Post

I've tried Qwen out of curiosity. The first thing you learn is about asking complete questions. A friend is using AI to help answer the question "did this student complete his or her own homework or likely cheat?" AI has a potential valuable future we are only beginning to realize.

AI, like most technology can be useful, but only after kids have actually learned how to do things like read, write, compose and work with numbers. That may make it less profitable, but it will keep us from becoming mindless drones.

“We asked this technologist if AI could replace doctors. After all, many people use WebMD, and some doctors do too, and the person selling the AI replacement had a company that is worth a lot of money, so…”

#ELIMINATEmostAI #REGULATEallAI #HOLDtechbrosAccountable for massive data THEFT!! they need to PAY UP or SHUT DOWN! AI is SLOPPY and was created in an unethical and immoral manner!! AI can be manipulated and, frankly, we cannot trust Big Tech! they are NOT our friends!!

Once again I ask: did anyone of these ppl sit w their young children as they tried to “zoom school” during the pandemic? Did anyone notice the educational outcomes, well-tracked and discussed, after that year?

I’m tired of pretending that tech bros know anything, that because a person is good at coding or building an app or running a fucking ADVERTISING business means they’re a sociologist or a political scientist or a biologist is insane. This man is no prophet, he’s trying to sell you something.

Studies show that using ai decreases our ability to think and reason for ourselves. That seems contrary to the goals of schooling, no? I've seen the articles on these studies on npr, so they know better than to boost this crap.

Social media, which lacks human interaction, has already proven to be bad for youth. Virtual avatars won't be any better. Children. Need human interaction.

"Technologist" is just the bro version of "nutritionist". Neither word actually means anything, it's not a role with any scientific basis or academic rigour, and is just a fancy way for grifters to insist everyone should listen to what they reckon about stuff.

I mean, this is hardly an impartial source of information. This is no different than the CEO of Coca-Cola saying "One day, I think people will only drink soda, and the idea of water will seem hopelessly old-fashioned."

I see a future where our children are piloted by a team of hyper intelligent ants, like a sort of Ratatouille situation but with, just, like, billions and billions of ants. Where's my puff piece?

He is a bullshit artist making money of knowing nothing and you are going along with this nonsense. Nothing good is coming from this “revolution”. No increased creativity, no better human development, just slavish submission to technology serving rich people getting richer.

Can we stop pretending that dudes like these are anything remotely competent and that the entirety of their jobs is to just say whatever fake shit their raisin brains can steal from mediocre science fiction to balloon stock prices and bait investors????

who is forcing Ai everywhere? how will schools afford Ai services? even if kids type or talk into a prompt, they need to know how to write their ABCs and type their QWERTYs. imagine a class of kids shouting over each other at devices. "class, please take turns talking to your Aivatars"

HI, flesh and blood teacher here... Everything this guy said is wrong. He clearly knows nothing about how the learner learns. That's probably because he has no actual training or knowledge about pedagogy. Platforming someone like this (a CEO of an AI company) can do real harm. You need to do better.

These dudes always think every job but their own is thoughtless, menial nothing-work that a fancy calculator could do better than a person. I've seen the answers that AI produces for my students for their work. They're not good! And the students don't learn from it at all! Stop!

And I see a future where NPR reporters are replaced with AI voice bots who just read scripts prepared by AI script writers. See how easy that is, to just make stuff up that’s offensive to a whole profession?

Learning companions can be a useful tool for content, data and information research, but they have nothing to teach about life, soft skills, social rules and culture. For those who believe the learning experience is about memorising data, think again....

People are being moronic to allow experimentation with kids at scale. The truth is that whatever future Victor might "see", it's a story he's telling himself about what might happen. Victor could be full of it. Maybe we should find out first before affecting a whole generation.

Who controls the AI avatars. Am I getting old because I think this is just wrong? Surely reading and writing are essential skills for a healthy thinking independent mind. We are all different.

I heard this on the radio. The guy is basically arguing for an illiteracy curriculum, where schoolkids are encouraged to have conversations with robots instead of learning to read, write, and interact with people.

Writing is a tremendously valuable pedagogical tool — it requires students to organize their thoughts and transform them into coherent ideas and arguments. Per Richard Guindon, "writing is Nature's way of letting you know how sloppy your thinking is."

Ooh, I really like that quote, thanks. There was a study showing something along these lines that was discussed on WBUR recently too. arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872

arxiv.orgYour Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing TaskThis study explores the neural and behavioral consequences of LLM-assisted essay writing. Participants were divided into three groups: LLM, Search Engine, and Brain-only (no tools). Each completed three sessions under the same condition. In a fourth session, LLM users were reassigned to Brain-only group (LLM-to-Brain), and Brain-only users were reassigned to LLM condition (Brain-to-LLM). A total of 54 participants took part in Sessions 1-3, with 18 completing session 4. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to assess cognitive load during essay writing, and analyzed essays using NLP, as well as scoring essays with the help from human teachers and an AI judge. Across groups, NERs, n-gram patterns, and topic ontology showed within-group homogeneity. EEG revealed significant differences in brain connectivity: Brain-only participants exhibited the strongest, most distributed networks; Search Engine users showed moderate engagement; and LLM users displayed the weakest connectivity. Cognitive activity scaled down in relation to external tool use. In session 4, LLM-to-Brain participants showed reduced alpha and beta connectivity, indicating under-engagement. Brain-to-LLM users exhibited higher memory recall and activation of occipito-parietal and prefrontal areas, similar to Search Engine users. Self-reported ownership of essays was the lowest in the LLM group and the highest in the Brain-only group. LLM users also struggled to accurately quote their own work. While LLMs offer immediate convenience, our findings highlight potential cognitive costs. Over four months, LLM users consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels. These results raise concerns about the long-term educational implications of LLM reliance and underscore the need for deeper inquiry into AI's role in learning.

Riparbelli is making the common mistake of getting a new tool and throwing out the rest. The more tools you have, the better. Not every problem is a nail. AIs will always need human oversight because they aren't conscious, let alone gods.

Let’s add “children” to the long list of things TechBros do not understand (along with “how people learn,” “the importance of social interaction,” “the social contract,” “democracy” …). Using AI requires understanding AI which requires critical thinking. Do it the other way around… 😬

things.techthings.tech