Post

Despite Minnesota having a lower fraud rate than average and trump pardoning so many people convicted of fraud. Also, he himself, is a fraudster and lifelong criminal. Sexual assaulter too. Such bullshit. Impeach Convict Remove

Push back. Speak out. We’re sick of what this cruel corrupt $bribecoin pedophile protection regime is doing to our country to the good people of MN! #resistandunsubscribe Support fight for rule of law & humanity w/ Democracy Forward, ACLU, Indivisible, 5calls, 50501, MoveOn, DSCC, & a free press ACT

By John Roberts' own reasoning, voting rights are 'too coercive' to democracy. Gee, amazing they hate expanded voting rights. Who ever thought they would link Medicare to voting rights?

When fraud is happening in the entire administration Vance is "worried" about "fraud" that was basically claimed by a MAGA YouTuber without any real proof...

Tip of the iceberg. They’ll stop social security checks to investigate “fraud” soon. And it won’t just be in Minnesota. The question isn’t whether it’s going to happen but what we’re prepared to do about it.

I feel like your headline could better explain how legitimate those concerns might be. Maybe "...because they claim there are fraud concerns." Last I recall, we don't "preemptively stop" services just because they might be abused. That's just collective punishment and is a hallmark of dictators.

Minnesota couldn't possibly make the vindictive prick look more like a vindictive prick than the vindictive pricks current actions do

Incompetent regime punishes Americans in Minnesota by withholding medical and behavioral health treatment after illegal revocation of Federal Medicaid funding. This includes well child checks, Moms for “Liberty”.

“Fraud” is a new Trojan Horse for Trump. It becomes the justification for the admin’s inhumane and cruel policy toward immigrants. Can’t deport them, so he will with hold basic human needs.

You don't have to print the obvious lies of a known liar and give them the benefit of the doubt in your framing. This is not about fraud concerns. You don't have to repeat that. In fact, you can call it a lie. That is, in fact, your job.

This Administration announces funding cuts to Minnesota regularly. It is retribution. It has nothing to do with fraud. They would probably have a better investigation had Trump and Vance’s DOJ not run off federal prosecutors and FBI agents in Minnesota.

And there's no fraud in red states? Gimme a break. More Federal over reach into states' rights. Oz couldn't be specific in the presser about exactly what Minnesota needed to provide to Feds to fulfill their specs.

The media needs to stop using their language "fraud". This is a mob shakedown by the trump regime to get a blue state to capitulate. trump is a traitor to the US and a danger to the world.

and other good books you should read: >Freedom from the market by Mike konczal, >Spoils of war by Andrew Cockburn, >Evil geniuses by Kurt Anderson, >The shock doctrine by by Naomi Klein, >The people's history of the united states' Howard Zinn, >The reactionary mind by Corey robin,

Philip Esformes: A nursing home operator convicted in 2019 for a $1.3 billion Medicare and Medicaid fraud scheme, was the largest ever charged by the DOJ at the time. His sentence was commuted by President Donald Trump in 2020, but he later pleaded guilty to a lesser charge.

The biggest fraud regime in our history is taking revenge on their enemies as if WE were the ones conducting fraud. More lies. More projection of their own acts. More cruel abuse of American citizens. trump and his complicit Republicans are full of hate and rage against us.

Trump and his administration get off on inflicting pain,suffering and humiliation to children, migrants and people of color. A party of sadistic fascists.

I'm taking this as an absolute admission that it is not, and never has been, about fraud, and was always about punishing US citizens.

Federal Impoundment can be stopped, the U.S. Constitution gives the "power of the purse" to Congress, the President cannot unilaterally refuse to spend money that has been legally appropriated. If a President attempts to withhold funds, there are three primary "brakes" that can be used

Judicial Review, the Supreme Court has historically sided with Congress on this issue. In the landmark 1975 case, the President doesn't have the power to withhold funds that Congress has mandated. If an administration ignores the ICA, state governments affected by the loss of funding can sue.