Post

Data is based on a flawed samples. You sampled the ENTIRE grape and likely most of the melon while you only sampled a very tiny fraction of the earth. Had you been able to sample the entire earth with it's warm creamy nougat inside, then the entire premise of this chart could disintegrate.

This doesn’t factor the moon being made of cheese. Also the earth having a cool crunchy refreshing outer with a warm eggy interior sounds like an experience. I think this diagram needs an alternate perspective.

❤️👍 but neither is the earth or moon… but to first approximations everything is a sphere in physics… as the higher order irregularities wash out quickly with range…😂😂😂

Oh no youve done it now. Its going to be cheese, its always cheese, right now someone out there is looking at this post as a challenge, cheesemakers are strange, they seek the challenge in everything and right now one of them is thinking I could fulfil the prophecy of a huge tasty ball, no problem.

The tastiness function is a summation of all the components. The earth has small bits of tastiness which make up a small portion of its overall volume, giving it a marginally higher tastiness.

Judgment on moon and earth tastiness reminds me of toddlers trying new foods. Just putting your tongue on it doesn't count as actually tasting it.

According to the data pluto will be more tasty than our moon. To bad we cannot prove it. And atoms musst be a great pleasure. How delicious will be neutrons an electrons? What about entering the area of negative size? I guess this will be heaven.