Post

I wrote the latest cover story for The Atlantic. It's about the far-ranging implications of one simple statistic: Americans have never spent so much time alone, and surging solitude is warping our society. I'm really proud of it, and I hope you read it. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc...

221 reposts884 likes

Excellent piece. I'm a retired, widowed Boomer, plenty reason to experience long periods of solitude - which I'd like to reverse. I'm always reminded of something Howard Stern said on his show years ago, back in his terrestrial days, "Whenever I go out I fantasize about being home watching TV."

Stats don’t lie, people who use them do. If just +1% of the population started working from home 8 hours a day between 03 and 23 that would mean the “average person” spends +5 minutes at home. Turns out ~14% of the US population works from home now. What % do you think worked from home in 03?

Given that in 03 we had AIM, Teamspeak, and limewire…. And that we now have multiple multibillion dollar companies whose entire profit model is built on enabling telepresences…. It’s childish to point at that “99 minutes” and claim it’s meaningful. Care to cite that source at all?

(The more I read, the more confident I am that you are related to someone high up at the Atlantic) “If the level of drug related deaths had remained flat…” Yep. And if my grandmother had wheels, she’d be a bicycle. Any other “genius” insights for us?

Neededness was a great insight,there is a lot to that. Friends,in their 60s,that HATE cash,hate shopping in stores.Then stores have no product.Its a vicious loop towards disconnection,which requires a bit more inconvenience,which humans seem to be strongly against.They just want to get back to TV.

Derek this is what out of touch looks like, you big weirdo bsky.app/profile/bmig...

Brooke Migdon@bmigdon.bsky.social

News: House and Senate Republicans refiled legislation to bar transgender girls from girls' sports. The House passed a similar bill last year, but the Senate didn't take it up. That likely won't be the case this time, with Rs controlling both chambers. thehill.com/homenews/lgb...

There’s some good stuff in there, but the lawn sign bit was really dumb. If someone has a Harris lawn sign it means they support Harris. It doesn’t mean they aren’t aware that Trump voters exist. You’d never describe 2020 Trump voters as “out of touch”, would you? Spoiled an otherwise decent article

It’s the same tedious shtick where the world’s richest man and a former president aren’t “elites” but random public school teachers and college students are

The replies have latched onto a single section buried in the center of your far-reaching story. I found the piece profound, and I'll be thinking (and worried) about it for some time. Thank you for this work, Derek. You *should* be proud.

So WHY is the demand from the boot lockers to power ALWAYS that the left side needs to cowtow to the right in the rights efforts to destroy anything decent about our society? It NEVER goes the other way. Never.

Yes, he did, it's in a long section in the middle of this long article called "This Is Your Politics on Solitude". You may disagree with some, or all, of his conclusions, or think he goes easy on the MAGAs, but he certainly didn't ignore the topic.

Good column. I consider myself pretty introverted and should question the idea that i was destined to be this way. It would be interesting to see how time alone changed among self described intro- vs extroverts since 2010

Putting up a sign is about MY values and who I support, not some weird statement on others. I know why people like Trump, I get told I must go out of my way to understand them each election. Why are they never told the same? Is it truly my problem if I had more faith in people?

But it's not "about the far-ranging implications of one simple statistic: Americans have never spent so much time alone". Instead it's another Jeffrey Goldberg appeasing piece to blame Democrats as though they somehow are unaware of how fascist America is. Pure propaganda. bsky.app/profile/dkth...

Derek Thompson@dkthomp.bsky.social

I wrote the latest cover story for The Atlantic. It's about the far-ranging implications of one simple statistic: Americans have never spent so much time alone, and surging solitude is warping our society. I'm really proud of it, and I hope you read it. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc...

I can tell you in two words why I avoided outings in the USA: Expensive and Guns. Also hostile to older people. As a US citizen, I moved to Mexico, made friends (with my limited Spanish) almost every weekend I'm out with one or more to hear music, lots of free entertainment here, good food & drink.

Great article; in ref to your opening I’d note in my neighborhood we have a restaurant with bar seating where I and others have made many friends with our neighbors. It’s been wonderful to live in a village — in this case the West Village of NYC! Knowing your neighbors does make a difference.

I don't know how it was in US but when I was old enough to work ie in the late 1960s workplaces were more sociable too, even if only company canteens, or going out together for food. Many now skip meals or eat at their desk. Companies discourage breaks so no real chance to get to know colleagues

If you're proud of that dogshit, you're dumber than we thought. Trump's vote in 2024 was less than 4% higher than it was in 2020. Characterizing that as a great swell in support is laughable. Crucially, only 63.88% of eligible voters participated. Trump's votes comprised 31.6% of eligible voters.

Great piece by Derek Thompson: "In 1970, just 6 percent of sixth graders had a TV set in their bedroom; in 1999, that proportion had grown to 77 percent..." Walking home today I was struck by toddlers in strollers not taking in the world around them. Almost all looked at screens in their hands.

You are projecting your own bubble of generic hack smug punditry and would never dream of directing the same argument against the party that had lost an unprecedented 7/8 Presidential popular votes.

I’ll read it. I’m a big believer that our society is being dismantled by social media. It may in the surface seem that we are all more “connected” via the internet but in reality it seems as if we’ve become more isolated and alone.

This also has financial implications — social isolation fundamentally changes spending patterns, investment decisions, and risk tolerance. When we lack regular social contact, we tend to make financial decisions in an echo chamber of our own biases.

Great article. I've been concerned about the isolation our technology creates and it's effect on communities for quite some time. Even bought another copy of "Bowling Alone" about a year ago with the intent of reading it again but it's still in my stack.

Fabulous, thought-provoking piece (and frankly if the replies are any indication of what discourse on Bluesky is like, yikes!). I did have a question, tho. Is there any socialization data by geography? Presumable urban dwellers are far more social but there must be an interesting threshold there.

Derek, I am a Black American cis woman. I COMPLETELY understand the appeal of a man who says Mexico is sending rapists and drug dealers and not their best people and who repeatedly insults the intelligence of Black women and who called majority non-white countries shit hole countries and rubs elbows

with straight up neo-nazis. Trump's appeal confirms what I ALREADY thought about who the U.S. is despite repeated claims of "That's not who we are." My lawn sign was to advertise that I'm not in agreement with it. The "obviously" isn't that Harris/Waltz was the obvious choice to MOST. It was

that Harris/Waltz was the obvious choice "In THIS house". Not in my window but on a lot of lawns the Harris/Waltz sign literally was in the grass next to the "In THIS House" sign or in the lawn while a rainbow flag flew from the porch. Your take is bad.

this article is so good. sure, i read it on my phone with my office door closed while eating lunch in solitude. but idk maybe i'll leave my door open tomorrow

Sure, you may have decided that a candidate who isn't a convicted felon and didn't try to overthrow an elected government is the obvious choice, but have you run that past your neighbors? Did you get their permission? Did you get it in a diner, did you get it at a movie, in a box, with a fox? wild

A majority of Americans have chosen to disengage entirely while a small but very vocal minority has convinced tools like you that THEIR view is a majority view and the OTHER political minority is the one out of touch with the disaffected majority. And you're proud of this dreck you spewed WHY?

I am done with being told “elites” didn’t pay attention. The fuck we didn’t. Maybe “elites” now means people with principles, ethics, reading comprehension past the 6th grade. Fuck this noise. That stupid naked emperor and his posse of Robber Barrons hijacked this election. I said it; I stand by it

Furthermore, let’s talk about gerrymandering. Let’s talk about election inference. Let’s talk about nepotism and all the nefarious shit the GOP blathered about the Bidens being guilty of which we know was projection and every damn castigation was an admission

Stop the steal??? Stop the fucking insanity. Goddamnit. We- every screaming liberal, every angry progressive, every outraged former Republican- were right. About everything. Fuck you Atlantic; I lined my cat box with the last issue I received and canceled my sub last year.

Well done on the piece. I would’ve loved to hear more about how people’s income, and the ever-decreasing number of public places that don’t cost money (or require a purchase), play into these trends - especially given how folks w/ money are the noticeable outlier in this chart:

Lots of factors. Some others: - Tickets for sports are $ out of reach for most folks, though they used to be affordable -Public spaces transformed into PPPs (Public Private Partnerships) - disappearance of malls since the 80s Etc

I go to (progressive LGBT loving) church, and once a week we have a coworking/hangout day, where you can just sit and do whatever and drink coffee, read, sometimes a dog comes along, work,etc, not religious at all. Trying to create one of those spaces. It's such a great idea.

I wouldn’t be proud of this to be honest. The craft isn’t great; your prose is a deep maroon at best, your argument is “correlation does mean causation, actually”, and you feel the need to shill for AI despite waxing nostalgic about a era without tech where we hung out more. But more importantly…

More importantly you get today’s politics completely wrong. And don’t think I didn’t notice you only spend one paragraph on it as engagement bait. The vast majority of the piece isn’t about that but you’ve got an irresistibly wrong paragraph for folks to pull out. Hell, that’s how I found it.

But I digress. The core of MAGA is built around grievance. It is the center of Trump’s being and he is the center of the party. However, his grievances aren’t about how to run a PTA meeting. They’re about denying the humanity of others. About punishing those who are different. Vengeance.

You ignore this by suggesting that aloneness made Democrats misunderstand their neighbor, as if they are the ones being anti-social and not MAGA? What is more antisocial politics than threatening to annex your neighbor? Did that even occur to you once when you wrote this?

Very nice piece, Derek, with some very good facts about American culture. Perhaps we haven't adapted well to rapid change. We spend more time confirming our beliefs than examining their weaknesses. Social media magnifies that. How much time did you spend exploring what you might have got wrong?

Just because more people went Nazi than I would like, does not make me out of touch for thinking that the choice in 2024 was actually obvious. Voters got it wrong, not for the first (or last) time.

Really fine article. You Should be proud! I'm appalled by the many churlish comments here. That your piece triggered so much vitriol is a sad reflection of these perilous times. No opportunity lost to bash. I suspect most of these soreheads were too busy grinding their axes to read your piece.

Derek- You really shouldn’t be proud. You make assumptions about nearly half the electorate that just aren’t true. Lazy and insulting

I can’t believe you’re proud of this garbage. You’re like a three-year-old that walks out of the bathroom holding a pile of shit that you think is the Hope diamond Please, find another line of work. If you stay a writer, maybe have someone else critique your drivel before publishing it

Everybody I talked to or followed in politics knew this was going to be a close election. Blame your own bubble or, even better, the MAGA idiots that think the last election was stolen or think Trump will lower the price of eggs.

Great. Next month when the fascists you so wholeheartedly support start their rampage I’ll look forward to your endless blathering about how it’s our fault. You’re a tool, you’ve always been a tool, and you’ll always be one You fucking tool.

I wouldn't be, starting off with the fact that quoting a misogynist like Richard Reeves is offensive. Women are dying from abortion bans, millions voted for a rapist to be President, & numerous sexual abusers have been nominated to Trump's cabinet. Miss me with lectures about 'male loneliness'.

I looked up Richard Reeves and while he seems focused on male issues, what's wrong with having a specialty. I probably missed something, but I'd like to know. At any rate the brunt of the article is about people being isolated not men per se. I myself see the problem as internet and phone addiction.

We liberals understand MAGA perfectly well. They are not moral people. The best assessment of Trumpers was written by Adam Serwer in 2018 and neither you nor anyone else has improved upon it.

Strongly disagree with your assessment of the election: "Too many progressives were mainlining left-wing media in the privacy of their home, oblivious that families down the street were drifting right." No, progressives knew neighbors were fucked in the head, so they were lost causes. 1)

Didn't you get the memo? MAGA is all about getting factual information from the widest possible array of reputable news, information, medical and scientific sources. They definitely haven't been mainlining a stream of deliberate misinformation from cable news, internet sites and podcasts for years.

Seriously. It'd been hours and the breadcrumbs in this piece remain vexing. Didn't dems already try to court republican voters over their own base? How to did that work out, huh? We find out in *checks watch* 12 days!

I'm thinking about this more as I reflect on Thompson harping on American television consumption. His failure to tie the MAGAfacation the lonely directly into the "othering" propaganda that is Fox News and the election is profound editorial negligence.

2) "If progressives still consider MAGA an alien movement, it is in part because they have made themselves strangers in their own land." Certainly not alien, but yes, strangers, but that's how it has ALWAYS been, especially if you're BIOPC. The main crux of MAGA *is the racism*.

3) As publications and editors are being pushed to treat MAGA with kid gloves, you'll never be able to print "Yes, the majority of America is racist." Even if shouts to SECURE THE BORDER echo as an American drives a pickup truck through NO and shoots AMERICANS, because XENOPHOBIA.

4) “I’d like to see the gov. build social infrastructure for teens with the creativity and generosity with which video game companies build [to] keep them inside. I’m thinking of athletic fields, public swimming pools, and libraries with beautiful social areas for young people to hang out together.”

Haven’t read it don’t know if there’s a pay wall But the sophistication of TV streaming and internet in making people isolate but still communicate has been devastating Wal Mart and I phones directly resulted in the level of racism and stupidity that enabled magat to con the rubes

Do you honestly think that someone putting up a lawn sign that says "HARRIS WALZ: OBVIOUSLY" is putting it up as a statement that a majority of voters will "obviously" vote for Harris / Walz?

Here's a lawn sign from 2020. Given that a majority of voters in 2020 apparently disagreed that Trump / Pence would "Keep America Great", would you say that this sign represented a "failure to engage in the world as it really is"?

I skimmed through the article and, political sentiment aside, I'm here to say that ppl watch movies at home for several reasons - it's cheaper. Like $15/mo vs $40/movie for two ppl kind of cheaper - you cannot catch the flu at home - a movie theater isn't going to pause the movie while I go pee

Considering the possibility of more looming pandemics--especially in an age when anti-vaccine propaganda is spreading...well, this "good thing" could delay pandemics. And enjoying solitude is not bad. But kids are killing themselves out of loneliness.

He doesn't seem to be endorsing Trump. He does buy into the bs about Democrats "not getting" troubled Americans. That wasn't the problem. Trump was ready to use the linguistic WMDs --LIES--and Democrats weren't.

Why is it a "stubborn inability to understand Trump's appeal" and not a sincere rejection of what we judge to be unacceptable? Almost everyone in my family is a Trump supporter. I'm not isolated from them. I know why they support him. I think they lack judgment and are willfully misinformed.

When a democrat becomes isolated it’s because of their “stubborn inability to understand Trump’s appeal” but when a MAGA becomes isolated it’s because Dems did something to cause that isolation. It’s like MAGA is the baby of the family who can do no wrong, only have wrong done to them

There's a huge difference between saying we need to figure out how to address the issues that led to this, and saying that anyone who finds Trump/MAGA unfit and abhorrent just stubbornly refuses to understand. I don't refuse to understand, I refuse to pretend it's acceptable.

He calls Trumpism a "grotesque style of politics" right above the quoted paragraph? The article is about understanding the appeal so we can properly address people's needs, not about moralizing.

Great article. Goes hand in hand with your discussions with Marc Schulz and Waldinger on Plain English discussing their "secret to a good life" being social connections. Hard not to become even *more* radicalized against phone usage and algorithmic social media content after reading this though

Thoughtful piece! Something I'd like to see addressed, maybe in a future piece, is the question: how much of this increased alone time in the aftermath of the pandemic is related to inflation? Maybe people feel going out is an indulgence they can't afford, and/or have sticker shock