Post

I have to assume Substack is throwing some fat stacks of cash at prominent authors to launch on the platform in 2026, in exchange for ignoring the fact the company openly embrace nazis and white supremacists for engagement

230 reposts844 likes

launching a substack in 2026 sends several messages, none of them good 1. you're not politically attentive enough to know the company is run by white supremacist coddling assholes 2. you know the company is run by white supremacist coddling assholes and don't care 3. you're getting paid, see #2.

karlbode.comSubstack Still Has A Nazi Problem (And Doesn't Care)For several years Substack has been accused of coddling white supremacy and fascist ideology for cash. And despite several major scandals and a mass defection of ethical authors, there's little seriou...

I would love it if some reporters with connections and scoop chops (@marisakabas.bsky.social ?) could find out what the cash/agreements are for new prominent authors on substack in 2026, I think it would make for interesting reading for us all

Klein is bright and politically attentive. She knows Substack has been caught repeatedly boosting white supremacist, fascist, and anti-trans content for engagement like zeteo (which she's a contributor to) I have to think there's some financial motivation here to memory hole that stuff

You could switch to Steady (@steady.page). We offer a GDPR-compliant recurring payment platform based in Berlin for your supporters, including a free newsletter and a great community

Stupid question but does Substack have a good competitor / alternative other than just a straight up website? I created a substack like 8 years ago and just literally never used it. I’m going to delete it but I’m curious what else is out there.

I know people on here who’ve set up on Ghost and found it pretty good (and less expensive). I think they have tools for migrating from Substack, too.

Yeah, it's kind of a bummer when you'd like to throw a few dollars at an author you really admire, butya can't because theyre writing on the Nazi-supporting platform.

It's so confusing. I thought she was the halfway sensible one. I'll just have to take a 'Both Naomi's bad' approach. At least then I don't have to remember which is which.

There are a staggering number of otherwise 'progressive' people who are continuing to use, or start using, Substack despite their history. I can only assume that it's just not as well known about for those who aren't chronically online. Might do a poll...

yep. this is another case where many Western democracies should be throwing some funding to Ghost and Beehiiv to build competing, pro-democracy platforms that are just as easy to use (100 years ago, radio, BBC, NPR public funding etc etc)

Reminds me of whe I see a Tesla in 2026 with a new temp tag, what an asshole. They know who they are supporting. There are alternatives. I never would have guessed how many people would embrace fascists and nazis in the 2020s with open arms.

As someone struggling to make indie journalism sustainable, I'll be honest: I've thought about whether I should have done Substack instead of Ghost. But every time I grow weak I then see a story about how Substack just hosted a book release party for, like, a Nazi who thinks germs are fake.

weaker social outreach tools but you have a lot more control over your own data and lists, it works great, and it doesn't overtly support nazis, which I think is nice

Yeah, the network effect that Substack (theoretically) provides is pretty critical for the shift from curated news to news influencers. Another platform I like is MailerLite, which is essentially a much leaner version of Mailchimp. The most ridiculous platform to use for community engagement.

I agree -- outside of a few hiccups, it's definitely a nicer experience than trying to write on Substack. But I do get FOMO when it comes to discoverability. I feel like success there is more dependent on already having a large following elsewhere, and that their Mastodon instance doesn't cut it.

this bit exactly. the rapid iteration of twitter-like features to woo people over from x dot com really felt like a game-changer--but their game got changed to a substack walled garden where everyone's just notes-ing at each other and nobody's reading posts. their audience, not yours

They had a previous program years ago (Mike Tracey god a big payout), but IIRC they haven't been clear about what newer programs entail or if there's any contract non disparagement clauses

To be honest: as I mull my writing future (or even the possible lack thereof) in my dotage, I consider Substack for unlisted reason 4: It's easy to set up and use. While I'm technically adept enough to set up on another platform, Substack is the path of least resistance. But the Nazis keep me away.

And I suspect that's why a lot of others use it, despited the presence of True Evil™. On the other hand, True Evil™ is also everywhere, in all nooks/crannies of the internet.

Molly White@molly.wiki

Here’s some napkin math for how expensive Substack is compared to its competitors, assuming that roughly 7% of all subscribers will pay for their subscriptions, and that subscriptions cost $5/month.

Can we get more examples of what they’re doing to coddle the Nazi fvcks? I don’t think that people are going to necessarily just make a decision that I’m not gonna do Substack anymore because so and so said that they’re coddling Nazis. Can we compile the facts to show people why?