Post

The first article is obviously a valid critique of Apple (and it's really, really bad!) but this one is ridiculous. They make it explicitly clear that "ask app not to track" is not a guarantee, and they can only do so much to control what third party apps do.

If you think that they couldn't make it a guarantee or they don't deliberately imply as much as possible that asking an app not to track you means it, you know, doesn't track you, I have a bridge to sell you.

Just to confirm. Are they only agreeing to the payout because the phone was listening even if you had not first said "Hello Siri" But if you had said "Hello Siri" was it within Apple's right to sell anything you said to a third party? Cos I'm guessing some people didn't know that.

When I spent a week in the hospital I got a bunch of ads for nursing equipment. My phone had just been sitting in my purse across the room from me until the last couple of days.

Aha! I always defended Apple, telling my suspicious friends that they were wrong. Boy, I am embarrassed now. And with Siri’s little eavesdropping diary, Apple knows I defended them, so I should be paid double!

The Guardian article it cites is about quality control workers hearing private information during Siri activations. Big jump from that to these recording being used for advertising and the author of this article seems to pull that connection out of thin air.

I think Amazon has been doing this shit, too. YEARS AGO, I remember telling people on Reddit that I got an ad for a powered pencil sharpener, right after I used my loud old hand-cranked pencil sharpener, near my Alexa device. I was told that I was being a paranoid moron. Who's the moron now?

the alleged spying never occurred. debate me

barbarism decliner@2names1scott.com

people who read the headline only: there is no evidence that Apple is doing this, nor is this an admission from them. a $95M settlement for that many potentially impacted users is the just the price Apple is paying to avoid discovery of random corporate documents.

I do it on purpose when I visit my brother's because he doesn't believe it's a thing. I leave his house and his tv's youtube account is filled with sponsored recommendations for cosmetics because I'll repeat a few times in a loud voice about how I need eyeshadow (I do not wear makeup.)

$20 seems low. If you caught some random local company or person bugging your house seems like you would get awarded whole lot more in civil court

During the 2020 lockdown I was talking to my husband about how I have no idea what a sourdough starter is. An hour later I had the Google app open on my iPhone and there was a recommended article in my feed on sourdough starters. I had never used my phone or devices to research this. 🙃

god damned mother fuckers.... I don't even use Siri on my phone, I never activated it, and they still listened to my private conversations to serve me targeted ads. I thought I was being paranoid. $20? that's it? for invading my home? I hate fucking corporations and the bastards that run them,

I *know* Google is spying on me via my android. My husband & I had an obscure convo about castor oil & my feed was suddenly filled with stories & ads for...you guessed it! The only solution is to turn off the phone which, of course, defeats the purpose of having one.

The lesson, as always, never trust Apple, (or any corporation for that matter), but especially Apple. Apple doesn't treat its customers any differently than Trump treats the MAGA faithful; they're just better at marketing the abuse.

I don't even have Siri turned on and I get ads for items mentioned in conversation and never searched for. Keep the damn thing in another room or turned off.

But this is not what the settlement is about is it? The initial whistleblower was about how Apple sent these unintentional recordings to people who worked on the system to recognize the wake word, right? "Apple admitted to no wrongdoing. Instead, the settlement refers to "unintentional"

Siri activation that occurred after the "Hey, Siri" feature [...], where recordings were apparently prompted without users ever saying the trigger words" Sometimes Siri would be inadvertently activated, a whistleblower told The Guardian, when an Apple Watch was raised and speech was detected."

I'm not saying this is great by Apple, but as far as I'm aware this is not evidence of the kind of "constant surveillance" that people sometimes think is happening, ie this is not a lawsuit about "the phone is always listening to me to send me ads" afaik we have no strong evidence for that

What this implies is that Siri is using your info for targeted ads even when you know you're talking to it, which is disingenuous on Apple's part to say the least and I'll probably have more to say about this once I read the Siri promises on Apple's page and then it's privacy policy again.

20 dollars per device, but yeah it's basically free. The article notes that they could have been liable for 1.5 billion instead.

Always listening for an activation phrase means *always listening*. All it has to do is make note of keywords it hears and sell your "interest" to advertisers so they can take advantage of it. If I can think of it, I'm sure others already have.

Haven’t had any issue with Siri, but a few years ago husband and I were talking about getting a Litter Robot for cats, and I started getting Litter Robot ads on Google on my laptop. Mic was turned off on computer, but Alexa was on kitchen counter. Makes no sense. I give up on the modern world. 😔

The per-head return on class actions is so low it's informative as to what privacy rights are actually worth. Equifax offered me 7 bucks. A parking meter app had payment data leak (and lied about the scope of the breach) and offered 25 bucks or 1 dollar of free credit in-app 🥴

Yeah that’s not good evidence. Targeted ads have been long sophisticated to know things about you without secret recordings from Apple (something this article doesn’t seem to show the plaintiffs ever actually proving). Like that time Target knew a person was pregnant before they did.

Seems like someone got a good class action suit going, and Apple eventually acquiesced. One of those examples in the article is literally just a basic well advertised Apple Watch feature, and not some secret spying thing. I think the average person just doesn’t get how well they’re being tracked.

They say this like similar things haven't been happening for over a decade. I've gotten ads that I can only say happened because google is psychic, or was listening to every thing I say. This has to be like, at least the third time they've gotten in trouble for this.

I may or may not have had distrust/disdain for siri/cortana/etc. since day one. My mom may have gotten a tablet for the kitchen that I try to keep unplugged whenever I can because I don't trust it and it jumpscares me with the weather forecast at 3am when I'm trying to get a glass of water.

It could be coincidence - you’re sensitised to an ad appearing as it’s in your head from talking about it, or it could be you linger on a post in fb or do a Google search. … I don’t like Siri but keep it on in case something happens that I have to say “ Siri, call 911” or some suchlike

That is a possibility. But the evil of tech companies hungry for data and ad revenue can't be ignored. I wonder why we've not heard from programmers. If devices are doing this then the code exists somewhere. The proof is in some text files yet we've not seen it.

This was about a fairly rare medical condition. It wasn’t something you would normally get an advertisement for. I’m also amused that it apparently doesn’t “listen” to the movies I watch. At least, I don’t get advertising related to them. I do love to watch movies! 🍿

But my pretentious graphic design colleagues always told me that Apple wasn’t like other multinational mega-corporations. That Apple truly cares about the wellbeing of their customers above profits.

lol... I used to wander around my apartment going "man, I really wish I had a good place to buy some FISHING POLES", since I have no interest in fishing IRL, to see if my phone/smart devices were listening and serving me targeted ads based on what I was talking about around them

apple: we illegally harvested billions of dollars of eavesdropped consumer data that was then leveraged against users in the form of perfectly-targeted ad messaging. we’re real sorry, here’s $20

Discussing this with friends right now and was there actual evidence of them selling the data or is that just a claim by the plaintiffs? I'm not well versed in this, but someone I know who is says this isn't reflected in Apple's financials anywhere.

Once I woke up in the middle of the night with diarrhea. My husband woke and asked if I was okay. Told him I had diarrhea. As I got back into bed my phone lit up with an Immodium ad. Yeah - they are listening to us for sure!

What evidence is there for this claim besides random nontechnical users continually insisting it must be happening despite no real evidence over the decade+ people have been trying to find it? “I talked about a thing once and got an ad for it!” Pure tinfoil hattery lapped up in anti tech hysteria

Well provide actual evidence of it happening, not confirmation bias anecdotes like most people in this thread, or a settlement that doesn't really mean anything?

I'm not a "urr durr Apple is the best at privacy" idiot, but we need more concrete evidence this happens on purpose instead of the plausible alternative that (1) confirmation bias is rampant and (2) voice-activation is shitty and often activates when not wanted. Both can be true at the same time

$20! How much revenue did Apple made selling your private information? A Christ more than $95 million. I once bought a thermostat that you could give voice commands .... turns out it was transmitting my address to every marketer that would pay for the data. Its in the garbage now.