Post

Here's the thing: there is no going back to a different era of Twitter. This doesn't replace it, Threads doesn't replace it, Twitter doesn't replace it. That era is dead, no return, it was a very fun 5-10 year window or so that dragged on past its prime until it dropped off a cliff.

Charlie Warzel@cwarzel.bsky.social

maybe im doing it wrong but i feel like the various crises of 2026 have revealed the limitations of this platform for me. twitter was always invaluable to me in chaotic times bc you had a lot of subj matter expert weirdos coming out of the woodwork. just dont feel like there's a much of that here rn

269 reposts1.8K likes

We need to factor in we as society changed. Everyone is trying to do whatever it takes to make money. Social media now incentivizes division in the form of payment for interaction. People are becoming extreme and farther right because that is where the controversial and problematic opinions are.

I noticed it coming from there to here. The Nazi-esque crap and Grok nonsense is gone. But so many of the posts are the same form of nonsense. I had hoped it would be more of a talking about stuff place and not the same “I must put my political opinion bat signal into the sky for every post!”

Like … can we not? I mean today, can we just make Chuck Norris didn’t die, death Chuck Norrised posts instead of always circling back to the political obsession? You can be miserable for all of four years or choose to not dwell on the misery 24/7/365, ya know.

I understand what you mean not wanting to deal with politics, but tbh you’re on a website filled with people (and bots depending if you believe dead internet theory). Politics affects more and more people everyday. At this point if you can afford to not pay attention that’s a privilege.

Threads, more or less, has replaced Twitter for me. It has the real time news, funny accounts, & social connections that Twitter had before fuckface ruined everything. They're just slow to add necessary features. Not Bluesky slow, but still...

This is what people need to realize. Same deal with the legacy media, and with the entertainment oligopoly. The old world is dead or dying. You can't get it back by staying on twitter, watching cbs news, or subscribing to wapo. Mourn and move on, the only way out is through.

But Dan! Imagine being a reporter and having to work to find sources! You might have to, I dunno, DO REPORTING? Call people on the phone? Find sources outside of a social media search? THINK OF THE REPORTERS DAN.

And it TOTALLY had its own problems that people mostly forget about. It was Weimar social media. It was exuberantly propelling towards the entire system's decline

That doesn't really invalidate his point afaict; social media is far less reliable and encourages everyone to be far more malicious than it once did. It's reasonable to mourn that, and try to find something that replaces it with social cohesion we don't have now.

The death of small-s society isn't something to accept without a fight, anymore than cancer is. But it definitely takes prosocial design patterns to make a society that can both function *and* have an internet. It's worth a lot of trying. Early Twitter gave us a lot of lessons, good and bad.

The worst people ever are the ones who read up on how to peg the algorithm. I’ve said for at least a decade that relying on SM for news was insanity. It’s part of an even bigger problem of people expecting quality things for free and then lying to themselves that the worse yet free version is equal.

It's never coming back again, but I was just thinking about the long-dead era of Facebook where it kept me in touch with people in a low-stakes way. I hung out with a college friend in Hawaii because I posted that I was traveling & he said hi, I live here now, let's meet up! Similar in Italy.

I would have never called any of those folks, but it was genuinely delightful to meet up with them. Facebook used to actually facilitate IRL connections, give me a sense of what was going on in people's lives. So much of social media now is influencers & slop.

Not so much nostalgia, but when I think about bringing the best of that kind of thing into the current or future internet, it seems unlikely unless we can change the incentives of tech companies or figure out how to power more that's truly user-driven.

I don’t think there is no replacement of it. I think it took over a decade to build, and ppl want it rebuilt near instantaneously. It’s also OK if we never rebuild something like it, but it’s weird to me that ppl expected that so quickly in the first place.

99% of content written by 1% of users (a user base which was roughly 35% of the US in the US). If you identified with that content then great but it wasn’t for everyone. Never used it myself. Don’t deny Bluesky is smaller but do deny Twitter was as big as people think it was. Didn’t work for lots.

The thing is the *entire internet* is different now than it was a decade ago (and, largely, not for the better). All of this is interrelated and there's no going *backwards* only forward. So work for a better future, don't angle for a return to an idealized past.

A typical thing on my local one is for someone to say "Remember what used to be here?" then others remember about six different things. Many of them "remember" things that have not been there since before they were born.

"I would like the things that currently exist to be more like I remember them being when I was younger and funner" is basically the entire Boomer cultural hegemony in a nutshell so I'd prefer not to repeat that series of mistakes ever. Nostalgia is a cop, all cops are bastards.

I'd like SOME things to go back to the way they were before Trump's ride down that escalator, when we had a semi-functioning democracy that needed a lot of work. But I was 20 when the Vietnam War ended. If you think I'm happy that he's returning us to those days, you're crazier than he is.

It’s been dead and buried so long, I’ve been on the other side of all the stages of grief to the point that I now only occasionally think about the place where I met the people who launched my career and my entire professional community.

It’s kinda like saying something about north Brooklyn in 2026 if you lived there in the late oughts. Like sure it physically still exists in the same place but it’s a fundamentally different thing now.

I think that this has a lot to do w/ who you follow and when you got here. I feel like the info in my feed is informative and legit, for the most part, and that I don't long for the days where I blindly trusted, checking out sources has to be a thing cultivating your feed is essential, is my point

Yes. There has been a huge, unreported exodus of government folks from X to LinkedIn, past and present. The quality of the shares & conversations is underappreciated & underreported; many people tell me they find my work there because it’s the only social media they use. Dismissing it is foolish.

This is the start of an essay about techno-conservatism (lowercase c) that neither of us has time to write. The web has been around long enough for a growing contingent to miss multiple eras of “the old days.”

yeah I happen to think this place is decent as 2026 social media goes but you cannot step into the same river twice and certainly not if that river is from 2014

Truth. When I get nostalgic for Twitter *then*, I remember that *then* itself was just so different. Musk killed whatever remnant was left, but the era was gone even before that.

A colleague wrote a very good article on a topic he has expertise in and published in a good spot. Despite not being particularly controversial he and his family have received threats. That’s a good reason for a lot of great subject matter experts not to bother or to actively avoid engaging. Sucks.

I want out of the news business. I don’t care about it anymore. You get to continually see it get worse for something barely anyone cares about enough upon which to spend money. So few care about expertise and trust when they can get “ooh that person wrote a sentence I fully agreed with MORE!”

“Independent journalism” as some replacement is just silly. You’re not going to find someone on Substack successfully covering your local court system. The people who succeed there cover what will peg the ol’ algorithms. You will get politics, sports and super niche channels.

brb inventing time travel so i can go back to the night ellen took a selfie at the oscars, forever, i guess

My version of this is that it somehow hit the sweet spot of scale, diversity of thought (or interest, or expertise), guardrails and user experience to work across multiple use cases. X lost at least three of those post-Elmo, Bluesky and Threads struggle on a couple as well.

Jeff Tweedy played Black Eyed Peas at the book party?! (I have the book). I have gone back down the rabbit hole and its a spot of joy in these dark times. Your gift keeps on giving.

Jeff Tweedy is the best showman in concerts at theatre venues. His interactions with the crowd are funny and enjoyable. He picks the best venues to perform, here in Los Angeles. I love him.

yeah i think about this when people will talk about annoying replies here and it's just like, yeah i think that you just can't have a widely used social media platform that doesn't lead to being annoyed a lot anymore!

I literally didn't use Twitter, like at all, because I thought the replies were so annoying. All throughout my 20s, I used Reddit, which is also annoying! Nostalgia-tinted glasses blind us to the most obvious of facts.

I’m not sure why so many people think we all must bury our face into the scratchy pillow of politics with every post. Does anyone enjoy that in real life? I get way more video game stuff than I care for, but at least these people kinda sorta touch grass.

I agree with this, but also refuse to believe people don’t want a place where ideas get shared widely. It’s easy to look at the landscape and forget that the reason it sucks is because of some truly terrible business decisions / bad intentions. Dunno if this is the place, but not giving up hope

Sure, hence the ascent of TikTok & Reels. Unfortunately tapping little thoughts into a little box isn't where that's happening anymore. There's a reason this site's average age is nearly 40.

As one of the, I've come to realize very few, very early 20s user on this site, this is spot on. Hell, I'm yet to meet anyone here that's younger than me. I think another factor is that sites that have an older demographic lean tend to get youth flight, which is very much the case with bsky.

Why? Because of something I can only describe as perceived uncoolness, mostly made of: Lack of a shared generational sense of humor, lack of content regarding interests, and in the case of bsky, most people either don't know about it or has a rep for being home to the most annoying breed of leftist.