Post

Genuinely an insane paragraph from Sam Alito. “Voter fraud is real and scary and we have to stop it, so the fact that implementing Trump’s mail ballot rule will disenfranchise millions is legally irrelevant.” Brain melted. A right-wing podcaster in a robe. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

1.2K reposts4.6K likes

This is a wild misapplication of the test for a stay, sure, but it’s also just disconnected from how the real world works. In Alito’s mind, the only factor for determining whether something is legal is “Does Mister Trump want it.” A little bobblehead for fascism. Vile, stupid, get out of my face.

im utterly obsessed with how he acknoweldged one party in the balance of the equities analysis with a nice “duly noted” and then just utterly disregard it

When Alito writes "the Executive's goals" he's adopting Trump's POV Which is "I Trump am always already simultaneously the king of kings and the True Victim" That that's anti-constitutional doesn't seem to bother Alito at all

Samuel Alito is anti-democracy, a fascist, a major threat to our country and needs to be dealt with. Dealt with as in the Surpreme Court needs to have more judges on it, he needs to be impeached from the court, or there needs to be term limits. Democrats-this is the first thing we need to do.

Alito and Thomas need to be removed as quickly as possible from SCOTU for it to have any chance of regaining legitimacy. For two such corrupt individuals to be on a Supreme Court anywhere, let alone the country claiming to be the land of the free is a sick joke.

If clarence and sam retired at the beginning of taco's 2nd term, we'd have two new younger uber corrupt judges who fail to abide by the rule of law. Not so sure he'd have the votes now. Having a glass half full kinda day.

Alito and Thomas (and their very nutty wives) are full-fledged members of the MAGA treason cult They HATE democracy and LOVE child-rape, so they are ALL IN for Daddy Trump

Alito is basically a man standing on the street corner with food in his hair shouting at passing cars about voting machines. Making him a Supreme Court justice was like going up to the man on the corner and saying, “Hey, would you watch my kids while I’m away for the weekend?”

I am not an expert here, but even if some level of voter fraud was real (I know it’s not), wouldn’t the solution need to be more narrowly tailored than “throw out entire batches of thousands of votes because we found one problematic one”?

When a supreme court justice says that disenfranchising millions of voters is legally irrelevant, he is telling us that democracy is legally irrelevant. Impeach him.

Nevermind that every time the claims of the 2020 election being “stolen” have been investigated, It’s been proven unfounded, Trump has a history of lying about these things, and did an insurrection. This is bulldozing the bank incase someone might rob it.

US voter fraud is 0000845% and no election outcome in the US has ever been altered by ballot fraud. bsky.app/profile/jayw...

Jay Willis@jaywillis.net

Genuinely an insane paragraph from Sam Alito. “Voter fraud is real and scary and we have to stop it, so the fact that implementing Trump’s mail ballot rule will disenfranchise millions is legally irrelevant.” Brain melted. A right-wing podcaster in a robe. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

I don't think I realized until Trump became president how truly nuts Alito is. At least Thomas has the good sense to keep quiet most of the time.

If Alito would like to accompany me to a polling place he can see for himself that THERE IS NO VOTER FRAUD. But that would disrupt little Sammy’s preconceived notions. Poor baby.

My late cousin, C.J. Warren Burger must be cheering from his grave. I’m pretty sure I can hear him. He made Richard Nixon turn over the tapes…he could not abide by a dishonorable President. You should take a lesson from his legacy.

The 2nd Amendment is sacrosanct, no matter how many children are killed by guns. But the flimsiest claim of nonexistent voter fraud is enough to wreck elections whenever that guy we gave immunity says so.

As if there can never be fraud with in person voting. Ever heard of boxes of ballots found in car trunks? Polling stations being closed or moved? Who will have the right to determine someone’s ID doesn’t look like them or looks fake?

Alito and Thomas are terrified at a failed coup. As they should be. They are the must corrupt members of the court - and that’s saying something.

These folks can’t help displaying just how unfit they are. Alito and Thomas are complete embarrassments and clearly pro fascism. #Unfir4Office Putting this stuff in writing makes clear that there is no pretense at protecting democracy. #JudicialReform

The brain has been melted for around 100 million Americans. And the melt will continue if the billionaires continue to have their way with tech and media.

And Sam’s all huffy because the states cited a “highly technical” part of the Postal Reorganization Act? What would he like the states to use, a McDonald’s menu? I begin to think we need to start labelling laws as “Important, everybody must follow”, “only matters to the other party” or “tl:dr”.

And then you’ll slowly finish your drink. And order another. And finish that one. And the waiter with the evidence you ordered still hasn’t shown up—where the hell is he anyway?!?

It never matters to him that the postal service has no authority to do any of this. Their job is to deliver mail. More to the point: If they *interfere* with the mail in any way, they are committing a crime. Plus, people exhibiting such severe delusions should be immediately removed from office.

My favorite was after 2020 when Republicans were saying - "Well, no need to go into the particulars - many voters are concerned about the legitimacy of our elections." And they kept harping on this but not getting to the core point -

Yeah, the whole game is to seed distrust in the public by lying about election fraud and then use that distrust as evidence supporting voter suppression laws. And meanwhile, voter fraud remains vanishingly rare because it's a *felony charge* for *zero gain*.

The Government has no legitimate interest in implementing the rule. This is obviously a case where the "remedy" is worse than the problem it purports to address. When added to the unconstitutionality of the order, there is absolutely no basis for Alito's opinion.

To catch a handful of fraudulent voters (who would probably be caught through existing processes), Alito and his MAGA allies would keep millions of legal voters from casting ballots. In what representative democracy does this stance make sense?

The CORRUPTION on the SCOTUS is REAL & SCARY!! The justices are supposed to be UPHOLDING the CONSTITUTION , instead they are TRAMPLING all over it for ILLEGAL Implementations of a LUNATIC, supported by the GREED of BILLIONAIRES! They accept gifts & vacations from billionaires to vote in their favor!

Not insane he’s been abhorrent since he was placed in a SC robe, maybe even before. He’s as narcissistic and corrupt as Trump. Perhaps alongside Roberts each has felt embolden to choose between their respective interests versus the country’s. It wouldn’t be the first time.

Justices shouldn't be allowed to sequester themselves within right wing silos/propaganda. Some info vetting process to ensure they are credibly informed is crucial.

Vote in the midterms like you assume 2 SCOTUS justices might retire, so trump can appoint two more, younger, even farther right radical partisan judges, and only democrats can block it.

The radical right has been playing the long game for 40 years. Republicans get out and vote in huge numbers even for GOP candidates they don’t like and even for midterms & state and local elections. They know it affects SCOTUS

Alito would disenfranchise a million legitimate votes that could determine the difference of an election outcome to 'perhaps' stop one illegitimate vote that would have no bearing on an election just to placate fear mongering MAGAts who see this as a pathway to steal elections.

This is stunning… it is not an argument on the constitutionality. It is not an argument regarding the law or precedent. It is that he sees something that needs to be law… he is creating law. Even Scalia would be appalled.

Clearly this zero tolerance concept means Christianity must be banned, if for no other reason than to dissuade evildoers from using its legitimacy to justify evil acts. Statistically irrelevant on the whole, but troubling nonetheless.

remind me how many rules the SC is letting DT break again. I guess I should qualify that as those not in his official capacity as President, because in that regard, the answer is "all of them".

And yet they also change the rules all the time — some things shouldn’t be touched too close to an election because of how disruptive they’ll be, but if they are things that support what they want, then that standard doesn’t apply. They’re so full of shit.

The guy who couldn’t find evidence of racism so he voted to gut the voting rights act is now convinced there’s rampant voter fraud and he’s more than willing to take away your right to vote in an effort to fight it. “Irony is the first casualty of conservatism” Bill Hicks