Post

Newsletter: I am sick and god damn tired of everybody pretending that generative AI is the next big thing. The media is complicit in accepting fantastical nonsense - both in the numbers put out by OpenAI and the silly jobs created by Anthropic - and it has to stop. www.wheresyoured.at/reality-check/

wheresyoured.atReality CheckI'm sick and god-damn tired of this! I have written tens of thousands of words about this and still, to this day, people are babbling about the "AI revolution" as the sky rains blood and crevices open...

1K reposts4.1K likes

Whether OpenAI will be profitable is up for debate. Whether LLMs are very powerful and useful technology is not

Jase Gehring@skyjase.bsky.social

i am a scientist and LLMs are very useful for my work do i trust what they say? no! i trust them less than the average paper i read. i use caution, experience, and judgment as a biologist creating new knowledge, i'm comfortable working with incomplete and inaccurate information

"There are no other hypergrowth markets left in tech." Maybe not right now, but when the AI bubble is over they'll just go and get excited about something else. I'm not even sure they have a choice.

I think a lot of the SV companies don't acknowledge that a lot of what allowed the hypergrowth markets were the conditions of the post-2008 crash. Interest was low, and [Democratic] regulators did not get in the way of all the issues because they offered growth and GDP increases in a rough time

Every earnings call for every business seems to feature some attempt to inflate valuation using 'AI solutions' even when it's just run of the mill automation. I'm not sure how bad a bubble burst might be. I was a kid when dotcom hit so I don't have a real reference.

I just want to say thank you for writing such a clear and concise, comprehensive explanation of all the things I've been so angry about ever since this grift began. It was refreshing as hell to see facts and righteous anger combined into an absolutely damning expose of it all.

“There are no other hypergrowth markets left in tech.” the VC shops (that actually had good returns) closed up just before cloud craze as the writing was on the wall already :^)

Hello, everyone, it's me, Kevin Roose, with some wondr'ous AI news! If you want to know which AI has the juice, hop aboard my Roose Caboose! Roose then tugs on the fake beard he is wearing and it makes a sound like a train whistle.

This is, hands down, the best thing I have ever read about the AI industry. I've been thinking about "AI" in one form or another for 25 years, and I feel like I've been gaslit constantly for most of the last 8. I made this in 2019 to reflect my thoughts at the time. If I made it today, I would...

... find a way to add some money to the image. And while money has certainly always been the point (every business needs Rev>Exp eventually), what has become super clear in the last two years is that money is the cause of our absurd AI moment. Specifically, too MUCH money has turned Silicon

Valley - maybe the whole tech industry - into a Black Mirror version of The Emperor's New Clothes. Now, a lot of influential people desperately *need* it to be true. A whole lot of manifesting going on. As it has done before, the industry built on hope. At some point, awash in $, hope became a lie.

On the cost of inference going down: LLMs seem to have hit a wall in terms of what they can learn (they are already trained on the whole internet). If we move to models which are capable of learning as they go, then inference and learning become entwined and the cost will sky-rocket.

Welcome to the economy of companies that can't turn a profit but are valued at astronomical valuations. We need more leaders/managers who can add value to customers while making a profit for their organization. If this disjointed economy continues, we are in for a rude awakening, circa 2008.

Yes, and no! I was on the OpenAI private beta, prototyping RAG, tuned to their ethical standards, and OK'd for launch. Then they launched. Out went the ethics at the first whiff of cash, and in came a second AI winter of distrust for independents like myself, for whom now spare a thought!

I think this is an excellent microcosm of the problems in modern journalism all over. It used to be that a journalist would research an issue, then report on the truth of the matter to their readers. Now in an endless obsession with "appearing neutral" they just ask for a statement and publish it.

So you get headlines like "RFK says measels vaccine is ineffective", and then the article is just stenography of comments he made. MAYBE if you're lucky, an expert in the 2nd last paragraph says it's wrong, but even then the article won't take a side. Just platforming bullshit as if its news.

I reckon agents could be a huge revenue source. If users are willing to install a closed source application that they give full permission to access all their data and bank accounts I can think of a way that could make a lot of money very quickly, no LLM required, except as window dressing.

If any other company said that not only do they anticipate doubling their revenue exponentially every year for the next five years, but their financials depend on such fairy tale performance just to make them solvent and justify their valuation, they would be laughed out of any boardroom.

For comparison, Apple's revenue bumped from 20b in 2006 to 26b in 2007 then 34b in 2008. Almost doubling in two years on the back of releasing the FUCKING IPHONE in 2007. This was a meteoric rise the likes of which many companies could only dream.

That chart is bonkers. Their revenue is going to triple this year (and then double the next year?) I accept, reluctantly, that there ARE people out there who actually want to use this stuff. But aren't most of them already using it?

Is there a German compound word for when your own niche interest gets covered by the media and they completely fuck it up and you say to yourself, "Hold up- if they're that dumb about this, what about... Oh no, oh no, no, no"? Asking for a friend.

All of the useful "AI" used to be called "machine learning" a couple of years ago. And yeah it's going to stick around because it's actually valuable for specialised jobs and not just a statistical text generation engine that people push into all sorts of things that it's not remotely suitable for!

Exactly. It’s useful in the same way all the self-driving car tech is useful, in that it’s good R&D that has some practical applications now, and future applications, but was not worth a gazillion dollars in 2018 based on us all having autonomous vehicles by 2025.

I feel like there's still a distinction there. Sensors, object recognition and predictive path finding *could* solve the self-driving problem. They're just stupidly optimistic with when. "Stringing words together based on likely occurrences" only solves "create plausible but often wrong text"

It’s time to stop referring to google, Meta, OpenAI, etc. as the tech industry. The tech industry is the companies that build software for banks, airlines, law firms, restaurants, whatever. Tech for tech sake is not the tech industry.

We need to talk about how stupid those Salesforce ads are. It hurts my brain that they think every inconvenience could be solved with AI slop.

Worse than that, every theoretical inconvenience they show in those commercials is caused by AI messing up and everyone just going along with it anyway, including McConaughey. They never even attempt to make an argument against just not using AI at all.

"The ER didn't get me in to see the right specialist, now I'm waiting forever" Man, that is not what an ER does. And have you been to a hospital or seen the state of healthcare in the US? AI ain't fixing all that.

Still curious why if people are so thoroughly tired of OpenAI's shit that they don't set up a server farm asking ChatGPT to paint pictures of chinese arithmetic while naming every NBC television show in alphabetical order until the whole operation bankrupts OpenAI from power draw

A very prominent and otherwise smart tech reporter/podcaster guy said on Friday that maybe Open AI will end up buying the Chrome browser from Google because they "have the money" and my eyes rolled into the back of my skull straight to another dimension.

I... Am not sure if I want to lift the blanket on how OpenAI is going to do advertising and product recommendations with ChatGPT, but that seems to be the plan. My guess is they'll mine prompts and sell eyeballs to advertisers based on prompt content, but that's just a guess.

...Which, if they do, they will further degrade a service that is of questionable utility. Search is actually useful, and the destruction of search is shameful. But to degrade the experience for a thing that people already don't trust is just... It's definitely something.

Adding, as a resident of Utah and one who has morbid interest in MLMs and other, uh, "interesting" businesses I have to at least kind of admire how much OpenAI is able to raise money off of hot air.

I have only just started reading this and I'm already getting Enron vibes. Looking forward to reading the rest. Thank you for breaking things down like this, I don't know enough about tech or finances myself to articulate why it seems like such a scam.

It will be like Internet sites in the eraly 2000s and virtual worlds, it's going to go through a heavy winter and down cycle. Awful lot of money burned on nonsense.

All the alumnis from OpenAi set up “AI” companies, without a single product, single problem solved, not a single dollar made, they drop in “AI” or “machine” or “inteligence” into their name and are valued immidiatelly as multibillion dollar companies? wtf, make it make sense to me.

Venture Capitalists are often tech bros who got very lucky without being as smart as they think, they have nothing to do except listen to flim-flam artists, and they are herd animals all chasing what they heard someone talk about at parties. Of course they run things, we are screwed.

This is exactly how I feel and exactly what first got me reading your newsletter. If not for folks like you and my equally tired friends I'd think I'm going insane and somehow missed the so-called-AI so-called-Revolution.

That’s how I felt today when wired posted an article about how an “acclaimed” book no one’s heard of was written by ai, and then in the article the author of the book (an Italian philosophy teacher pretending to be Chinese) says ai didn’t write it. And then the article just continues on as if it did

Anybody who takes the words of someone like Sam Altman at face value and prints whatever he wants to be said should ask themselves why they are doing so when they're simultaneously obviously lying to everybody about AGI being imminent. Don't be the guy taking FSDs imminent release seriously in 2016.

Of course everyone looks back at Musk's lies from a decade ago an laughs, but FSD was by comparison a much much much more believable lie than the one they're swallowing whole at this very moment.

Yeah, at the time I could train a simplified FSD model that could handle limited environments on pretty basic hardware and run models on an RC car. The main hurdle appeared to be edge cases and liability questions. AGI doesn't have any demo and can't run models on desktop hardware realistically.

Much like the dotcom bubble in that the technology is very real but the hype has been monetized into wildly unrealistic promises. Hopefully, this buries the SV VC cult, and the people actually building something can get back to doing the work.

A real answer. Deepseek wouldn't be profitable either. It would be cheaper, but even at the significantly reduced costs people just don't want to pay to use AI as it is right now. That's when their models all include a bunch of uninvented tech that will save them and assumes endless improvement.

Friend of mine is an academic AI researcher. I remember when Neural Nets started becoming big, a few years ago, I asked him about them and he sniffed and said "oh, that's an old model. We just didn't have the processing power for it before."

Thing is the underlying tech is a decent advancement in the ability to process data. If the industry had just been honest about it, everyone involved would get a pat on the back and we could have enjoyed some modest performance improvements and new features. But they had to say they invented god.

Deepseek offers the same output as other AI tools, but the real value of AI shouldn't just be lower production costs—it should be about replicating human thought.

I don't think this style of AI can do that. But Ed's main point is that AI isn't profitable, OpenAI loses money with every single query, even from paid customers. Deepseek's costs are a lot lower, so why isn't OpenAI copying their methods?

The fact that Sam Altman uses vocal fry like Elizabeth Holmes tells you all you need to know about Sam Altman and any company he is attached to. I mean, if the guy lies about his own voice then you really don't want to buy anything he sells because its all woo-woo snake oil bollocks.

I appreciate all the work that you've put into these last few newsletters. I agree with you regarding the sketchy plan to increase revenue with "new products"; however, what do you make of "monetizing free users"? Couldn't they make a ton of money simply forcing college students to pay for homework?

i think they will actually make whatever money there is to be made there by having free users' llm girlfriends slide sponsored biases into the output (if they aren't already doing this, which they probably are)

Of course, but ChatGPT is by far the most popular with the smoothest interface. I would think most college students would pay $10 a month to get the Spotify version of a homework machine? Definitely not an AI evangelist (I'm an English Lecturer)--I've just never seen this addressed.

I think they just plan on polluting their stupid llm with sponsored content. They saw the hallucinations and said "we can monetize that". They're speedrunning entshittification.

Casey Newton@caseynewton.bsky.social

OpenAI says that these are organic recommendations rather than paid ones, but I can't imagine that state of affairs will hold

Totally agree on Google’s decline. What often gets overlooked: it’s not just bad internal decisions and ads — SEO and fake reviews have been poisoning Search for years. LLMs will face the same fate, just faster.