Post

Amazingly, reaction times using screens while driving are worse than being drunk or high—no wonder 90 percent of drivers hate using touchscreens in cars. Finally the auto industry is coming to its senses. Real buttons are sooooooo back baby!

wired.comRejoice! Carmakers Are Embracing Physical Buttons AgainAmazingly, reaction times using screens while driving are worse than being drunk or high—no wonder 90 percent of drivers hate using touchscreens in cars. Finally the auto industry is coming to its sen...

1.4K reposts7K likes

Let's take a closer look: This chart shows the percentage increase in distracted drivers' response times. An undistracted driver typically reacts in 1 second. Now, compare the response of a drink drive limit to using in-car touch screens.

Even if the dashboard touchscreen is eliminated, people will have their smartphones and will continue to drive distracted. IMO, smartphones are the problem. You can see other drivers flying down the freeway staring at the phone in their hand.

Not all touch screens are created equal either. I've experienced varying brands and designs since 2008. My old 08 Lexus IS250 and my current Jeep Grand Cherokee are my favorite. They're large enough that I can quickly see the map, which is my main use. I use buttons or knobs for everything else.

WTF is "Using Cannabis". You're lighting a joint or taking a bong hit while driving? It's funny they put drinking at the limit cause everyone knows the drunks out there are driving on just 3 drinks.

“Almost every vehicle-maker has moved key controls onto central touchscreens, obliging drivers to take their eyes off the road and raising the risk of distraction crashes,” EuroNCAP tells WIRED. “Manufacturers are realizing that they’ve probably gone too far with [fitting touchscreens].” Thoughts?

wired.comRejoice! Carmakers Are Embracing Physical Buttons AgainAmazingly, reaction times using screens while driving are worse than being drunk or high—no wonder 90 percent of drivers hate using touchscreens in cars. Finally the auto industry is coming to its sen...

100%. And if you are on even remotely less than perfect surfacing, it's even worse. I hate the touchscreens. I'm not fond of Mercedes touch-pad either, but at least it's at the center console and you're not trying to reach to the center dash. Only slightly less awful. #buttonsknobsandswitchesohmy

In a way, I just want fewer things to control. The center console has so many integrated systems, most of which there's no real way to "opt out" of. I don't need to check the stock market while driving. Why is it so hard to find new models where that's not even possible?

It should be mandatory to have physical buttons for every frequently used feature (heating, AC, music, etc). And companies that pushed touchscreens should be fined retrospectively to pay for the increase of accident they caused.

Could not agree wit this more. Increase fan or temperature would be turning a knob I didn’t even have to look at and now takes two screens and multiple touches I have to at least glance over at. And why when my CarPlay starts does the car have to give me a warning and make me confirm every time

I won't be popular because I like touchscreens, since there are a lot of functions which is impossible (or impossibly convoluted) by buttons only. Also they're flexible, and comfortable. But I prefer to have physical buttons for functions fitting them, like switches and knobs. But not for map.

Thoughts? Haptics are good, anybody with half a brain already knew this, the people in charge of car companies are greedy idiots who should be put in jail for allowing this to get so far. The NHTSA is corrupt and needs to do their damn jobs. Unlikely under this corrupt administration though.

I prefer buttons to screens 100%. Backup camera, GPS, safety alerts - those are fine. But my A/C, radio, etc should be buttons, knobs, dials, maybe even a couple cranks… Whatever happened to those great temp/fan sliders from the 80’s. I want those back.

I like my Hyundai. Buttons on the console, buttons on the steering wheel, and touchscreen when I want it. Best of both worlds. As someone who drives for a living, I use the touchscreen a lot- just not much while in motion.

Why are they better? It actually takes longer to say what you want than to touch a button / turn a knob. And actually takes more brain activation. And who else in the car needs to hear "raise cruise control speed setting to 85"?

Tesla touchscreen confusion has killed several in the US already. The US Navy has had at least 2 ship collisions. Of course they blamed poor kids at the helm, though NTSB blamed controls. But at least they started switching back to physical throttles. www.someweekendreading.blog/tesla-unsafe...

someweekendreading.blogTesla vs Safety EngineeringYesterday came news of the unfortunate death of a driver in a Tesla which backed into a pond, whereupon the power cut making the doors unable to open and the windows essentially unbreakable. How many...

Excellent. Next make cars w/out GPS allowing your location/speed to be tracked by manufacturers, law enforcement, insurance companies, etc I just want an ANALOG sports car with 2 doors, 3 pedals, and no computers except the engine management ECU. It's why I stick to cars from the 00's and earlier

Thank God! When I needed a car I deliberately got a nice used one without the stupid screen. If you shouldn't use your phone while driving what geniuses thought it was fine to need those?? SMDH

Touch screen response is the worst. I click to turn on or off the AC, and wait like 10 seconds for it to respond. If I'm not thinking, I end up clicking it multiple times, which gets unpredicatable results.

You don't have to look away from the road to turn air conditioning nob or find your window button. Finding functions on screens is very distracting. I'm glad car makers are finally realizing that & not choosing flash over substance.

Probably. But in my truck (a 2025 RAM) the voice controls are decent, but it takes a while to learn the exact words to use for various commands. It can be much like talking to a computer at a call center, and is just as frustrating. …

I'd also love to hear why hands free driving is allowed to be offered as an option. If your hands aren't on the wheel, what are your hands, and eyes, doing? It's literally an "anti- safety" device.

The control button on the center console that allows you to do everything while your right arm is in the armrest position should be standardized and a regulatory requirement.

I’ve always found it flabbergasting that car makers ever thought touch screens where a good replacement for real buttons in cars except for the most benign interactions like changing the radio channel or something…

Not even that; they should only be used to change settings that won't be interacted with while driving. Connecting your phone to Bluetooth, enabling/disabling certain luxury features, setting presets, things like that.

This is a case where automakers could learn from military aircraft designers - especially with fighter jets. They’ve got decades of experience in designing cockpits for human factors, minimizing head-down time, reaction time, etc.

Touchscreens are great for functions that are not time-critical, and infrequently used. There’s a practical limit to how many physical buttons can be added to a dashboard before the clutter becomes a nightmare of its own. So IMO, the ideal is a mixture of physical buttons and touchscreen controls.

Exactly. I don't think there's even enough area to go 100% buttons. I remember some vehicle from 10-20 years ago where the center IP/console was nothing but tiny buttons, which was a different sort of hell. It's fine to move the less-used functions to a touchscreen.

Know what else really sucks? No gearshift! My little car is lovely on almost every way except two: 1) no lock on the glovebox and 2) no gearshift. They use big flat buttons! That’s fine in the parking lot; out on real roads it’s good to have eyes on the road and a hand on the stick. Muscle memory.

Just recently drove a Chevy Traverse, and that damn screen felt like navigating a freaking spaceship! I hated everything about it. Couldn’t find how to manually turn on the lights 😵‍💫

I think there’s one out there. The company is called Slate, the vehicles are affordable and very utilitarian. They will be available late this year or 2026 I think

I wouldn’t mind a good combination of the two with a HUD providing the information directly in front of the driver. Steering controls that aren’t cumbersome would be beneficial.

It wouldn't be wise to use the screens while driving, but let passenger handle it for you, if you're driving by yourself, wait until you're at the red lights or stop sign, then you can use the touch screen for real quick or use the phone to play something through the screen like Spotify or App Music

There are music players that connect via Miracast that map the most important features (swapping song and pause/play) into buttons. You could ask for a bigger screen for Google/Apple Maps during drive, but just don't make users use a touchscreen – not even a copilot, distracts – while one's driving.

Most of the time when you're driving, Google Maps will not let the passenger type down the address, but can quick select the address they needed to go, or they needed to use the voice command, while you can still control Spotify, which passenger can control that, maybe playlists or podcasts.

Still, if you're driving, having someone else extend into the middle of the car does still distract, if not even removing visibility from the driver. If someone needs to check something out touchscreen-wise, make it so the car has Miracast features to let the passengers change from the phone.

Nice. Some of never left cos the screens clearly increased the distracted driving time and was unsafe. Take the texting and video signs off freeways too and go back to still pics.

Are you suggesting that my current car, where the heated seat controls on the touch screen (and how I interact with them) change every f**king time they issue a software fix is less safe to drive than my last car, where they were a physical button in a known place?

Among U.S. drivers, an estimated 43% (56% of men, 29% of women) drove impaired by alcohol, illegal drugs, or prescriptions that aversely affect reaction time in the past 6 months. So not only are screens worse than being drunk/high, but lots of drivers are using them WHILE ALSO DRUNK AND/OR HIGH

Anybody who has ever tried to touch type on an iPhone would already know this. The visual context switching needed for reading a touchscreen is far longer than the response time most drivers have in a potential accident.

Our EV has a nice mix of buttons and touch screen. Things we don’t have to access while driving—navigation, battery stats, etc.—are on the screen. More important stuff accessed more often while driving—volume, drive style, seat warmers, PNDR—are buttons on the wheel or easily accessed from the seat.

I recently bought a car with touchscreens that still has buttons for volume and climate. Much easier to use than other family cars which require diving thru multiple screens to change say, the temp.

One reason I have held on to my 2012 vehicle is my dislike of touchscreens. New safety features sound great, but I guess you really need lane assistance if you are constantly searching for buttons.

I absolutely approve I can't stand nothing but a touch screen I like knobs and buttons and they work so well for so long this was the car companies trying to get cute and innovative and becoming a pain in the f****** ass bring back a gear shift or two nobody wants to turn a knob to put it in Drive

The two things that have held me from moving from 90s/00s econoboxes to EVs was lack of buttons and weird proprietary electrical components (when in theory it should be simpler and cheaper than ICE aside from battery pack costs, glorified forklift motor and all) Then it's just how it feels

My dad was a human factors engineer for NASA and the military and I studied ergonomics in college. We have had MANY discussions about how horrible screens are. They look cool at auto shows and save carmakers in manufacturing costs but screens are not designed for driving.

I'm a fan of displays in cars as long as common sense is used to only relegate non-critical components and "helpers" like maps to the screen. One factor I'm interested in that I may be missing - how does manipulating physical knobs factor in to reaction times? Does it beat voice still?

It absolutely does Voice commands are extremely problematic especially in a vehicle. Environmental noise causes issues, language recognition is an issue, kids in the car shouting, construction, etc. Tactile buttons work 100% of the time unless something mechanical fails.

It’s more than just buttons versus touchscreens. Luxury and tech features have gone way over the top. Too much clutter & unnecessary stuff. Get back to basics and good design. When we have portable tech devices, we might want Bluetooth, but we don’t need all this stuff built into cars.

Indeed, traditionally, we often used cars to “escape” all this excessive stuff in our midst. We would deliberately & smartly choose the bare essentials to take on a journey, & what was left behind. The motorcycle or scooter could be even more symbolic of this scaling-down & a vehicle to freedom.

Touch screens are distracting as hell. And putting all the controls on the steering wheel just turns it into a rotating joystick - great for gaming, but not so much if you're trying to avoid getting hit by other distracted video warriors...

Heck yeah! I personally don't mind touch screens for certain functions but anything drivers use on a frequent basis (volume knobs, cruise control, etc) or want to just do quickly (temp adjust) needs to be a button. And not a capacitive button but a regular button that you KNOW you pressed.

It was also a problem that 40% of users lack the level of tactile touch to get touch screens to even work, as they have similar problems with smartphones, just because their fingertips lack the oils to work properly. Having to lick a finger just to push a button is stupid.

So I'm not alone. I carry a stylus around with me. The spouse looked it up not too long ago and found it's called zombie finger, so I keep hearing about it. 😆 So glad I have a couple of different buttons on my steering wheel.

Why are people fucking with shit while they are driving? You're not supposed to use your phone while driving either, it's the same thing. Most functions can be done via the steering will controls. I can use voice commands too, and I drive a 2013 Ford Fusion Titanium.

When I had a Tesla I used the voice commands for everything as it was much easier (and safer) than using the touch screen. Saying "Wipers off" was easier than the screen. However, most people don't know they can do all the button things with voice. And you have to stop a conversation to do it.

10yrs after ditching my music, it resurged. I was writing again like a thing possessed and bought a state of the art portastudio said to be user friendly. I was a boss with my last one with buttons that made sense. 10yrs on the 'better' model even beat my professional computer man. Gimme buttons!!

100% agree we don't need functionality buttons on a touch screen. But having a screen for the GPS is SO much safer for me than trying to rig my small phone up on my air vent and having to look at that.

One of the many things I hated about my Tesla before it mercifully was incinerated in the Eaton Fire, was the complete lack of buttons (and general forsaking of practicality in the name of “cool”).

I just got 2 EVs. One's a Volvo and one's a Honda. Its absurd how deep into the touchscreens I must go to make adjustments. On the Volvo, to adjust my side mirrors, which I might need to do while driving, I have to push multiple touchscreen buttons to activate the regular buttons

I otherwise really like both cars, but it is so frustrating. I had to pull the Honda over the other night because my husband had a weird one-pedal drive setting turned on and I could barely drive. I had no idea how to turn it off. It was many menus deep and a lot of trial and error

I am utterly convinced that those who design touchscreen software are teeny tiny people with teeny tiny fingers. At 6'4" (193cm) I just can't. I'm going to stick with my "buckboard" of a 2002 Jeep Wrangler until these people come to their senses.

Yup, somebody thought it would be "cool" and because they were already installing a touch screen for the infotainment system they could save $10 on each car by eliminating physical buttons... So mostly (as is usually the case) the bean counters are to blame.

The dearth of real buttons is honestly one of the reasons I've put off shopping for a new car. I've been waiting for the industry to get "all screens, all the time!" out of its system, and once again make safety a priority.

Mine has this long wordy message it flashes up about paying attention to the road not the screen, it only appears randomly, after I’ve started driving and has two ‘buttons’ the one nearest to me is the change language button, not the dismiss button.