Post

1.99 Final 2 revised.

I vote for 1.100 for the funnies and also because you could reserve 2.0 for a genuine platform-altering change (like private states for example?)

I like it, thinking out of the box!

honestly i would be weirded out if you didn't go with 1.100

Any chance you can reinstate @cocofoto.bsky.social first? Nearly four weeks now since I raised this issue.

1.9900001

1.1001, then

1.100 is funny you should totally do it

The bit where you can’t edit posts? :-)

out-of-line tags

Do a 2.0 release with no changes on a Friday night, things will break for you

make a new feed that bricks your device

Defer the decision for a bit, go with 1.98.001

Breaking change xkcd.com/1172/

Can you change the timeline so when you come back to the app, it's at the last post you were viewing rather than the latest post. It's the one feature of that other place I miss.

2.0 patch notes Added : Racism

Paulinho pls

Wait, but you're breaking the app all the time 🤔

posting

Just tweak the CSS to make everything dark mode and call it 2.0.

Break replies so that I can’t talk anymore 🙏🏻

You're going to piss off python devs with a v 1.100

Yeah but that would be cringe

gif support

No 2.0 until group chats. No group chats until 2.01 due to initial bug

Remove support for English.

The part that lets AI generated images proliferate.

1.100 seems a bit Y2K....

Silently truncate all inputs to 26 characters and store them all as strings pointing to shelves in the Library of Babel.

If you want to break people's mind, put an edit button that doesn't do anything. Now, if you do that, I'd suggest going on a vacation where there's no way to reach you.🤣

All posted content is now base64 encoded. Don't worry the AIs can still read it.

DMs? (please dont break DMs)

Blocking @jcsalterego.bsky.social once and for all

Introduce Group DMs & allow image and video upload in the DMs. Massive change and would bring over a bunch of OSINT guys who still hesitate to use Bluesky for this exact reason.

breakfast

Edit

Can we get a Clippy AI assistant? @microsoft.com

Does SemVer allow for 1.0100?

Edit post for free, if you see what i mean 😏

Add webhooks 🤠

Good reason to introduce a breaking change

Break the versioning instead and switch to calver

Break the part that forces me to drill 8 clicks down just to add an image, then promptly forgets where it just looked one post ago. Kudos for not grabbing the first image and running with it, forcing you to go back for more images, like a *certain* unnamed site. But surely you can top 4.🤔 [==*==]

The app still crashes on my Sony after Android 15 :(

Change default colors from blue to green

Break it so alt text is required by default.

Ban the word Musk

How about version numbering

make it so that a random amount of people end up having their display name changed to bob and have it happen repeatedly for 2 days

Please listen to Mr Semver.

apologies mr semver i was not familiar with your game

Your page says bad takes and animal pictures.

And then suddenly your whole continuous integration pipeline comes crashing down..

You can and should do 1.100. That is more correct than 2.0. You presumably did 1.1 and 1.10, so adding another zero doesn’t change the correctness.

of course you can? the numbers go as high as numbers go

Go right to 3.0, you legend.

My brother, y'all can and should do whatever you want with your version numbers. Chromium is on version 753 or whatever now, and at the rate they go, it'll be like 1035 by the end of the month, and nobody says shit to them about it.

This is exactly I prefer year-month versioning.

lmao 🤨🤨🥸

😆

Do 1.100. It’s liberating. In two weeks you’ll wonder why you thought you shouldn’t.

Such an Elon post.

And that's why we love you.

1.991

You've already gone from .9 to .10 at some point so there's no sense pretending you aren't perfectly willing to go against the way decimals work.

If you don't do 1.420.69 you ain't doing semver right

Yes. That skips 891 perfectly good version numbers.

Never install a dot aught version of software.

1.100 all of the way. It's how Semver would've wanted it.

folks at work simply refuse to go over version 4.3 in our scripts package. no matter the level of modification. we're on 4.3r. it's been 4.3 for almost 10 years

1.991

Surprise everyone by skipping a few numbers and going into 4-digit minor version number territory.

I break the number into <level>.<version>, where <version> is for minor changes and fixes, while <level> represents fundamental enhancements that introduce entirely new functionality, appearance, and/or changes to operability. By my estimation, you should already be closer to 5.1 than 2.0. [==*==]

If you can do 1.10 you can do 1.100 😉

Seems pretty obvious anything else would be so off brand it wouldn't make it through marketing sign off.