Post

Feeling like a genius for looking up Dungeon Crawler Carl images so I can learn I will hate hate hate every moment of this and not waste any money checking it out lol oh so it's just Ready Player One but if Ernest Cline listened to less dadrock and played Portal and Borderlands gotcha

83 reposts792 likes

I read a bit of the Korean graphic novel and immediately went "Oh there are no themes or meaning here. It's just going to be thousands of pages of 'Carl and Donut do this thing, it's cool. Then they do this thing, it's funny.'"

There's a lot of themes in the books, relating to trauma, free will, freedom and capitalism, morality under capitalism... The first book takes a bit to get into that part, building the world first, but even then there are early hints with Mordecai.

It's absurdist horror that transcends its litrpg framework to tell a multilayered story (all of which affect and interact with each other) with characters that change and develop and themes of found family, critiques of late capitalism and the attention economy, and managing unmanageable trauma

I haven't read it, and my only exposure has been through Distractible (Markiplier & Friends podcast), and I realized none of them actually read books. It seems like easy reading pulp fiction for people who don't like readin' them words on tha page.

I tried to listen to the audiobook and got about 30mins in before the physical discomfort I was attempting to endure grew too much. The prose is pretty bad by itself, and when it’s coupled with the audiobook reader’s performance it’s so viscerally awful that I can still feel it anytime I think of it

The comparison to RPO is unfair. It's much better than that. It has actual themes and characters and plot. But I can definitely see why these bits would cause folks to bounce off, and that is totally fine!

LMAOOO DUDE Also the defensiveness of saying "BUT IT HAS THEMES" meanwhile I'm talking about the style of writing and sense of humor specifically is doin my head in. Like yeah man, annoyingly written books can have themes. Cool yeah. Still annoying though!

seeing a lot of quote posts saying "it's not Ready Player One, c'mooon" speaking from my experience as someone who was forced to read Ready Player One for an assignment and can recognize that prose on sight: this is Ready Player One

That's how I feel any time I recommend people one of my favorite "monster/supernatural romance" books and I'm reminded that my tastes are a weird mish-mash. And that most books in that category have found mainstream appeal *because* they're kinda sanitized. 😭

House on the Cerulean Sea and This Is How You Lose the Time War wrecked it for me. So much hype over books I really could not enjoy.

"The Good Guys" series came out in 2018 and was a little more self aware of how silly the premise was, there was a something of a glut of "isekai, but you're being watched for entertainment" around that time frame iirc. DCC just seems to be something normal people are latching on as "new"

I *hated* the first book, but kept going & honestly enjoyed the rest. It is NOT for everyone & has a number of very deep flaws, but it definitely isn't Ready Player One!! It's more of an intro to progressive thought for edgy white Millennial gamer dudes. The Hunger Games meets Hitchhiker's Guide

The Crawl is a fascist takeover turned reality show. The edgy humor is the host normalizing abuse & dehumanization of players. The video game 'system' gamifies compliance while enforcing strict rules. The players are trying to break the 'system' while surviving inside of it. I dunno, it's alright!

Ex: the annoying "Carl doesn't wear pants!!" humor is recontextualized as him being forced into existing as a brand for followers & sponsorships, that brand being pigeonholed into his worsening sexualization and humiliation for audience entertainment, while he grapples with feelings of exploitation

For the record, not trying to convince you to read it *at all*, I would not recommend the series to most people lol. I'm just autistic & have a lot to say!! Not all of it is good (some of it is pretty awful) but I found that the core message resonates in our current hellscape

It's absolute gamer slop and I thought I would hate it but the overall plot was compelling enough that I did listen through them. It was light enough to be something that I could listen to as background.

Lmao just this past weekend I requested it from my library, thumbed to a random page when it was available for pickup, and immediately dropped it back into the return slot.

Welcome to the entire LitRPG genre, which has been a wildly popular thing for yeaaaaaars now. There are a couple smart things to come from it. This series is not one of them.

I think the best of them are running on the premise of "how would a world and its people be warped by functioning on video game mechanic rules"

It started with things like dot Hack and Sword Art Online which were like "what if you got trapped in a videogame" which, at least that's a premise? And then it basically just turned into wish fulfillment for people who never go outside.

well, in this specific case, the point was 'guy who has never written a book before starts writing serial online fiction during covid, it gets popular on royalroad, and he gets a publishing deal.'

People make fun of me for reading light novels; but honestly only the worst slop amongst them reads like this. The rest are much, MUCH better. The fact that this is popular is telling me that the audience is actually people with no taste....

Yeeuupp. The cards against humanity "sense of humor" never goes away throughout. It is heavy weapons grade millennial bait. Its extra embarassing because there's elements to this particular genre the author understands pretty well but the humor is just so so bad 98% of the time.

Dinniman does this thing through the series where every time an IP is namedropped he has to include what kind of medie. like "the star wars movies" or "the mario kart game

They're already doing the thing in your replies where they're like "Yeah the first one sucks but it gets way better" and it's like ... sorry homie, if you read through 500 pages of this shit and sought out the next one, maybe I don't trust you when you say that.

I like dcc, buts its absolutely lowest common denominator drek. although I’d argue its closer to isekai “that time I was reincarnated as a slime” slop than Ready Player One. Its an endless story about a dude’s number going up as he fights other things that have their number go up.

I read the first book because the weight of curiosity got to be too much and you’re absolutely correct - it’s a black mark on all of civilization, and by extension me, and I still think I might read a sequel. I can’t unpack that.

Besides the 2007 bacon humor, my biggest complaint is the structure: Words are a magic spell that puts fiction in people’s brains! Video game mechanics abstract and hide fiction. If you just tell me “I gave the llama a poison status” you have short circuit’ed of the part of words that are fun!

Didn't know anything about this until I picked up an adaptation that was being given away on Free Comic Book Day. Christ, it was like someone trying their own smartass version of all the dime-a-dozen isekai manga and light novels out there. Tossed it into my recycling can.

The books are just a silly lite read. But in this modern era the comodification, followed by enshitification, seems inevitable. (the pop culture falls in to the Vin diagram of large population + game culture) I havent had the fortitude to see if the game is playable.

I think that is not going to work well because a core premise of the book is the AI dungeonmaster has gone rogue and is hazing everyone Paranoia style

The defenses I've seen of this amount to "you have to give it a chance to explain itself" or "you have to meet it on it's own terms" and a page count like that still wouldn't be sufficient to "explain itself" enough

I cannot emphasize enough that I did not cherry pick these examples. They are the ones that showed up in a google image search for excerpts. Most of them were people posting POSITIVELY about these excerpts (made them laugh, etc), not to make a bad example of it. Alls I'm sayin is it ain't for me

re: "BUT IT HAS THEMES, RPO DOESN'T" Um, yes, okay, that's nice? Good? I believe you and I'm glad, that's dope. It's still written very annoyingly (like RPO's humor style), for me! That doesn't make the journey to experience the themes very worthwhile if I don't like its sense of humor!

I’m enjoying it, but I can understand this opinion. I balked at your RPO comparison because they’re only similar on the surface level. RPO is pure fantasy wish fulfillment, whereas DCC is the complete opposite (and essentially Hunger Games)

Speaking as someone who does quite enjoy the series, I feel like it's worth pointing out that it's worth noting that the series included with Kindle Unlimited so it was/is functionally free to check out for a lot of readers. I do think it's weird that it's getting as popular as it is, though.

Honestly I might be even able to get through the audiobooks if it weren’t for the Carl voice being so… gotdang annoying. it’s like a bad Patrick Warburton impression with none of his cool

This is funny because the two common defenses I've heard of the series are "it takes a couple books to get good" and "the audiobook performance is great and makes up for the bad writing". But now apparently the audiobook performance ALSO sucks and takes a few books to get good.

LitRPG is a weird genre and I don't really think its for me. That said, from what I've heard Dungeon Crawler Carl is at least funny and self aware, unlike Ready Player One.

It's too long and too puerile but I liked it! It was presented to me as slop and it was fine slop! 2666 it certainly isn't but I didn't expect that coming in. It's definitely not Terry Pratchett either. I think it's about Neal Stephenson level but with different (kinder more humanist) opinions.

As someone who has read ready player one, I disagree. Ready player one was all about masterbating to 80's nostalgia and how that made the protagonist "special" DCC is about how popculture is used to enslave and torture society for the entertainment of the elite and how fucked that is.

Im not normally a fan of litrpgs, but ive been really taken by this one. The themes of capitalism is destroying the world and everything in it, and humans are at their best when forming communities are alittle on the nose. Also, gallows humor, satire, and explaing why objectification is bad.

There are so many short choppy emotionless sentences that say nothing, you can really tell that this was, indeed, a bored guy in 2020 lockdown going "I'd like to write a book!" despite never having done that and probably very little reading. Nothing means anything, it's all so lolrandom.

He's constantly getting more loot boxes and abilities and items that add to his bottomless inventory but we can't see it, so he drily explains what they get after every encounter only for it to instantly disappear and mean nothing. I'm sure he's got a very intricate google sheet of items and powers.

Keep hearing they get better but I dunno, if it takes 3+ books to get good, or to even go anywhere or do anything, maybe you needed to reimagine some shit. Because I gave the first one a fair shake and there are a lot of "jokes" that stop just shy of the R-slur. "That's just the AI's voice." Uh. Ew.

Like yeah, I guess apparently later (like six books in!)they end up fighting back against the system and taking on the Man and it rails against capitalism and stuff? But Hunger Games did that and more in fewer books with better characters and more cohesion and interesting writing. I don't see it.

People will look you square in the face and say this is great writing, while also somehow turning their nose up at Ready Player One. Not an endorsement for either but I gotta say, RPO at least leaves me feeling like I read a poorly written *book* This thing feels like someone skimmed all fan wikia

Yikers on a stick. And to thinl Seth Mcfarlane wants to lets be adopted? Holy shit this reeks of "millenial" out of touch humor and bad writing. And there was a guy who convinced me that Dungeon Crawler Carl was good at the SDCC bus. Damn.......this sucks.

I saw a positive review say that Donut was the best part of this, and just from these excerpts, I agree

Somebody out there actually laughed out loud when the description of toast ends with "fuck you" for no reason and that person is allowed to contribute to society.

I was beating myself up for not reading this after being recommended it. I guess I wasn't actually being lazy, I was sensing the vibes and steering clear because WOW lol

Are we not all guilty of enjoying at least one cringe self-insert fanfiction with gamer UI? Homestuck, Ready Player One, Sword Art Online, etc, etc. On that spectrum, Dungeon Crawler Carl is in the upper half, imo. At least it’s not ideologically incoherent like Ready Player One is, lol.

Worst part is is that its getting adopted by Seth Mcfarlane. Hey remember the time when I got Isekai'd to a Dungeon not in delicious world but one that is meant to be like Invincible and The Boys if it sucked more? Yikes on a bike.

People keep recommending it to me, and I thought to myself: "Let me just read the plot synopsis of the first one on Wikipedia to see of it's anywhere close to my taste." There are 8 and none have their own page! None have a plot synopsis! The fan base allows this. All I need to know.

I have a book club with my friends and a few of them are really pushing for this book next month. I am dreading it. Will definitely be a skip for me if it wins out for our group. Lol

For me, it's anything (besides actual games) marketed as being for gamers or gamers coded, not just books. I've been gaming for over 35 years. I know what gets marketed towards gamers. I know it always ends up being trash.

From what I've seen Dungeon Crawler Carl is actually like the best of the genre. At least its self aware and funny from what I've heard. Most litRPG just feels like fanfic wish fulfillment that should stay in one's diary but if it makes people happy I guess...

If it makes you feel better, every single person I know says the first book is objectively the worst! Though for all I know that is the climactic scene of the eighth

I try to be pretty live and let live about reading tastes. But the other day, I found out this genre is called LitRPG, and that only denotes that characters or the narrator verbalize when game mechanics are happening in the story?

I read the first book, loaned by a friend. It was sort of a fun lightweight story, but you have to put up with every epic edgy memes by two generations of 14 year olds varnished over everything, and that's reasonable to be repelled by it, because its bad bad in that respect.

yup yup yup i read it at the insistence of my roommate and had to find a lot of creatively polite ways to say "i hate this so much, it is absolutely not for me"

the comparison to Ernest Cline feels a little unfair, if only because this guy strikes me as a basically decent human. there's a whole thing in the book about an ICE agent who takes the book's premise as an excuse to start murdering people at random so his moral compass seems fine

Also, just judging by these couple of paragraphs the writing does seem better than Cline. It's *hard* to stoop to that level. But I suspect that's part of the appeal; it's Ernest Cline that's not quite as aggressively insulting to your intelligence.

ok fair play, he hasn't actually DONE anything that i know of, but. he wrote this on his website, and then i made fun of him for it on twitter and he added a note to the bottom saying "this was inspired by the woman who is now MY WIFE, who is very smart and has a PhD" www.reddit.com/r/menwriting...

reddit.comFrom the menwritingwomen community on Reddit: Ernest Cline, author of "Ready Player One", wrote a "poem" years ago. It's called "Nerd Porn Auteur". Enjoy.Posted by rlcute - 112 votes and 34 comments

i wrote a mini-thread about it a while back but i think this is the quickest summary i can give after finishing the book bsky.app/profile/did:...

pocklecool@igrat.bsky.social

it's like a 3-way pileup between an isekai light novel, CAD (the webcomic), and someone who really wants to tell you about the skilltree of their D&D character in minute detail

It gets better as the series goes on, but I get why people are turned off by the style of writing. And I hate Ready Player One. This somehow worked for me. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Same! It's so funny any time I recommend these books it's always with warnings like okay the first one is the worst by a LOT. And I swear they are going interesting places with these concepts! I would never just recommend it blind 😭

That's totally okay the first book is not well written at all! I think later books have redeeming qualities also Jeff Hayes narration does HEAVY lifting esp in the first book. Again I think these books have some pretty large drawbacks which is why I warn people and don't rec them to everyone

The gonorrhea one is actually from what many fans consider the best book in the series. lol everyone has their own tastes, it's fine. I more cringe at the RPO comparison even though I get how it looks from the outside. Within the narrative Carl rolls his eyes at the names and descriptions of items.

I just think about how long LotR was and how many characters are in it and fleshed out and have arcs and themes and rich world building and SONGS and lore and i'm like... that was done is SO few pages compared to this, is this just incredibly sparse time-wasting prose constantly? lol

okay, but a lot of licenced franchise literature is substantially better than this kind of fad stuff bc there u have workaday pulp writers who know what they're doing. that's not a guarantee of quality or a work suiting your taste, but it's something.

I've only read the first one, and it has a few inkling of foundation for anti capitalist/authoritarian stuff but it did not click with me. I am intrigued by the large scale space opera it supposedly hits by book 4, with book 3 being a odd hurdle according to a coworker who is a big Carl fan.

Really glad to have seen this post, a bunch of friends in my tabletop group won't shut up about this series and this is my first time actually seeing any of the writing. This seems absolutely insufferable.