Post

here we find Eliezer Yudkowsky engaging in the classic 90s and 2000s genre of “insecure straight guy getting really defensive about liking Buffy the Vampire Slayer”

“Yes, I like Buffy, but not for the stupid reasons you plebeian ignoramuses do,” he says, while wearing a fedora and khaki cargo shorts (did Yud ever go through a Hawaiian shirt phase?)

While I am no psychologist or psychiatrist, Eliezer Yudkowsky’s account of his own life does read exactly like the writing of every other reasonably articulate person with a severe personality disorder:

Here is Eliezer Yudkowsky explaining (like a very normal person who absolutely does not have some kind of acute personality disorder) why, on the basis of his childhood test scores, he is a special genius uniquely qualified to change the world: web.archive.org/web/20010309...

81 reposts1K likes

"and that's why i get up in the morning" i think the universe made a fundamental mistake by saddling me with antifunctional depression and total executive dysfunction and that dude with a sense of mission and purpose

like. what can it possibly mean to say 10000 dedicated researchers unable to solve a problem doesn't mean a specialist couldn't solve it. in what possible meaning of the word are dedicated researchers not specialists. WHAT IS HE TRYING TO SAY

Seems like it's to say "Specialist," is a class of human that's above us Normies. 10,000 Normie researches pale in comparison to the intellectual might of a Specialist type thing. I refuse to go looking lest I learn more about this dork against my will.

This is the most dangerous line I read in that page: "because my intuitions are always right." This is a belief that is common to *all* religious extremists. And it is exactly the same degree of dangerous from all of them. Also, imagine thinking that, and then failing to score 1600 on the SAT.

This, however, is the funniest: "I specifically deny permission to quote this page in whole or in part." Super-genius right there who def understood copyright. Caveat is that I did not read the whole thing, nor very closely. So there could potentially be funnier or more insane things I didn't read.

where "out of context" means, I suspect, "any context that makes me look like a deranged jackass huffing his own farts" unfortunately, that is all possible context

yeah what he needed was the more humbling experience for insufferable nerds: be put in a room full of *even higher achieving* insufferable nerds, who put you in your place and remind you there are *always* going to be a nerd even more insufferable than you, out there somewhere.

Such an exceptional genius yet doesn’t understand copyright law. Guess what, law is just one of many subjects you haven’t mastered yet, even though your limited experience leads you to believe that all problems are basically like high school math.

You can see his scientific method there. Instead of finding evidence that special boys exist, he does a little just-so evo-biology thought experiment, imagines an "outcome" that special boys must logically exist, and bases his entire argument on this "outcome" he just imagined right in front of you.

I wish I had something more substantial to add here, but all I can think is "What a loser". And "What a bunch of losers" for his whole movement. Anyone that special doesn't have to tell us he's that special. We'll see it for ourselves. And what we're seeing is frankly embarrassing.

like I suspect many of you on This Website, I think a core reason why I find Eliezer Yudkowsky and his rationalist and effective altruist satellites so intensely annoying is because I had a VERY similar “being a super weird, pretentious, hyper-literate kid” experience - I just, you know, grew up.

Was it a blessing in disguise that my executive functioning was so bad that my shitty grades served as a counterbalance to the fawning over my test scores? The years of depression would indicate no, but I didn't become one of these dipshits so perhaps there's an argument to be had

Welp, my mother *really* helped. Yes, you're really (really) good in school. NO that doesn't make you better than anybody. I *didn't* understand the part about "you intimidate people in ten seconds" for many years :P

I’ve forgiven my younger self but I still feel intense (i) shame about the way I carried myself from 16-22 or so and (ii) regret at the learning my puerile arrogance cost me. I’m a year older than Yudkowsky. Maybe I shoulda stayed the weeded out frat boy who could half quote Derrida?

something something "true knowledge is in knowing you know nothing" something something "if you're always the 'smartest' person in the room then you're in the wrong rooms" something

ah yes, mere schoolyard complaints bsky.app/profile/fain...

Faine Greenwood@faineg.com

Women trying to succeed in Silicon Valley AI and effective altruist spaces are reporting feeling serious social pressure to attend sex parties - where people have reported being sexually assaulted, like below. Events like Aella’s “Slutcon,” which is happening again this weekend.

As a former pretentious little shit who grew out of it, rationalists (et al) annoy the piss out of me because they are adults with the mentality of tweens - they are somehow still convinced they are the greatest geniuses who have ever walked the earth. It is the worldview of an arrogant baby.

I can’t help but think that going to college would have helped *some* of these people with humility. I was all kinds of smart kid hot shit (with a sweet mental condition to spice things up) but holy fucking shit professors of philosophy and psychology at Duke were “super smart kids who spent 30-50

years reading and writing and researching extremely carefully” and holy shit do you realize what true erudition and deep knowledge and often wisdom looks like (more often the former two, interestingly enough, even among philosophers). And they tended to be quite humble despite their “yeah then I

Sometimes there is someone who clearly is a genius at a young age (e.g. Richard Feynman who had theorems named after him while still a teenager). But the other part of genius is knowing it's boundaries and that being a genius at physics or music doesn't make you a genius at everything else.

Right. There's little* shame in having a sophomoric fascination with rat-ism/AanRynd/FHerbert/... pretentious whatever as a sophomore, provided one grows out of it. *yes, a little, it's good for humility to remember being THAT wrong, and remembering that growth is possible. (Even in others.)

(Our Honors Physics TA was a perpetual grad student and editor of the local rat-ist birdcage liner. He was strategically positioned, intentionally or not, to recruit the most arrogant frosh to the movement. But he personally was hardly an aspirational role model.)

We think one of the main values of going to an elite school as a pretentious little shit is meeting people who are: 1. Smarter than you, and/or 2. So pretentious as to be unbearable. It really can provide perspective.

It is no coincidence that rationalists and EAs tend to be straight white guys from well-off families, because for everybody else, the world usually conspires to knock some sense into you about your inherent god-emperor genius by the time you’re old enough to drink.

A lot of these guys also leave formal education pretty early, which is too bad because there is nothing like getting an advanced degree (in my experience) to teach you that you are not smart and your brain is not special.

Faine, Yudkowksy is literally the first person to point out that it would be a bad thing for society to be run by evil artificial intelligence, breaking with decades of scientific consensus.

What I find annoying is that the rest of us (I mean mostly those of us assigned prey at birth), upon learning we were creepy and off-putting and getting past our Wednesday Addams leaning into it phase, asked a very different question than "how do I mask that to get laid"

The older I get, the more at peace with my bipolarness I am cuz the version of me that DIDN'T have the universe directly saying "bruh you are not the 'smarter than EVERYONE cuz you do good on standardized tests' genius you thought you were" would be just....unbearable.

if Eliezer Yudkowsky was born into a somewhat poorer family and missed a couple lucky breaks, he’d have ended up as an archetypal specimen of your friend’s older cousin who keeps boa constrictors and makes you listen to him talk about quantum physics in his parent’s basement in exchange for weed

Reading that crap from Yudkowski I thought, 'Didn't this kid ever have chores? A summer job?' By the time I got my working papers at 14 I had jobs as babysitter, mower of lawns, and I had a newspaper route. Plus farm & garage chores. At 14 I started caddying. 2 bags. 18, 27, sometimes 36 holes/day.

I was mostly shedding that like an ill-fitting cocoon by high school/college, but I will say transitioning really sped that process along.

I also think that kids who are intellectually different enough from their peers in the same sense as a future pro athlete or musician, that's going to be every bit as noticeable. Those kids are going to get some hard knocks at least until their final growth spurt. I don't think Yud was that kid.

A little bit of weed or mushrooms in this dude’s formative years could have saved trillions of dollars, and lives, but no, he was too lame/pretentious to even be invited to do that.

but see, even straigh white gues from well-off families who see themselves as The Most Very Clever in the Room eventually get into top schools, and are then surrounded by kids who were doing graduate level math at age 10 and go, oh shit, this room is *full* of clever people, and ✨uPDatE oUr pRiORs✨

I would guess that these guys have not put themselves in situations where they'd have to learn humility. Right? Yudkowsky didn't even finish high school. People who went through programs with high weed-out rates --engineering or physics or pre-med or architecture -- know they have limitations.

He just sounds so insufferable. Like holy shit, that's not even *actual intelligence* that he's describing. He's maybe trivia smart (and that's coming from someone who is trivia smart, where I can retain information easily but I'm not good at applying it) but not much else.

Yup. You can have top 1% test scores and that just means there's tens of millions of people as smart or smarter than you. Ultimately everyone settles at "mediocre relative to peers" due to selection effects, unless they get really lucky.

The older I get, the humbler I get. I feel like I know nothing sometimes compared to when I was younger & thought I knew everything. Intellectual humility goes a long way. Y'all can feel free to call me out as arrogant swine now, but seriously, domain knowledge doesn't make you smart at everything.

Reading these reminds me so much of my POS uncle and his sons, at least the last time I had any kind of regular contact with them. "X is my favorite Y, therefore it is empirically superior to all other Ys and any intelligent person would agree" is extremely them.

I do not want that kind of person in charge of or to have influence over anything more important than a book club for pretentious assholes. They're so completely convinced of their own superiority, and they can't stop telling the plebs about all their important thoughts - as a service, of course.

Every useful smart person has to figure two things out in their adolescence/early adult years. 1. The smartest kids at your HS school are part of a cohort of 10s of millions at that level. 2. Potential only matters as a child. Competence and achievement are what matter on this vector as an adult.

My experience at (redacted, but will become obvious) capital taught me that basically everyone there learns this lesson - except for the one guy there who really is the best, whose identity I will not divulge. And SBF, who left before he learned risk management I guess

I mean, I agree, but I vaguely recall various libertarian's saying 'why can't we mate with 14-15 year olds we did it in the middle ages and I just don't see too much light between the 2. And I'm like oh, I guess I can't really engage with you intellectually because you only see me as a vessel.

All he needs to do is open up a D&D book and see that Intelligence and Wisdom are two very different stats. "Intelligence is knowing tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad."

Exactly! Both pitiful and ultimate cringe. No self awareness of that fact that they are pampered man-babies Ugh, I just remembered how I left SAT scores on my resume for at least 2 years post college. 🤢

One of the best takedowns of the "rationalists" and Libertarians is in Fargo, season 5: Roy: "I want freedom without arbitrary rules.” Lorraine: "So you want freedom without responsibility? Son, there's only one person on Earth who gets that deal." Roy: "The President?" Lorraine: "A baby.”

Oh good lord do I know that... I tested *cough* fairly high on an IQ test, and was the smuggest little shit to walk the face of the planet. Think Sheldon Cooper without the endearing quirks. Thankfully I grew out of that in high school.

I scored 95th percentile on IQ tests & SATs & I liked to read a lot but I don't think I ever felt smarter than the average bozo. Quite the opposite; actually. Imposter syndrome from an early age. I have been blessed from kindergarten with a feeling of being pretty ordinary. 1/2

My main goals as a teenager were to play Clapton's 'Crossroads' solo on my guitar & to dunk a basketball. Also I thought it would have been nice to date a girl who didn't tell me she had a new boyfriend after going out with me 2 or 3 times. Never came close to any of these goals. Sigh. 2/2

Missed that second goal by ~inch. Didn't really have goals (beyond avoiding clinical psychopaths I went to school with - some years luckier than others), but apocalyptic cult lifestyle has a tendency to de-emphasize long run thinking.

Same!! I keep trying to tell people, this was literally me as a teen! I was that kid who thought he was secretly better than other people because of my "logical" thinking. "Like spock".

I used to be pretty active in the super-high-IQ societies and Yudkowsky's whole schtick looks goddamn familiar to me. They tend to collect people whose particular aptitude in convergent cognitive tasks allows them to overlook and explain away their fulminant and driving emotional imbalances.

I asked about joining Mensa as a kid and my mom told me it was for insecure losers and she was 100% right about that

Heh, I was a member for some time and yeah, if you're smart but secure and have other ways to connect to people you can get along with it's not going to be very useful to you. And it's even truer for the societies with higher score requirements.

Yes there’s a very strong THERE BUT FOR THE GRACE OF GOD GO I element to my visceral revulsion at those fedora wearing sex weirdos

True. A lot of my life has been absolutely miserable but on reflection it was also sticking by a moral and ethical code I'm glad I had, and it could have gone very differently. I knew shame, and didn't rationalize being monstrous, I steered clear of it anytime I spotted it. These folks… eek.

Precocious only child of an academic? Johns Hopkins CTY summer camps? Christ almighty I dodged some bullets.

i was never that bad, but yes that’s why i find them utterly contemptible it wasn’t hard to step back from that attitude, expand my field of view and grow up.

Literally my thinking reading this thread was “all of my friends (and me) who were like this grew out of this by like the age of 18?”

I don't think I was pretentious, but literate and weird - that I can do. Probably it's because I grew up in an area where mot of the kids were very bright. (I've always felt absolutely average, as a result.)

I realized that knowing a bunch of facts doesn’t mean I know what the best answer to a problem is and certainly doesn’t mean I should be in charge of anything. Those are two entirely different sets of competencies and too often people who have the former think they automatically have the latter.

He's a middle school dropout, so he never had to see his own insufferability reflected back at him from someone else, nor did he receive the ego bruising of having to actually work to be at the top of the class

Yes, per wiki he dropped out and autodidacted, thereby missing the most crucial parts in the education of most prodigy type A pricks.

It's somewhat ironic that unique special genius world-saver Yudkowsky simply cannot write to save his life. Like, choose any sentence and ask yourself: what does this actually mean? He is incapable of communicating.

E.g. "That, at any rate, would be the argument I'd use if I were trying to set up a socially acceptable set of emotional bindings under which "I can change the world" sounds like a modest endeavor."

OMFG you have to be a different kind of stupid to believe that. I scored very very high at 14 (164), I was a weird kid, read Flowers for Algernon, Dune et al. Then did a bit of reading into intelligence testing and then it was pretty clear that it's pretty pointless outside of broad aptitude.

Yeah, I got a very high score on the IQ test at ten and now I'm a psychologist who knows it's useless for gauging anything other than significant disabilities that require government services, or if you just happen to be good at the specific tasks it uses as proxy for intelligence.

They wouldn't tell me my score at 10 but told my mum, who spent the next decade telling me I was a "genius". Mum, I'm just a nerd who did low-level coding as a kid and was socially inept. I'm 100% certain that Yudkowsky's mum was the same only he actually believed it.

Yeah, I mean it tells you that someone has read a lot in the language you're testing, or that they're good at the kind of pattern recognition or logical puzzles. So they tend to correlate with good school performance. But it's a general direction and has little to do with "genius".

We're the same school year (he's a year older) and both missed a lot of middle school. Both read a whole lot of Hebrew (and for me Greek, was a church thing). Clearly wired to do very well in such tests. Only he's clearly has some mental issues and probably didn't read the end of Algernon :-)

It is like listening to little kids talk. Who’s the most important, what’s the most important job, etc. Replace “job” with “episode of Bluey” and I think I heard some third graders having this conversation the other day.

Can’t believe people find this guy intelligent. Cripes. Also enjoy his side fear of the grey goo. I guess he somehow got convinced that one wasn’t possible but it didn’t cause him to rethink his AI fears?

He fits into my theory about a lot of Silicon Valley guys-they didn’t get laid in high school and are still mad about it. Now that they have money they live out their anger against everybody and cover it up with a BS philosophy. And now they pay for sex.

I took the PSATs when I was like 15 and when I got the results I was in like the 98th percentile, and I vividly remember thinking "I'm smart, but not *that* smart. I guess I'm actually pretty good at standardized tests"

like I definitely thought i was hot shit my freshman year of college because of my sat stores etc. but the upperclassmen in my fraternity were quick to point out that EVERY college freshman has good sat scores. Thats why we’re in college

oh my gooooodd, someone shove this man in a locker ffs. Everything I learn about these dweebs is against my will and it's like if you took the most annoying kid in 7th grade, gave them a billion dollars and a deeply unsettling interest in race science.

This sounds like a fella that runs around at parties telling people that he is more sophisticated than them, and he's had yet to have anyone take him seriously enough to beat that ass inside out. Shame.

This fool’s ramblings have given me a headache. Right side, behind the eye and down into the jaw. High standardized test scores do not a genius make. Nor do they quantify one’s morality, emotional intelligence, or leadership ability. Yet his ego is riding those scores straight to fantasyland.

Not that I should expect otherwise, but once again, another example of how the bullies have failed all of us.

he talks like an emotionally stunted 14 year old. it's just all so sad. the end of the world is all so sad. god these losers just need to go to therapy.

This whole bit about how only a special boy like him could "solve AI" is even stupider when combined with the observation that all he has ever done to "solve AI" is ask for donations and write what may generously be called opinion pieces. He isn't working on AI! He does scifi thought experiments.

Do I understand correctly that he thought if he didn't exist, artificial superintelligence would be "solved" in 2020? That's very funny in hindsight

mentats were at least trained, accredited and worked - he's claiming all of this based on nothing more than "being a special little boy that did above average on some tests as a kid"

In my experience, if two people who were national merit scholars meet, they’ll inevitably swap SAT scores, but only the chudliest of chuds will think their scores actually mean more than their being good at standardized tests.

all this countersphexism stuff is absolutely frying me. "the way you think your mind works personally" can't be a specific categorizable Thing if you're the only example you've found he really sounds like an early chapter of a bad YA book, about kids with semi-supernatural abilities tho

i think if he got a really really good editor, he could have made a much greater contribution to the world by writing a YA series where the mental superpowers he thinks he has are a real actual thing. would really appeal to tweens who think they too are misunderstood supergenii

I just started listening to the audiobook last night to learn more about Yudkowsky and how he thinks, and it has been sending me. He is so transparent, but somehow people in the Ratsphere don't see it 😭

Someone like Yorgos Lanthimos needs to make a spoof of these guys where the AI doom does actually come and our Lord and Savior here is the first one to die from his own narcissism and stupidity. It would be hilarious.

EY does cite his scores. People have been acing the SAT tests since they started. Played with someone in the ‘60s with perfect scores in math & english, chemistry & a 798/800 in biology. Decades later he worked for Cisco and said that it was good to work with smart people.

You know, I got an 800 on the Math SAT at 14, and like a 650 English with that? ...Got a 1590 in my senior year. I don't think I'm anything that special. I just test well. I'm decent with those stupid analogy things they like, and my father taught me maths really young. I'll answer any questions.

Gifted and talented is also special ed, my dude. The kids good at taking tests are also segregated from the regular kids, and for the same reason. Just because you rode the short bus in the middle of the day instead of to and from school you think you're destined to run the world? Pitiful.