Post

Opposition to I.C.E. is controversial? Next you'll be telling me that thinking Pete Hegseth is a fucking imbecile is controversial.

“supports pro-palestinian causes” appearing as one of the “controversial stances” really says what a lot of us have known for a long time, challenging the anti-arab/anti-swana status quo is itself treated as morally suspect

Those orgs really do their best to feed antisemitism when their immediate response to "Gazan children should have human rights" is "why are you attacking the Jews?!!"

A shocking amount of the Right Wing Media ecosystem is used to their audience being conditioned by Bircher Propoganda. Theyre having a rude awakening, because relying on trigger words to brand people as evil backfires when you aim at Mr. Rogers, and those like him.

What is even real anymore? In a week from now, will Count Chocula be mayor somewhere over there? Has he beaten the sexual misconduct allegations yet? I'm far too old to watch current US politics. #VoteForElmo

Every day I try to do work, and every day I have to spend about an hour just digesting foreign US nonsense, just to stay sane, and the only sanity I can cling to, is Steve Jackson's #ParanoiaRPG. *IT IS SO BAD!* #FreakingOut #NeedHappyPill

Nothing controversial about any of that, but it is a threat to the millionaires and oligarchs which is why they discuss it. Made up "controversy."

How does this actually play with their viewers?!?! Like rather than think “I’m not letting my kids watch Ms Rachel” I’d be thinking “hmm, maybe Ms Rachel has a point?”

Pro-Palestinian =/= anti-Jewish, and Fox News is deliberately creating the monster that is intrinsic antisemitism by trying to make people decide between the lives of two peoples, just the same way they've built up racism against Black, Hispanic, and others US minorities.

The only way Fox's Christo-Fascist dominated world can succeed is if we divide ourselves into pointless factions over who deserves to live. Safety, health, and opportunity come to those communities who don't play the Fox News commercialized games of Oppression Olympics.

Be so for real, Rupert Murdoch would have burned Mr. Rogers alive on air and toasted marshmallows over the flaming corpse.

Stop, Fox, it isn't possible for me to like Ms. Rachel any more than I already do Ms. Rachel For Universal Healthcare Ms. Rachel For Free School Lunches For Every Kid Ms. Rachel For Puppies For Everyone

Do they know what "controversial" means? I mean the first two, sure, they can be described as controversial. I'm not saying she is wrong on either, but there is widespread disagreement. But the last two are majority-backed positions at this point.

Lol. None of these stances are controversial and reflect a highly developed moral and ethical sense. Only Fox viewers who have been subjected to a never-ending stream of lies and propaganda from Fox would think these positions are controversial.

i appreciate how they cover their asses with grammar by offering Abdul and Angie as members of the DSA/Far Left. DSA is easy to define, Far Left is easy to leave vague. The producers are learning via lawsuit.

They raged over Sesame Street introducing a non-binary Muppet and booed the memory of Mr. Rogers, so this is hardly a shock

The last one is really funny to me. Like maybe the rest are "controversial" in that there's opposition (even though she's right on all of them), but I love the idea of a Fox News viewer going "What!? Everyone needs a billion dollars!"

On the points raised in that graphic: 1. Excellent. 2. Excellent. 3. Excellent. 4. Excellent. That's five stars for Ms. Rachel. The extra is just for being generally excellent.

Believe people when they tell you who they are- Fox News prefers protecting their political interests and is willing to bash childrens TV presenters if that helps distract from the nonsense

supports "pro-Palestinian causes" like not bombing the absolute fuck out of children, hospitals, and every single structure in Gaza including tents. Ok.

"No one needs a billion dollars" is, absent a whole bunch of inflation, an objectively true statement.

I don't understand it, like I get that the point of the hyperfocus on her is to make an example out of her. But the average American hog has formed their opinion of celebrities by the stories told to them on TV. As far as I'm aware she's some kind of kids edutainment presenter & those have good reps

Like all it does it give a lot more notoriety and clout to a person who could probably easily be ignored since everyone probably thinks something like, "oh the blues clues guy, he's harmless", but they just can't help themselves so they keep trying for this weak point of attack

Get ready for another boomer round of "why won't my adult child talk to me?" Fox News is going to get grandma to tell you to not let your kid watch Ms. Rachel.

Shortly after the segment teaching their audience that Ms Rachel’s stances are “controversial” was an argument that the lady who Tennessee was unable to kill by lethal injection should now face a firing squad.

A billionaire in the us in 2026 has obscene wealth. If we're talking hyperinflation era zimbabwe dollars, a billion dollars there was barely worth the paper it was printed on iirc.

I get it you can spin a few to look bad...but the billion dollars one how tf can you spin that to be bad...?

"Supports pro-Palestinian causes" I guess they knew better than to call her anti-Semitic on the air and get sued, but lmao how is this possibly a bad thing?? Unless you think brown people = evil as a default, (yeah) it doesn't even make sense Fucking Fox News

Faux News is picking a fight way out of their weight class. Little Johnny and Little Jenny are going to start calling Grandpa a bad man for picking on Ms. Rachel.