Post
very tired of pretending that dismissing modern economics is somehow more reasonable than dismissing vaccines. if you’re not an expert, you don’t get to pick and choose parts of a field to believe! you have no way to tell between legitimate and illegitimate results in that field!
28 reposts372 likes
Here's an actual economist citing another economist who did proper research and came to a conclusion similar to the comic. I agree people go overboard against Economics, but lack of academic rigor and conclusions that don't reflect reality are the source of that distrust youtube.com/shorts/KgEAG...
It's not the same thing. Unlike economics, vaccines come from science. Libertarians like Rose Wilder Lane got Keynesian Econ textbooks banned by getting rich donors to threaten schools. Economics is shaped by the economic interests of the elites, not experiments. www.aaup.org/sites/defaul...
Apparently the "nerd face" emoji is, in some carefully-undefined sense, "reactionary". The whole Unicode Consortium is basically Joseph Goebbels. Sorry you had to find out this way. bsky.app/profile/eiko...
also probably unintentional but “weird monied elite with strange facial features doesn’t care about the Real Common People (you know, us)” is a reactionary cliche
I think you are wrong on multiple levels: a) Vaccines are based on science, which is much older than economics. Economics is a young discipline in historical terms b) Traditionally a lot of economics relied on maximising the pie for the well-off, with an implicit belief in trickle down effect. cont.