Post

what really broke my mind recently is that there isn't just "0" (zero) but +0 and -0 and they are not the same?! and everyone knows /0 is NaN (divide by zero is not a number) but did you know ∞ x 0 (infinity times zero) is also NaN? that was new to me and I don't completely grasp it yet

I love the idea of a baker's pair. The baker's thousand, associated with Arabian nights, is divisible by a baker's half-dozen, ten and dozen. A baker's string quartet has a double bass or a second cello. Bakers use the concept of a Baker's couple to justify infidelity.

First web page in '94. php? A sitting duck; always has been. Thanks to AI for finally fixing it!

Some anthropologists that study tribes that communally share and therefore do not account have found the numbers that are named are surprisingly few. Like anything over "four" is a "handful." Source: Here's Looking at Euclid by Alex Bellos

And there are contexts where this makes sense in the western world as well. We do not measure grain in number of individual grains. There becomes a point when an exact count is gratuitous. For some cultures that threshold is so low it impacts number theory itself.

The PHP Foundation warns that, thanks to Chainguard, attackers can already study the fix in binary form: 11

Maybe replacing mathematicians by AI was not such a good idea after all... "On a related news, the total death toll for the autonomous land mowers incident now reach 353 after the failure of the western containment wall..."

A similar day zero vulnerability with numbers past 4 is why original unpatched I Ching Calculators displayed all such results as "A suffusion of yellow"