Post

trying to help a Hinge match understand that a digital copy of their brain being uploaded doesn't mean they're immortal now because they don't "get" to be the copy and their meat body will still die someday and really understanding why Catherine just gave up trying to explain that to Simon in SOMA

265 reposts2.9K likes

I can imagine how to some people it is important that the world has one of "them" around, even if that one is not actually them. Like they are God's gift to the universe. I wonder what fragile copy it would be without our physical reality. Living with pain affects my personality. As does pleasure.

It always felt like it would have been so easy to fudge this too imo, like ‘The transporter opens a tiny wormhole directly on your exact location with the exit inside the transporter bay, moves it down your body and then closes it once you’ve gone fully through.’ But they insist on The Disintegrator

I feel like that one should make it easy to understand: you get ripped apart at a molecular level (which kills you, you are now dead) and then reconstituted (read: copied) in a different location. It’s like a fax machine if fax machines burned the original copy. The copy is not the original

Ah, tbh I’m a very inconsistent ST viewer, there’s a lot of handwavium I’m not up on. That sounds like hardcore cope from the writers though so they wouldn’t have to deal with all the ramifications of transporter technology that TOS didn’t think through very well

I happen to think the nature of consiouness is probably some form of quantum entanglement. what we've described as the soul could be whatever the other end of that particle pair is harmony and stability in the link between the two, and likewise with disharmony might explain how one has an inner self

I mean they're immortal in a sense, but not so you'd really notice. They'll get instanced like a videogame NPC, and while the instances as a whole will go on forever, individual instances will get deleted in a fairly short time. They live forever, but they also die every five minutes

Like think about what happens when you load your quicksave in a videogame. Not to YOU. What happens to the NPCs. To the people who AREN'T you. How do they experience you reloading a save. Do they experience anything at all

David Brin plays around with this a bit in Kiln People, where you can make copies of yourself to do chores for you. At the end, you reupload their experience into your own consciousness. Or are supposed to, anyway. Nobody does, because who wants to remember being bored.

I just gave up on continuity of conscious entirely. Not for any philosophical reason I just don't really about death. I go to sleep, a distinct entity with all my perceptions wakes up? Subjectively indistinguishable from taking a nap. And yeah the fear of death the dread of eternity but honestly if

some other jackass wants to take the reigns of this existence so I can tap out? More power to you buddy you already know the wifi password have fun with our life. Anyway the obvious answer, to me, is make your sci-fi brain scanner non-destructive and maintain awareness throughoutbthe process. Like,

idk, bring neurons in the new brain online at the same rate you take neurons in the old brain offline so you're aware and have a furious headache the entire time. It's all fantasy anyway people just decided to go with "we're literally going to chop your head off and sew it to a Frankenstein" and

since it's all imaginary they don't have to do that. It's like Star Trek sidestepping the whole problem by having transporters turn you in to a conscious and aware energy being instead of breaking you down and rebuilding you. If the immortality ray uses destrctive scanning and fails to maintain

I'm unfortunately the person going 'a scan of the brain is a photo of nerves and fat clumps, a person is a continuous series of electrochemical signals firing along pathways with certain trends and tendencies but forever singing itself in response to itself and the experience of the world'

Hell yeah, i haven't gotten to talk to anyone who's done it but my therapist is v familiar with it and I've done a lot of legwork on cannabis psychadelics already so I'm really hopeful? I want my art back if nothing else.

Holy shit, you managed to find a Real Life 'Simon; the stupidest videogame protagonist ever, the videogame protagonist who refuses to understand that a copy is a different object from the original it was copied from' in the wild?!? I can't think of anything more depressing than that...

it’s not a new problem too! there’s a handful of sci fi from the early 2000s where it’s clear they read the same essay about replacing neurons one by one to ensure continuity; but that’s too difficult on its face and it makes me thing these people are just philosophical zombies, so maybe it can work

Yeah. As an anterograde amnesiac, I have experienced the lack of self-continuity but it was still me, having all the experiences I don't remember experiencing. I don't understand why this is hard? If a digital copy of me is "tortured" or "pleasured" in the future, that's none of my business.

My favourite one of these is Kurzweil saying he can resurrect his dad one day because he has copies of the man's diary, writings, electricity bills,

My annoyance is with the people who think this isn't the case - including a lot of sci-fi authors. Like they have "immortality" but it's just a digital copy of your brain and people seem to think this is just fine. Peter F. Hamilton pulled that in Pandora's Star.

I'm cognitively impaired due to some of my disabilities, and I always liked that in SOMA, Simon's peristent confusion, difficulty to adjust, moments of derealisation/depersonalisation, difficulty concentrating, etc. are all real cognitive impairment symptoms. He starts the game disabled.

It touches on real fears for people like me: People only have so much patience for those of us with cognitive problems. Many players "gave up" on Simon out of frustration, like the lady in the game. But for me, I'm like Simon. How long until my one companion gives up on me, too?

There will 100% be a consciousness-uploading startup that raises billions from Thiel types (no relation!) and it will be called Theseus. I've never been more confident of anything in my life.

That bugged me so much about Altered Carbon. No, you're not immortal...you're a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy. The original person that was "you" died years ago.

Literally fried her own processors rather than spend another second in the depths of the ocean with that whiny idiot. (I still feel for Simon, but come on, man. You ran a comic book shop, you should KNOW THESE TROPES.)

I don’t immortality, but I'd really appreciate if just before the lights go out I'd get a score card letting me know how well I did. Preferably in the style of a late 90s/early 00s Japanese arcade game.

Simon’s inability to internalize what feels like a very simple concept kept me at arm’s length from much of that game.

"Internalize" is a thing human minds do, which is notably not the thing you're playing in soma. the hands are the first and most blatant example of this but

Same. Honestly my biggest note is that I wish the game made use of interactivity a bit better if that was gonna be the big twist and made the parts where we weren't "our" simon short cutscenes with no interactivity, to make clear it was a memory and not something we actually experienced.

I always try to keep in mind that Simon had literal terminal brain damage at the time of his scan. He's relatively lucid at that point, but he's not "firing on all cylinders" so to speak. Certain concepts he struggles to process, especially with the way the digital mind tries to protect itself.

Folks, this is the sort of content you only get when Rowan is 80 percent asleep from the covid vaccine hangover

This is a plot point in Invincible. There's a baseline level of understanding most people should be able to manage, and it's somewhere above "superhero cartoon".

I mean there's a very popular YouTube cartoon that also has this plot point but that would be a huge spoiler.

honestly I assumed both "catherine" and "simon" have little WAU-derived tripwires that keep them from 'getting it' in the sense a (pre-ooze) human could. they're both, in their own ways, following their program

i think she's 100% just manipulating him into being her hands with whatever take seems useful in the moment, but i'm not sure she's really *aware* of it. (i mean she's running off an ipad half the time...) there's a few times where it seems like she's deliberately omitting it OR not specifying shit

and this is the kind of existential question that comes with not being human in a *biological* sense any more, since how our "minds" work or "thinking" works carries an infinite bucket of assumptions and unspoken (unspeakable? unnoticable?) prerequisites that just aren't there

ok but did you know that the human body consists of up to 75 trillion individual cells? They typically don't stay with us 'til we die, some live a few days, while others live a few years. I don't think anyone would argue that we ever lose our persona due to this process, yet we are clearly in a cons

Like I will grant that a version of me might persist in digital form, and knowing myself that version is likely to appreciate it, but I'm not going to be the beneficiary of that. Unless we have to invoke the quantum "No Clone" theorem in which case I died in the process.

yeah if it's a *transfer* or a question of "which is really YOU". this was a simple question of "does taking a scan of your brain and uploading it to the cloud make you literally immortal". don't give this person any credit, I've been trying to lead that horse to water and it's just licking it's ass

My favorite thing about the Mauler Twins in Invincible - they will always argue about who is the clone and who the original, but only because they KNOW that the only way to live with each other is to NOT know.

I always felt like I'm missing something with that. There are two places in the room they can wake up, one is where they'd remember being and the other isn't. How can they not know?

I want to make a digital copy of myself not to be immortal, but because I think I am awesome and I want to give the gift of myself to future generations.

What, other people don’t wonder if you actually die when you go to sleep and the person who wakes up is just a perfect copy who doesn’t know this, and death is exactly the same except you just don’t wake up?

And you have to make sure that the “uploading” process isn’t just copying you and flushing the original. The best solution I’ve seen to this mental exercise is a Ship of Theseus process where the new “hardware” takes over functions gradually until there no original bio processes left…

…but we’d need to understand the human body and it’s fully-holistic processes MUCH BETTER than we do now to make that aa possibility. Until then—you die, and a rough facsimile of you runs on a server somewhere. 🤷‍♂️

my thought has always been that you'd basically need to "expand" your brain - hook it up to external hardware it can use like More Brain and stay like that until most of your thinking is happening on the hardware. then losing your bio-brain is more like a form of minor/controlled brain damage.

At some point on Hinge I’m probably going to have to say, “You want to connect your brain to the computer because you want to be immortal. I want to connect my brain to the computer because I want to be a machine. We are not the same.”

All the talk of transporters reminded me of Timeline, and Michael Crichton having them acknowledge (to the dude who didn’t travel) that yeah, your friend was destroyed, the machine just pulls an extremely similar version of them and puts it there, don’t worry about it

I cracked my landscaping guy's head open a little by telling him that the only thing simulation theory can do is remove meaning and value from your life. He paused and said "whoa" and then agreed and dropped the conversation completely and permanently. A rare win for discourse.

The self is a delusion, you is a matter of degrees. One wants to be uploaded because it’d be cool to have had one’s life so far and experience being uploaded. You don’t “get” anything except what you’re experiencing at any given moment.

i thought the coin toss was meant to be a meta nudge anyway. the two simons are two different guys but theoretically a play could have assumed control of either

that's exactly my beef with it though, copies wouldn't have any agency over stuff that happened before they were created, so I think it's weird for players to have any agency over those parts (like the playable intro in toronto).

see I don't buy that it's a coin toss, that framing doesn't make any sense. you're either experiencing reality presently or remembering it. If you're experiencing presently something a copy would only remember, you're not that other guy and nothing you do will make you that other guy.

Yeah I liked soma but I was telling this at Simon the entire time. like my guy!!!! it’s not that hard to understand!!!!!!!!! you aren’t the other guy *now* so you won’t be in the future! you will always be the guy you are

and this is my biggest beef with SOMA. It's a game, it could've done a lot about this with making some parts interactive and other parts cutscene. The entire problem is an experiential one and the game just kinda didn't use anything a game can do to make any of that point.

I respect it, I was pretty engrossed with it as speculative scifi and I imagine being a game designer scratches the part of your brain that goes "WHY IS IT JUST AMNESIA THO??" A Mouthwashing narrative reorder would do a lot.

the premise of the game is genuinely, literally, "what it would be like to be a moron trapped in a situation beyond your understanding" and in that premise i think it excels the people who are actually real life stupid think its message/concepts are brilliant, rather than its metanarrative

right but soma is a game about a literally brain damaged, probably mentally deficient even prior to the incident, poorly-copied-from-many-many-copies, stupid man's journey through being told that immortality isn't real and anything pretending to be it is actually deeply horrifying

it's not a BAD game, but it's a well trod story premise in sci fi fiction that has been explored in a lot of interesting ways - it would've been really cool to see a game do that in ways only a game could, and it feels like the design completely missed that chance and the story was fairly basic

Did they do a retcon? Because the old lore was pretty explicit about the brain scan process frying your brain and the scan results being transmitted over the FTL router network to be imposed onto your clone. The only thing preventing the data from going to multiple clones is CONCORD getting big mad

Oh, it does, but the message for session transitions (e.g. new instance) regardless of which kind you use has always read "transferring consciousness". The fact that the Intaki also have a reference to having developed a "natural" form of reincarnation also has interesting implications.

Yeah but at that point I feel it's more of a philosophical question if one can call it a transfer, also "xeroxing your brain" would make for a very puzzling (tho much funnier imho) message I had forgotten entirely about the Reborn transferring themselves into newborns. Did they ever explain that?

There's grace in an understanding of "a me will exist" and not "this me will exist". If one does not resent the other for being the guy who woke up in the other pod. If you could know someone was loving your lover, friending your friends, carrying your dropped ideals, would that truly be so bad?

yes because I would still be dead regardless of what the entity that is not me does. Other people would be doing that if you copied me or not. It'd be kinda egotistical to think that wouldn't happen unless you copied yourself exactly, no? Regardless, it's still not immortality.

Point being what kind of immortality do you care about. What does the you continuing matter to be, and does it have to be you who gets to do it. That's the deeper question But i doubt most people are thinking of it that way

yeah, the note behind the note that keeps me from removing "would you rather be immortal with no opt-out ability or mortal" from my profile is that it surfaces if people have thought about death and what it means much at all

Show em the theory behind particle deconstruction/reconstruction in teleportation and ask em if they think the person that is teleported is the same one that arrives. If it's a memory copy of the person down to the electrical activity in the brain, isn't the original just dead now?

The usual excuse for him being "he had brain trauma when he was copied" aside, I'll just chalk that up to his inability to comprehend the concept his own particular WAU induced problem, like all the other robots that think they're human

the question isn’t do I want to transfer my consciousness into a computer, it’s do I want to send a clone of my brain to hell

This is why I’d refuse to get into a transporter in Star Trek. Anyway, thinking too much about stuff like this is what got me to read Reasons and Persons by Derek Parfit which I recommend if you have a bent for philosophy that addresses these kinds of questions.

They are tho a couple of episodes explain that dematerialize is super literal; The transporters turn you in to a conscious energy being, shoots you at the destination, then flips the switch from "luminous being" back to "crude matter". ldk if the writer for thet episode intentionally wanted to side

step the continuity of consciousness thing. But in "canon" for wahtever th means for 60 years of low budget pulp sci fi you maintain subjectivity for the entire process. I'm gonna eat food and stop being like this I promise I am in the drive through right now.

idk it feels a little unfair to compare boomer style nihilism a la"I got hit as a kid so it's inevitable/fine for everyone else" to "every human who has ever existed so far has been mortal and will die and we're no exception, copying yourself won't prevent the you that you are from dying"

I feel like there are two lines that can be drawn: sometimes this was okay because it was necessary. Sometimes it was okay because it was unnecessary, but not destructive. And sometimes it was VERY MUCH NOT OKAY

I do like that this confusion is actually an issue within the universe of SOMA as well (beyond Simon's likely brain injury induced issues) with people building all sorts of justifications for how they'll totally get to be the one in the ARK Catherine had it rough

Quick aside is someone claims they can make a copy of a dead guy then tgey should prove it by making a copy of a live person. Like themselves If the technology is there prove it by replacing yourself, hypothetical tech bro

I'll never see a consciousness-continuation / Trek transporter conversation and not think of the poor guy in Mieville's _Kraken_ who developed the ability to transporter-beam himself places and ended up a clone haunted by the ghosts of hundreds of previous iterations of himself.

see at least a *transfer* has some actual philosophical arguments that can be made. this person was just saying a scan and duplicate operation would make them immortal. So two versions of you, one in the cloud, the other in your body.

Oh, sure. In the book it's just the tragic consequence of applying Trek logic to a supernatural world where souls exist. But yeah, the 'fidelity = identity' argument always seemed deeply absurd to me. He'd just be making a digital kid implanted with his memories.

Isn't this some kind of rarionalist-adjacent thing,where philosophically a sufficiently accurate reconstruction of a person is that person? I vaguely remember that being one of the bits that made Roko's Basilisk work or something.

It’s the reason I also give a huge berth to any idea of teleportation. I’d rather go with old-fashioned wormholes/portals. The teleportation stations are surely very eerie, because after all, it’s a huge grave of millions of terminated consciousnesses.

How about a Ship of Theusus style transfer? Some hypothetical future in which the brain could be replaced piece by piece with an artificial substrate in situ?

I immediately went to Soma before reaching the end of your post lmao. God what a good game. THERE CANT BE TWO SIMONS!!

Like, BEST CASE you believe that self is a persistent illusion & that neither the meat nor the digital copy have a real claim on "being you." But in that case, why the fuck do you care about being immortal, if it's not even you? You just think that the future can't be deprived of your razor wit?

My guy, you are going to wake up in the meat body, and some tech billionaire will have a script that can send emails convincing enough to confuse your most-disinterested coworkers. That's all the immortality that you're gonna get.

I have a longstanding "they would never do this though" headplotline where it's an engineering secret that the only reason transporters aren't called duplicators is because there's a second function to disintegrate the original and there's a rogue captain sending cloned redshirts on missions.

Otr I recall an account on the dead bird site that responded to a woman complaining of online harassment with something along the lines of "my blades are starving". Protip to anyone that reads this who thinks that would help a little: it didn't then and it never will, go see a fucking therapist

I am very confused by the people insisting that there is no experiential component to being alive or that if there is one it just kinda doesn't matter but either way it's still smarter and had more philosophical merit than the shit my hinge match said to me

this is why I am always gonna have a little bit of existentialist bait on my dating profiles, I am not gonna get all cute and leave the house to go on a date with someone with a distinct lack of any Theory of Mind

The fact that they're betting on the viability of a scifi concept and "is Will Riker the same as Tom Riker?" doesn't immediately end that fucking question chain is just......tooth grindingly frustrating

Except in Star Trek, where souls demonstrably exist, and can be transferred around, as Vulcans have proven. 🖖

it's one of the things that makes me go "god what is it even like to be Like That", there's plenty of shit I'm dense as hell about but this seems like basic "know that the guy in the mirror is not a whole other guy, it's just your reflection" shit

... well akshually for that case its kinda not? the guy in the mirror is its own guy now with your long term memories but its not you. simon1 wasnt og simon. but he remembered him. I still kinda think all simons are people who should have self determination. a clone is its own being, unowned

I think I finally know what I was doing wrong on Hinge. I was prioritizing being flirty and fun when I should have been the reason someone had a midlife crisis a full seven years early

Where are these people with the fun responses, I got an endless feed of people posing at corporate events and then gave up years ago

taking notes in case I ever have to make a dating profile again. Existentialist Bait would also be a great screenname, I mention for no reason

Such an interesting question! My ignorant guess is that because silicon-chip systems don't work using what may be called either the hardware or software of the brain, a download would be very hard to make happen Like, since the whole brain is a knit-together mush, there isn't a clean delete/reboot

yeah it's something i feel should be a bit self explanatory: any copy of me will not be the me that is right now. when this body dies, i die. it just takes like two seconds to think about

Meatspace is more fun anyways. We have cats Why would anyone want to live forever, anyways? Oh your digital construct just absorbed all known data in .0002ms? Great, now you’ve got the rest of eternity sitting on your non-existent ass hoping hoping nobody wipes your server

Yeah I really shouldn’t have generalized there I wish you a happy eternity of watching humans turn into energy or pair up with giant sentient pumpkins and build arcology ships