Post

Tilly Norwood has been billed the first AI "actor" in Hollywood which raises questions about what awards synthetic performers should be nominated for. In an exclusive chat with CNN's Elizabeth Wagmeister, Tilly Norwood responded to questions about winning an Oscar.

14 reposts76 likes

When the next Oscar nominations come out, you have to tell us which real woman should have her nomination stripped away in favor of this.

Time to start reporting every post promoting AI trash. Make Bluesky consider it so toxic to their productivity that they start banning posts that shove this shit down our throats.

I'm thinking it's for those who use it constantly and want to be the first of society spreading the most misinformation they can. This is why Reds love it. We've already seen evidence of them using it and the AI shows are just.. awful. 😂 You've seen the fruit couples?

Here's a fact that keeps getting lost in these debates: in order for something to be copywritten it has to be created by humans. This has actually been tested in court. Nothing created by AI can be owned. How many millions of dollars will Hollywood burn through before reality hits them?

HERE'S WHY CNN CAN GET BENT FOR PROMOTING THIS SLOP: YOU CANNOT REPLACE HUMANITY...AND OUR RAGE AT THE ATTEMPTS IS BUILDING.

Michael Warburton@michaelwarburton.bsky.social

He NEVER went up his own ass, and for a global Hollywood superstar that is a very very rare thing. A visibly moved HARRISON FORD accepting his AFI Life Achievement Award in L.A earlier this year.

FUCKING CLOWNSHOW. ANYONE WHO TAKES THIS SHIT SERIOUSLY, PRETENDING TO DO INTERVIEWS WITH IT OR LIKE IT'S "ART", IS A SELF-INFANTALIZED IMBECILE WHO SHOULD GET 24/7 NURSING CARE AND SUPERVISION. THE ONLY SERIOUS QUESTION THIS RAISES IS WHETHER THE PEOPLE AT CNN NEED TO REVISIT KINDERGARTEN.

"TILLY NORWOOD" DIDN'T RESPOND TO JACK SHIT. SHE DOESN'T EXIST. ONES AND ZEROES PERFORMING CIRCUS TRICKS. CNN IS ACTIVELY NORMALIZING AND SELLING A PSYCHOLOGICAL GRIFT PREYING ON THE PSYCHE'S TENDENCY TO ANTHROPOMORPHIZE, ASSISTING THE GRIFT VIA "LET'S PRETEND" INTERVIEWS WITH CIRCUITRY OUTPUT.

THEY "DESERVE" NOTHING BUT DESTRUCTION, SCORN, DENIGRATION AND PURE INCANDESCENT OUTRAGE FROM EVERYONE WHO BELIEVES THE BETTERMENT OF MANKIND REQUIRES US TO PRACTICE OUR HUMANITY OURSELVES AND STRUGGLE WHILE DOING SO. FUCK THE OLIGARCHY PUSHING THIS SHIT ON US. THEY MUST BE DESTROYED WITH IT.

AI SLOP BEGONE!!! THIS DOESN'T RAISE ANY QUESTIONS LIKE THAT WHATSOEVER. CNN PRETENDING IT DOES IS A WAY OF ASSISTING THEM WITH ADVERTISING IT. #BOYCOTTCNN

I would argue that saying they're trying to make Tilly Northwood happen is too generous. There is not a single actual published movie, show or independent advertisement that features Tilly Northwood. The only thing it appears in is media about how it is a thing that is happening.

Not going to read or watch anything about “her” but if you’re going to pretend it’s not just a computer special effect (which it is), for reasons you should ask if she’s a virgin.

Does it embarrass you to ask such a clownish question? Tilly Norwood has “existed” for what, a year now? And has fewer actual credits than I do. It’s vaporware.

Robot Rights: Let’s think about a (perhaps) fictive context: There is an governance structure in blockchain communities called DAO (decetralized autonomous organization). Shortly put: it’s a weighted voting system where every „wallet“ (not person!) has a vote weighted on the amount of tokens.

When implementing a corporate structure with an interface to trigger certain events by such weighted votes (buying raw materials, hiring/firing maintenance workers, „airdrop“ payouts to several „wallets“), then anonymous „shareholder“ governance is established.

If such structure would be granted the state of a „legal entity“, it could run one (or more) corporations completely led by anonymous voters. This would „free“ decision makers from accountability while simultaneously granting them the possibility to squeeze the system for profit.

I remember when Showgirls’ promo website offered an Eliza “sex cyberchat” with the character. Entertainment Weekly decided on an honest interview— “Q: Why is this movie so bad? A: Just because. 😘 Q: Should Elizabeth Berkeley try going back to Saved By the Bell? A: I’ll try anything once.”

No. They made a music video using an actor and overlaying it with a CGI Norwood skin. It cannot act, as in, you can’t give it a script and have it play a believable character in a scene.

The Academy literally updated its rules to exclude AI from awards. This interview was stupid from the beginning, but its also absolutely pointless other than just another method to force this shit down people's throats.