires first and idolizes "business" as the apex organization. What a colossal bummer this is.

Whatever motivated a middling director like Ti West to remake a classic written by CHARLES DICKENS, one of the greats of English literature? Someone is a little high on his own supply.

In fact, people zero in on Ebenezer's greed, his most obnoxious trait. But his real sin was lack of joy. The misery of his own life was what made him cause misery to others. All his money mattered not at all. His house was filled with nothing but haunting memories and bitter regrets.

People with lots of money are making a movie telling us that sacrificing your family for money and then sacrificing the well-being of poor people for more money can actually be good. Amazing. I mean, they've been saying it for decades, but now they're dropping all subtlety about it.

Are we seriously turning a story with an extremely easily read moral into a retrospective on Scrooge maybe being right?? Stop "yes, but"ing bad characters, please. They're written that way on PURPOSE. "Maybe the millionaire who wants the poor to freeze & the homeless to suffer is onto something. 🤔"

Fs And of course the real “charming, butter wouldn’t melt in his mouth” Johnny Depp turning an ar$ehole into a sympathetic character. Perfect casting and changing reality. Talk about alternative “facts” ( I know it’s fictional)

You know this is bad when this version looks better in comparation( It have some strong moments tbh like when scrooge see eye to eye for a whole minute the face of Cratchit after he lose his son...that's a good scene)

(3/3) For the working classes and the poor, especially, times were extremely tough. The country was also undergoing mass industrialization, with families flocking to overcrowded cities and the demand for work being such that even children were sent out to seek employment."

And it's not like Scrooge gets no narrative sympathy in the original. His unhappy childhood is portrayed pretty sympathetically, and he is ultimately redeemable and goes on to live a happy life after he reforms. You don't need to "both sides" an "I was a miserable bastard but I got better" story.

"Maybe Scrooge was right-" he was not. He was a miserly asshole facing the same demise as his former business partners if he didn't make some serious changes with how he treats the people around him. That's the point.

My favorite version, the Alastair Sim one, explicitly makes the point that Scrooge takes the wrong lessons from his life: seeing the world as a cruel place for the poor, he becomes cruel and rich himself rather than trying to change the situation and help others, still a relevant message for today.

"We are proud to announce that we are finally going to explore the nuance and background hinted at in the classic story, 'There's Really No Nuance Here, Nor Is His Backstory Necessary, This Guy Is Just a Piece of Shit.'"

Scrooge's backstory is meant to recontextualise him as a tragic figure, not a wise one. His is a story of Christian grace - by a miracle, the tragedy of a hard and bitter life making a hard, bitter, sad and lonely man is averted and his kindness brings life and joy to his community.

The story endures because we can see Scrooge's faults and reflect on mistakes we've made ourselves, and know that we can learn from them and grow into better people for it. Regardless, no one will make a better adaptation than the Muppet version, so just watch that instead.

I think the MLP episode did a really good job of it too. The future part of that wasn’t simply, “You will die lonely and unloved”, but also, “Everyone else will fall into ruin and die because your framework is fundamentally wrong.” Goes pretty hard for a kids show.

I’ve seen adaptations that are very fair to Scrooge and explore the tragic ways he became the way he did. These adaptations still understood that the core of the work is the part where the ghosts show up and go “YOU GET WITH THE PROGRAM RIGHT THE FUCK NOW OR YOU’RE ON THE EXPRESS FERRY TO HELL”

That's my go-to favorite, with the George C. Scott version as a second. I guess there's so many good versions, they decided there needed to be a version that's stupid and misses the entire point of the story. 🤷

One of my faves was always the older version of A Mickey's Christmas Carol, because it was usually played alongside Mickey and the Giant Beanstalk.

I remember thinking after seeing "Pearl" that maybe Ti West can build himself up to be a consistently good craftsman. Boy was I wrong! Instead he's hedging his bets on an enshittified version of a classic starring a washed-up abuser.