Post

I don't love it either, but I'm not sure how you tell a man that he should let his only surviving son rot in prison to respect norms, institutions, and the rule of law, when the country you devoted your life to serving just pretty comprehensively voted they don't give a shit about any of that.

653 reposts3.2K likes

Hunter Biden was clearly targeted for fully political reasons. The entirety of his 'crimes' were laughable compared to the third worst crime Trump committed just last month and are tied mostly to chemical-using behavior. I've little patience for any hand-wringing or pearl-clutching over this.

One of the problems is for the voters who voted for Trump because they think they're all the same and at least he might make them richer. It cements the "they're all the same" part. It's a theme pushed by the right and probably Russia, because it benefits them.

They voted that way while Hunter was in prison. It clearly didn't make a difference. The only thing people remembered from the four years of Trump administration is that prices at Walmart were slightly lower and that he was meaner to immigrants. Can we not invent an electorate that doesn't exist?

You don't think there is a section of voters who found it easier to vote Trump because of their own perceived interests and "all politicians are bad"? Not suggesting it's what swayed things, but this action makes that idea easier to push. Your financial point seems to be much the same as mine.

I've seen ppl get 30 yrs Federal probation in N.M. for meth manufacturing & guns. I was surprised because I'd always heard of " mandatory sentencing guidelines " So he could have gotten probation but why take a chance with the motley crue of weirdos about to take over.

I suppose if it was me I'd say if the American people are prepared to forgive Trump for his mistakes then I'm sure they'll forgive me for forgiving my son... What would Jesus do? He was a maverick...

They might not give a shit but - through his actions- neither does he. The rule of law needs to be bolstered, not further undermined. He sacrificed his integrity and his legacy for his son. It might be human but it's not very wise and it's politically illiterate.

We get it, yes. But some of us feel heartbroken all over again. No reason why Biden should be heroic in the face of such an outcome. Yet some people are. My first reaction was: now Trump has truly won and decency is truly dead. I am wrong though, because people like Alexei Navalny exist(ed).

100% correct. I’d go further and ensure you get your kid out asap to a left leaning democracy somewhere. Portugal is nice and has a golden visa. I’m not sure the whole double jeopardy thing would remain if it suited them

I love it. America doesn’t care about truth and honesty. Here’s a little taste from our side. Joe did the right thing. I would have been disappointed if he hadn’t.

By doing this he is acknowledging that justice will be capricious and at the whim of the executive. If he thought that this action would make things worse by emboldening the next administration he wouldn't do it. Things can't get worse.

Spot on. Trump is sending a convicted fraudster and a blackmailer as his Ambassador to France. The pearl clutching is ridiculous, given the cabal of crooks, sex offenders and weirdos the USA has voted into power.

literally the next president is a convicted criminal and he ahs been given virtual pardon by DOJ and SCOTUS, strange in the pearl clutching this morning not seeing this mentioned, jeez the US and it's reporting is so screwed up

I have no sympathy, Biden in not only pardoning his son but saying his prosecution was politically motivated has now ensured that Trump will release the Jan 6 insurrectionists who tried and nearly did destroy US democracy.

Think people forget that Trump really could have one the 2020 election if he hadn't been so mad over his COVID response. The American public didn't really care about his scandals or corruption just the fact he'd let a virus run rampant through them.

And even then more because it trapped them at their homes and stopped the economy. Not so much from a public health view. (Aware not all Americans but the ones who swung the election to Biden)

I don't agree with what he's done but I can't blame him either. I think that's what Dmitry's getting at too. Why sacrifice your son on an altar of ethics that the nation has already burned to the ground? There's no apostle to write a gospel about you.

I was talking with my wife about this & we struggled to pinpoint when it passed. We think that the 2000 election with SCOTUS handing the presidency to Bush was arguably the point that laws became optional & the ‘nation of laws not men’ ended.

people forget what an absolutely pivotal election 2000 was. and yes, it was brazen. but then, once you've decided that it's ok to have politically biased, partisan appointed judges then... where else is that going to lead

It's not about what the country voted for: it's what each person stands for. If Hunter was convicted according to due process then he should serve his time, the same as anyone else. All Biden has shown here is his own corruption and openness to abuse of power. And enabled Trump's future abuses.

No, there is no "separation of powers" when it comes to pardons. The president has the exclusive power to pardon whoever he wants, for any reason. Period. Always has. Neither Congress nor the Supreme Court has any oversight. You are recycling talking points that have no relevance here.

What ‘each person stands for’ couldn’t really be better reflected than by the way the majority vote. But applying the term ‘corrupt’ to anything that Biden has done here, or before, really requires quite a lot of scrutiny.

You have to assume due process. If you don't, then you accept Trump's corruption as the normal, natural and proper state of things. I have no illusions about Trump but how do Democrats hold him accountable if they adopt his methods? And where does that leave America either way?

Besides, in accepting the pardon, Hunter Biden by definition accepts the guilt of his conviction, even leaving aside the ongoing tax investigations (which have continued all through his father's term as president so presumably aren't entirely politically motivated).

If you don't understand that politics is a percentage game then you don't understand it at all. But I can tell you what I expect him to try to do, which is to adopt Putin's practices in Russia, in America. The US is fortunate that Trump is squeamish about violence. Maybe his successor won't be.

It's a dreadful look for Biden. But really do you think Trump would stop and say "what would Joe do? " nope you're right I won't pardon myself, that'd be wrong and immoral and corrupt and an abuse of power and set a bad example and unjust.... you get the picture.

It's not about what Trump would do; it's about how Americans see presidential standards. Biden is normalising Trump's behaviour. Sure Trump will give more, and worse, pardons. He already has. But his defenders will always point to this as a shield now.

It's still wrong I do agree. But from what I've seen the behaviour of a predecessor or the decision of a court is viewed as "politically motivated" and devalued. It doesn't matter as the states is now a bipartisan with very few undecided left to frown and punish the worst of two.

Jo Biden should never have been put in this position in the 1st place. Not excusing Hunter Biden, but his 'crimes' were against himself. Agent Orange's crimes have been against individuals, the nation and by extension the world. In any other county, Agent Orange would be in jail for high treason.

I really hope that Biden resigns just before Christmas and appoints Kamala as President. Best Christmas present for the planet and the eff you to Trump would be large enough to be seen from space.

Disastrous how? Spell it out for me. The public just voted for a guy running on the explicit promise he is going to pardon himself and the goons who stormed the capital on January 6th. What intact norm has Biden weakened here?

What really disappoints me is Biden's messaging. He could have been human about it but he cast aspersions over the conviction. THAT is where he really sank to Trump's level. Trump would throw anyone, including his kids, under any passing bus to save his own skin.

When you consider that Trump is very likely to pardon a load of Jan 6 yobs, it's hard to be hard on JB even though he's ceding the moral high ground in the eyes of many. Imagine watching those people go free having left your kid to rot though.

MAGATS will never appreciate what Biden has done for this country and they won't give him any kudos for "doing the right thing" When they go low we go high didn't get us anywhere. I'm glad he pardoned Hunter

If they’re really bothered by the whole presidential pardon thing they’ll have the power to change it, unless it’s just the democrats using it that upsets them.

It's rank hypocrisy isn't it. But I agree with you. Overnight the rule book went out the window, you can sit there and make an example of your son to prove your piety, or say stuff you then and do what he did.

I don't think Biden is quite the paragon of uprightness that is often projected by his inner circle. His wider actions show someone whose judgment is inconsistent, and in this case, I think pardoning his son is influenced by anger at the Democratic party. IMO.

Because the law should apply equally to everybody and not be down to the whims of one person. There are plenty of fathers who would love to pardon their sons but aren't president so their kids sit in jail while Biden's walks free. Pardons are unjust and easily open to corruption.

Two wrongs don't make a right though, and just waving a white flag and saying "oh well, country's going to hell anyway" doesn't seem the best course of action to me. There will be future elections, people will remember this, and use this as an example of hypocrisy.

Doing the morally right thing has been disastrous for Democrats. In the face of a Trump presidency that comes with a promise of retribution for every perceived slight against him, if I were Biden I'd pardon everyone whose name I could remember.

"People that are consistently hypocritical will in the future accuse you of hypocrisy" Ultimately, so what? The left have to learn that tying your hands behind your back in the name of norms for fear that your opponent - who's just reached for a bat - will accuse you of breaking the rules, is nuts.

Where does it end though? If no-one stands up for what is the right thing to do, how do you ever get back to that position and expect normal people to abide by the rules?

The fct that they elected Trump shows that enough people clearly DON'T remember stuff like that. Or at least not enough to not vote for a despicable & immoral person as their president. Trump's picks for his cabinet shows he doesn't give a fig about norms, checks, laws. His supporters agree.

Not unusual though, presidents can theoretically do this in many countries. In the UK the sovereign can do the same "on advice of ministers" which means in practice the PM can do what they like. Only reason they usually prefer to ask parliament to vote is political. They don't have to.

It's rare, and in practice the PM has the power not the royals. But the Alan Turing and Steven Gallant pardons both went through this route. Wikipedia lists 50 other recipients, idk how complete the list is.

The amount of suffering a vindictive Trump DOJ would have inflicted on an incarcerated Hunter Biden would have vastly outstripped any of the crimes he committed. Biden did the right thing here. I believe he would not have pardoned him if any other Republican had been elected.

Literally being between a rock & a hard place. I love how many are saying “The Dems are being too nice… they need to fight back… play the same game… play harder” blah blah & then Biden does this & it’s back on the Moral High Ground we go. I’m centre left but this is just becoming so tedious

You can't out-nasty tramp.. And if you did, you'd actually be worse than him,, and also not fit for office. Doing this just weakens any objections to his behaviour

You're right - so I guess I'm just stuck on "if we were going to stop playing by idiotic rules the other side hasn't followed in years, couldn't we have done it sooner and on more meaningful subjects?"

I mean, I think it's reasonable to ask him not to do this before the election in which the Democrats are running on "do not elect the openly corrupt oligarchs". Once America has said, "no, we love that actually..."

I think the difference here is that you don't think that'll change, and I wonder if it will. (That said, I've also for years wanted the Dems to abandon the game given that the GOP isn't playing it anymore - so mostly just sighing at this being as far as they've gone.)

(And, to be honest, if the Democrats were finally ready to also stop playing by rules that the GOP doesn't follow anymore, I wish it would have been over something more meaningful than Hunter Biden.)

No, This was a father and son thing, not a democrat thing. Also no rules broken. I don't agree with Ford's decision to pardon Nixon but he was not breaking the rule of law. if you don't play by the rules you aren't a Democrat.

I think when you're the president, there are no such things as "father and son" things, and the problem is the spin on using the rules - I know presidential pardons are legal but they sure look wholly suspect when you apply them to your family. A "but this is legal!" line is going to get crucified.

It may also be the best way to spare Hunter Biden whatever medieval-level retribution the incoming administration plans to crush him with. It’s not the right thing to do, but it was probably the only thing that could be done.

Yeah, it's fair. I'm with Dmitry - I don't hate it or love it, it just leaves me despondent and going "couldn't you have gotten to this point re packing the courts?"

Jack Smith literally just folded up his investigation into Trump under the pretense of "hey, what's the point?" Trump got bailed out by so many of our institutions, it's laughable to compare Biden's child getting one to him.

That is a good point. And according to some big US posters on here and Twitter Kash Patel, Trump's candidate to run the FBI, has for the last 4 years talked about sending Hunter Biden to prison. And the Trumps have done similar. So yeah, can't say I blame him.

As an individual I get it but as a supposed leader you set the example. There's Twain/Captain America quote basically says when you know something's right you should stand by it, regardless of what anyone else says. Be the change you want to see or just be better would be another way to put it.

If it was any other person dragged to the mud publicly, investigated for years partly base on stolen or fabricated evidence, indicted for something almost nobody else ever is, and denied a plea deal b/c the prosecutor was threatened by members of Congress would you say POTUS should pardon them?

I'm not American so I don't know the ins and outs / what evidence there is, but on the surface level if he's innocent then there is no need to pardon him. And if he's guilty he should be charged. Makes no difference who he is, or it shouldn't at least.

He isn't innocent. The issue is that what he did - paying taxes too late and lying about drug use when purchasing a gun - is so widespread that's never charged on its own. And if someone did get charged he'd plead guilty and get a fine and some community work.

That is the literally point being made above - the way he was treated in this case was precisely because of who he was. And if he had been treated like any other citizen, he wouldn’t have been going to prison in the first place.

Biden is just lucky he can even make the call to spend the rest of his life with his son, provided his life is shorter than 4 years. The push to put Hunter into prison will never stop.

This is a shame, but completely true as well. I don't think anyone should have this power and theorange one will justify using this to death. He would do it anyway, now he can claim it's justified