sorry, if you want social media to be less toxic, you are obligated to be all in favor of food posts, which are objectively way less toxic than the vast majority of other topics
166 reposts1.6K likes
sorry, if you want social media to be less toxic, you are obligated to be all in favor of food posts, which are objectively way less toxic than the vast majority of other topics
166 reposts1.6K likes
I can live with being all for foodposts only because I don’t consider what @jongraywb.blacksky.app posts to be food.
I hope you follow @swordsjew.bsky.social and their series on great sandwiches of the world!
When I go on the 'What's Cooking' feed, I genuinely like the range of stuff. It wouldn't be half as human and enjoyable if all the posts were beautifully photographed pictures of the fanciest and most elegant food. That there are also blurry photos of the soup someone liked is integral to the charm.
this. i think food as a topic is almost inherently less toxic because, unlike politics, at the end of the day it doesn't really matter what anybody else does for dinner... and from that flows even the arguments i've seen about food tending to be more lighthearted. "best potato chip" isn't important.
See that's a perfect example of when I pretend to get outraged. bsky.app/profile/joeh...
I'm routinely pretend to be serious about food discourse (eg. pretend outrage about favorites made the wrong way) but even *I* know better than to actually get mad about food preferences.
I mean, I guess at least they're self-aware enough to realize this is a surprising list: bsky.app/profile/sri....
you can also listen to @deliciouslegacy.bsky.social, a terrific podcast Faine turned me on to
My wife @erinyes.eurosky.social made the most amazing chili today. My mouth was very happy!
idk I saw some insane comments under some food pics @peark.es took