Post

Sending this out to whoever needs to see it: It's okay if you read slowly, there's no great victory in being able to read quickly, everyone kind of has their own reading speed, and that's perfectly fine. I'm just really happy you're reading. I hope it gives you joy at any pace. Thank you!

1.1K reposts6.7K likes

Being a relatively quick reader is one of the things which pushes me away from audiobooks and podcasts. Podcasts in particular, as I prefer someone take the time to organize and edit their thoughts before sending them out into the wild.

another side effect is that of the avid readers I know, some have huge vocabularies but mispronounce the words for having only learned them off the page. I tell them not to be embarrassed!

In the early 90s I found a copy of Stanislav Lem's "Sterntagebücher" (Star Diaries) printed in the communist GDR. At the back of the bock was a short dictionary explaining all the technical terms used in the text. Thought that was pretty neat, even if I was enough of a nerd to not need it. 😜

I love when authors do that. And especially when they include pronunciation guides. Helps my enjoyment not having to try and remember how I had a word sound in my head 3 chapters back

Back in the dark ages — 4th grade — I was tagged as being able to read at only half the speed required for success in college. Somehow, I managed to end up with 3 degrees after my name and, according to GoodReads, have read 67 books so far this year. Just chugging along actually works!

What bothers me is not comparison to other people, but comparison to my younger self. As a teen I would take the limit out from the library and almost always finished them all in one borrowing period. As a 50yo I have a thousand unread books in the house I'll probably not live long enough to read.

Same here, but I don't believe my reading speed has changed all that much, it just has become a problem to simply stay in bed and read all day. My boss for example want's me to do boring stuff instead!

100% agree! I love to read but I think everyone should find some quiet time to pick up a book. If you only read one book a year that is great! That's better than not reading any books!

Thank you for this. Working on my first physical read through of LOTR. It's just so much to take in and having to force myself to slow down and ingest everything.

I hate how fast I read. I do not get to enjoy a book over a period of time, I have no ability to savor and build anticipation in the same way I did as a kid. I loved being halfway thru a book, anticipating getting back to reading it soon and the joy of finally picking it up to start…

Having a theater background I read slowly because I’m always imagining speaking the lines and seeing the action in my head. I feel like I enjoy what I read more than people who read fast.

Seconding this. Looking back down my life I think the school emphasis on reading speed more than reading to satisfy curiosity or reading to enjoy a good story...was not a great idea.

You can also read multiple books at a time! Same as you can watch multiple shows through the week. My reading Three Body Problem and Cosmos on alternating weekends has been amazing.

Actually, this is a thing I've worried about for a bit. My BFF is dyslexic and has aphantasia, so has never gotten much out of reading. They stick to movies/tv/video games. But I'm an avid reader, and there are so many great stories I know they would love if they could. Any recommendations?

I love that I read fast, because it means I get to read more things, and it also means that when I'm unable to make time to read, I still get to in bursts. It doesn't make me better, but I am grateful for the knack.

I used to read fast. I'd go through books like water. Then I realized I was missing some things while reading. Not major things but little descriptive things that made the writing more personal or more real. Now I resist the urge to speed through a book and take my time. Much better that way!

I read a lot (on my computer) for my research so don't often read for pleasure because my eyes are tired. But this summer I got glasses for reading up close (not computer screens) and could actually read for pleasure. It took me a month but I really enjoyed, Lock In! Starter Villain is next!

That's another thing I love about settling into a good fiction story, it allows me to slow down. So much of the time, reading all the other stuff everywhere, I speed read. Wild West. Conspicuous consumption. But a good book demands to be savored slowly. It's also OK to listen to books. That counts.

I read at a pretty good pace. But, as I get older, I have the tendency to fall asleep more quickly. I used to stay up for hours reading. Now, after about 10 minutes, I’m asleep.

Did anyone else have the elementary school experience of sitting in a dark room watching a band of light move down text on a screen? IIRC, afterwards, we had to take a reading comprehension quiz. It was an odd and stressful experience.

I was in 3rd grade. Two of us took the machine to its max - 510 words/minute (with 70% comprehension). But it must not have had the desired effect because they only did it for a short time. I've been a fast reader ever since.

Oh, my… I didn’t know slow reading was “a thing”, I just always thought I was “damaged”. When I was a kid and learned to read, I would read to my mother at bedtime and not the other way around. Not sure it’s related, but to this day, many decades later, I still read like I’m reading aloud.

Slow reader for life here. The problem for me is sometimes by brain just wanders off to a tangent in the middle of a page. I'm reading the words but none of it's sticking, so I have to backtrack and read it over. Makes it so I read every book three times the first time through.

I think there is a subconscious peer pressure to be cultured, well-read, and to keep up. That steals the joy of reading altogether. I wish we could marinate in some worlds a bit longer. It took me a month to finish The Dispossessed. I still miss Anarres.

We had “reading bees” in grade school. I, one of seven kids, was always very competitive. Now I must force myself to slow down while reading

I appreciate this sentiment. I read The Shattering Peace on and off again over the span of a few weeks and it felt weird, given your previously stated delivery timelines, that it likely took me longer to read a book than it did for the author to write it.

i’m a natural speed reader (started reading rly young and skipped the “read out loud in your head” step) and ngl I’ve always been jealous of ppl who can read more slowly and deliberately, sometimes plowing through novels in a day or two rly takes the magic out of it

And think of all the money you'll save on books by reading them slowly *Quietly hides my 'to be read' pile behind my other 'to be read' pile*

It’s kind of pathetic that I’m a writer, yet I haven’t picked up a book in years because my eyes are getting worse. This is already on top of ADHD, which has the attention span of a gnat. Then there’s my misophonia, which makes it impossible to listen to audiobooks 😭

I read slowly because, like savouring every mouthful of your favourite food, I like to absorb every sentence and loose myself in the story.

If I connect with a book, I'm likely to read it slowly because it keeps sparking thoughts. My favorite books have a richness of ideas and implications, so I'm not likely to speed through them.

Same advice I gave my father when he kept saying he couldn’t read novels. After getting him to read To Kill A Mockingbird I don’t know how many books he went through.

Reading is not a competition. A book that stays with someone matters more than the number of pages they finish in an hour. We should make reading enjoyable, not turn it into another target.

From what I have seen, the slower you read, the better the experience. When I was young, books became a whole world. Now I can bang them out in one day, but do not remember much a month later.

I was chosen in high school to join some other students in a speed reading program. Years later, I purposefully worked on slowing down so I could savor the reading experience more, and enjoy the writing. I personally don't care how fast or slow you read, as long as you read.

Shelf it and read them all in order. They definitely are a sequence, it’s not like Wodehouse writing dozens of Jeeves and Bertie stories.

Since I’m forced to read ebooks by my libraries I’ve found I consume books slower. I don’t have the attention span for words on a screen. Paper is more… compelling?

I also think it's more important to continue to be curious about authors/subjects/styles with which you're unfamiliar AND to be OK with starting a book or other reading materials and saying, Nope, I am not enjoying this, and putting it aside. Life's very short.

My town’s summer reading program at the library gives points for the minutes read, not the number of books read. That really helped get my kid motivated because even though she started reading slowly, just putting in 15-30 minutes gets rewarded!

100% agree with this for reading done for pleasure. A very small point worth raising, though. In high school, I took a speed-reading course. More out of curiosity than anything; I was already a fast reader. But I did get and retain some good tips on how to read highly technical material 1/3

2/3 faster. And better, in terms of comprehension and retention. It all boils down to "pre-reading". Rather than just plunging into a chapter, first skim it. Focus on things like section headings and the first sentences in set-off paragraphs. Examine illustrations. Have a look

3/3 at questions at the end of the chapter (or sections), if they're there. Really does help. Sadly, this course taught me nothing about writing succinctly.

Most of the “speed” readers I know either miss key points entirely or at least miss out on ruminating over the implications of what they just read. Either way, they clearly don’t get the same depth of experience my slow ass gets.

I read at the same speed as if I was reading aloud to someone, so it takes me forever to get through a book...but I still do it.

Ppl need to understand: fast reading = shallow reading. Bragging about reading “body count” isn’t the flex you think it is. For writers, it’s no bueno. I’m a retired dev ed. I don’t read fast by design: editing requires deep, slow reading. I’m fucking proud to make all the catches nobody else can.

There’s an obnoxious arrogance to bragging on social media about how many books you’ve read this week. If your post has discouraged even one slow reader from picking up a book, shame on you.

I typically read at a moderate pace but taught myself to speed read. My trouble is mild dyslexia, so speed can vary depending on how much my eyes mangle the text. Some fonts & sizes are easier; times new Roman and it’s kin are my defaults.

I *can* read really fast but I realized some years ago that, for pleasure reading, it's not a race. I enjoy myself so much more now that I read slowly and deliberately. Feels like I was leaving so much meat on the bone in the past

i think we're losing something that used to get taught in advanced language arts classes--different kinds of reading. like: skimming, speed reading, reading for pleasure, annotated reading, etc... cause, yeah, i rarely read at my top speed and almost never at my top speed for pleasure.

I read quite quickly - to the point that I will run out of new things that appeal. So then I'll re-read and...I do def remember reading it the first time, but there are also definitely chunks that my brain clearly said "nah, I don't feel like processing that" during the first read.

Were I to read more slowly, I might attain full(er) comprehension in one go, and I might not run out of things to read. Of course, for that second part I also def need to roll the dice on more unknowns...

I can read fast, but find that subtracts from the enjoyment of a good story. You miss the subtle details of scene descriptions or subtext of a conversation. It's like speed running through an art museum and only looking at each painting for 10 seconds.

As an author, who does not listen to audio books himself, it is OK if you read audiobooks for any damn reason under the sun! It is good. Buy my book! Having the story read to you is as old as writing.

Oh man! I used to be afraid to listen to sci fi audiobooks, because I was afraid to miss important details. It turns a good narrator will use tone and emphasis to help me differentiate between details important to the narrative, and details that contribute only to flavor/texture.

I’m currently rereading Neuromancer by William Gibson for the eleventy millionth time, but this time with audio as well as text, and I’m not only retaining it but understanding it better! (I still think 17-y/o me probably wouldn’t understand even with audio, but old me is having a great time)

I first listened to an audiobook alongside reading the text in January, when I had a really long book to finish for my book club meeting. Now I feel like I get an extra layer of meaning out of it. I can feel it reshaping some of my opinions.

They aren't "audiobooks". That's a marketing term to make people feel bette rabout not reading a book. They're audiodramas. It's fine to listen to them! Really! It's just not the same thing as reading. It is fundamentally different neurologically. Stop pretending it's not.

There's an easter egg for audiobook readers in the TV series. A personnel transport ship is approaching a space port (season 2 I think) and when the traffic controller gives docking instructions they call out the ship's name and it's the Jefferson Mays.

I read very quickly. But audiobooks can be “read” while driving, gardening, & working. I’d add “doing chores” but I’ve been known to do the dishes with one hand while turning pages with the other.

A good narrator enhances the story. A bad narrator detracts. But with a decent but not superb reader, I rarely remember whether I read or heard a book. The whole idea of reading books is to forget the medium and be drawn into the material.

For years my job involved handling vast numbers of documents for use in investigations and litigation. Purely as a survival skill I acquired the ability to speed read documents (and even read them upside down). It’s a pain in the butt. It now takes continual active effort for me to read normally.

I read slowly because of time constraints nowadays. Plus my attention span is much shorter than it used to be. Gone are the days of pulling an all-nighter because the book was just THAT GOOD. The book is still THAT GOOD (Your books are THAT GOOD) but I'm lucky to get through a book in a month now.

I read something a little while back that apparently learning to read at speed utilises the same part of the brain that would otherwise be involved in facial recognition. So if you're a fast reader and you're prone to face blindness (*waves*), that might be why

yes . . . but. As John Silber, my freshman Plan II philosophy prof used to say – during the height of the Evelyn Wood Reading Dynamics craze – "Hmmm. Try reading Immanuel Kant quickly."

Yes! A friend is reading some stuff I wrote and keeps apologizing for reading slowly. Like, my man, I’m honored you’re even remotely interested (never mind that he gives the best feedback). It’s not a race! And I read so quickly (ADHD heyyy) I often need to go back. Pace is personal.

Sometimes I can zip through a book in a couple of days. Sometimes life be lifeing and it takes me a couple of weeks. I don't get stressed about it anymore.

whether a slow or fast reader I think instead the important thing is absorbing and understanding. at a younger age I was a fast reader and missed important moments in what I read. I wish everyone a well grok'd reading experience.

One of my favorite literary quotes, from Pride and Prejudice; "The power of doing any thing with quickness is always much prized by the possessor, and often without any attention to the imperfection of the performance."

I used to read so much faster when I was a teenager. I've really slowed down. I wonder how much of that is lacking the focus I used to have, and how much of that is just that I don't have as much time to read anymore so I'm not as practiced at it anymore.

Thank you. I'm a slow reader because I tend to read and re-read passages so I can get every nuance. I don't want to miss anything. I often feel like, as a writer, I should be reading *faster* and tend to beat myself up about it.

I had a classmate in college give a speech about how difficult it is to give a speech with a stutter. How difficult it is to keep people engaged because they can’t seem to wait for the words to come out. Always skipping ahead while pretending they were listening to him. People are way too impatient

my weird thing is that my reading pace is entirely dependent on the type of text. I’ll blast through one of your OMW books in two days, but if I’m reading a drier, more academic topic I have to force feed myself a chapter per day

The only thing that makes me sad about being a slow reader is that I can basically never agree to reading other people's stuff for blurbs because I just won't get through it in time.

Audiobooks give me more flexibility than reading. Just finished the 2nd volume (580 pages/24hrs) of a very popular trilogy listening at 1.8 to 2.0 speed. It ‘s well written, but IMO overstuffed & needs editing. 2x got me through digressions. OTH, I listen to books I enjoy at 1.2-1.3x to savor them.

I don't know if this helps, but I've never bought a book based on a promotional cover blurb, even if it's provided by a writer whose work I like. I rely much more on downloadable samples these days, but even in the old days, not much of a blurb follower.

Sometime wish I was a slower reader. The books are over way to quickly! 😁 Seriously, nothing wrong with reading at your own speed, the important thing is to enjoy it!

On Goodreads my goal is 12 books a year. I'm breezing through "When the Moon Hits Your Eye" by some guy name Scalzi, but if start in on a Dickens novel it can take me a month or longer.

for me, i blame my head injury in my ability to read. it’s not that i now can’t, but more it doesn’t absorb into understanding what is getting said. it makes me read not only slower, but the same thing multiple times to get the understanding behind what is actually said on the page

I’m a doubly-slow reader, A) because I naturally read slowly to chew over the sounds and meaning of words and sentences, and B) I stop so much to contemplate, make notes, or because of distractions.

Same. And my wife also remembers the story and characters better, catching nuance and specifics I miss. I can hear my kindle sigh when recalculates the reading speed. Kindle: 4 hours and 20 minutes left. Kindle later: 5 hours and 35 minutes left. Kindle even later: Sigh. Yawn. Maybe never...

100% this. I read quickly but then I need to sit with the book for at least a week or two to process it, and I think it's OK. I read because I enjoy it, not to compete with others.

For myself I'd say there's a distinction between the joy of diving into a (hopefully) good story and consuming it for the ride, and reading to retain information. I generally only hang onto books I feel worth re-reading. Still a *lot* of books. Currently re-reading (for 3rd? time) W. Gibson

I'm a fast reader in Hebrew, but a rather slow one in English, which is quite frustrating. And since The Collapsing Empire has been the only Interdependency title translated thus far, finishing The Consuming Fire is going to take so, so long [but I'm up for the task]